Paper ID: 2406.11843

Explanation Hacking: The perils of algorithmic recourse

Emily Sullivan, Atoosa Kasirzadeh

We argue that the trend toward providing users with feasible and actionable explanations of AI decisions, known as recourse explanations, comes with ethical downsides. Specifically, we argue that recourse explanations face several conceptual pitfalls and can lead to problematic explanation hacking, which undermines their ethical status. As an alternative, we advocate that explanations of AI decisions should aim at understanding.

Submitted: Mar 22, 2024