Paper ID: 2307.08065

MaGNAS: A Mapping-Aware Graph Neural Architecture Search Framework for Heterogeneous MPSoC Deployment

Mohanad Odema, Halima Bouzidi, Hamza Ouarnoughi, Smail Niar, Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque

Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are becoming increasingly popular for vision-based applications due to their intrinsic capacity in modeling structural and contextual relations between various parts of an image frame. On another front, the rising popularity of deep vision-based applications at the edge has been facilitated by the recent advancements in heterogeneous multi-processor Systems on Chips (MPSoCs) that enable inference under real-time, stringent execution requirements. By extension, GNNs employed for vision-based applications must adhere to the same execution requirements. Yet contrary to typical deep neural networks, the irregular flow of graph learning operations poses a challenge to running GNNs on such heterogeneous MPSoC platforms. In this paper, we propose a novel unified design-mapping approach for efficient processing of vision GNN workloads on heterogeneous MPSoC platforms. Particularly, we develop MaGNAS, a mapping-aware Graph Neural Architecture Search framework. MaGNAS proposes a GNN architectural design space coupled with prospective mapping options on a heterogeneous SoC to identify model architectures that maximize on-device resource efficiency. To achieve this, MaGNAS employs a two-tier evolutionary search to identify optimal GNNs and mapping pairings that yield the best performance trade-offs. Through designing a supernet derived from the recent Vision GNN (ViG) architecture, we conducted experiments on four (04) state-of-the-art vision datasets using both (i) a real hardware SoC platform (NVIDIA Xavier AGX) and (ii) a performance/cost model simulator for DNN accelerators. Our experimental results demonstrate that MaGNAS is able to provide 1.57x latency speedup and is 3.38x more energy-efficient for several vision datasets executed on the Xavier MPSoC vs. the GPU-only deployment while sustaining an average 0.11% accuracy reduction from the baseline.

Submitted: Jul 16, 2023