Paper ID: 2409.13476

Dermatologist-like explainable AI enhances melanoma diagnosis accuracy: eye-tracking study

Tirtha Chanda, Sarah Haggenmueller, Tabea-Clara Bucher, Tim Holland-Letz, Harald Kittler, Philipp Tschandl, Markus V. Heppt, Carola Berking, Jochen S. Utikal, Bastian Schilling, Claudia Buerger, Cristian Navarrete-Dechent, Matthias Goebeler, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Carolin V. Schneider, Benjamin Durani, Hendrike Durani, Martin Jansen, Juliane Wacker, Joerg Wacker, Reader Study Consortium, Titus J. Brinker

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have substantially improved dermatologists' diagnostic accuracy for melanoma, with explainable AI (XAI) systems further enhancing clinicians' confidence and trust in AI-driven decisions. Despite these advancements, there remains a critical need for objective evaluation of how dermatologists engage with both AI and XAI tools. In this study, 76 dermatologists participated in a reader study, diagnosing 16 dermoscopic images of melanomas and nevi using an XAI system that provides detailed, domain-specific explanations. Eye-tracking technology was employed to assess their interactions. Diagnostic performance was compared with that of a standard AI system lacking explanatory features. Our findings reveal that XAI systems improved balanced diagnostic accuracy by 2.8 percentage points relative to standard AI. Moreover, diagnostic disagreements with AI/XAI systems and complex lesions were associated with elevated cognitive load, as evidenced by increased ocular fixations. These insights have significant implications for clinical practice, the design of AI tools for visual tasks, and the broader development of XAI in medical diagnostics.

Submitted: Sep 20, 2024