Paper ID: 2409.05866

A Framework for Evaluating PM2.5 Forecasts from the Perspective of Individual Decision Making

Renato Berlinghieri, David R. Burt, Paolo Giani, Arlene M. Fiore, Tamara Broderick

Wildfire frequency is increasing as the climate changes, and the resulting air pollution poses health risks. Just as people routinely use weather forecasts to plan their activities around precipitation, reliable air quality forecasts could help individuals reduce their exposure to air pollution. In the present work, we evaluate several existing forecasts of fine particular matter (PM2.5) within the continental United States in the context of individual decision-making. Our comparison suggests there is meaningful room for improvement in air pollution forecasting, which might be realized by incorporating more data sources and using machine learning tools. To facilitate future machine learning development and benchmarking, we set up a framework to evaluate and compare air pollution forecasts for individual decision making. We introduce a new loss to capture decisions about when to use mitigation measures. We highlight the importance of visualizations when comparing forecasts. Finally, we provide code to download and compare archived forecast predictions.

Submitted: Sep 9, 2024