cs.LGDec 13, 2021

Learning to Schedule in Parallel-Server Queues with Stochastic Bilinear Rewards

Authors: Jung-hun KimMilan Vojnovic

Organizations: CREST, ENSAE Paris, France · London School of Economics, United Kingdom

Abstract

We consider the problem of scheduling in multi-class, parallel-server queuing systems with uncertain rewards from job-server assignments. In this scenario, jobs incur holding costs while awaiting completion, and job-server assignments yield observable stochastic rewards with unknown mean values. The mean rewards for job-server assignments are assumed to follow a bilinear model with respect to features that characterize jobs and servers. Our objective is to minimize regret by maximizing the cumulative reward of job-server assignments over a time horizon, while keeping the total job holding cost bounded to ensure the stability of the queueing system. This problem is motivated by applications requiring resource allocation in network systems. A central challenge is to control the tradeoff between reward maximization and fair allocation for the stability of the underlying queuing system (i.e., maximizing network throughput). To address this challenge, we propose a scheduling algorithm based on a weighted proportional fair criteria augmented with marginal costs for reward maximization, incorporating a bandit algorithm tailored for bilinear rewards. Our algorithm admits a regret--queue length tradeoff. For any fixed control parameter V>0V>0, it ensures a uniform expected queue length and time-average holding-cost bounds. For a target horizon TT, choosing VT=Θ(IT)V_T=Θ(\sqrt{IT}) at initialization yields O~((I+d2)T+1/δ)\widetilde O((\sqrt I+d^2)\sqrt T+1/δ) regret. Under this regret-optimized tuning, the corresponding expected queue length and time-average holding-cost bounds remain uniform over the execution time and scales as O(IT+1/δ)O(\sqrt{IT}+1/δ) and O(IT/δ)O(\sqrt{IT}/δ), respectively.

Explore similar work

Jun 8, 2026cs.LG

Algorithm for Contextual Queueing Bandits with Rate-Optimal Queue Length Regret

Contextual queueing bandits provide a framework for learning to schedule heterogeneous jobs under unknown context-dependent service rates. Under stochastic contexts, existing algorithms achieve O~(T1/4)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{-1/4}) queue length regret, defined as the expected difference between the learner's and oracle's queue lengths at horizon TT. In this paper, we improve this rate to O~(T1/2)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{-1/2}). The key observation is that random exploration is needed only up to a carefully chosen cutoff round, rather than throughout the entire horizon. We propose CQB-ηη-2, a three-phase algorithm: (i) pure random exploration to construct an initial estimator, (ii) ηη-random exploration combined with a UCB rule to continue learning while maintaining negative drift, and (iii) pure UCB after the exploration cutoff. Our proof decomposes the queue length regret at the cutoff round. Before the cutoff, negative drift suppresses queue length differences caused by suboptimal choices. After the cutoff, the first two phases provide sufficient random exploration samples, ensuring that UCB decisions incur small departure-rate gaps. Combining these two bounds yields queue length regret of order O~(T1/2)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{-1/2}). We further prove a minimax lower bound of order Ω(T1/2)Ω(T^{-1/2}). The proof constructs two hard instances that are statistically indistinguishable up to the final service decision, and uses a queue-specific coupling argument to convert the resulting testing error into queue length regret. Together, our upper and lower bounds characterize the minimax dependence on the horizon TT up to logarithmic factors.
Seoungbin Bae, Dabeen Lee
May 30, 2026cs.LG

Online Packet Scheduling with Deadlines and Learning

Network routers that enforce Quality-of-Service (QoS) guarantees must decide, at every clock cycle, which expiring packet of information to transmit, even when the value of the packet is unknown until it is processed. We frame this problem as the Online Packet Scheduling with Deadlines (OPSD) problem under Partial Feedback: packets arrive at every clock cycle, with different deadlines, but the weights are only observed after execution. Under a stochastic assumption on the unknown weights, we explore different variants of the OPSD problem with bandit feedback. We establish a connection between our setting and the sleeping bandits problem, and set our learning goal to αα-regret minimization. We provide algorithms with provable αα-regret guarantees under different spans of slackness, distinguishing systems allowing for randomization and systems that do not. In every scenario, our algorithms achieve an αα-regret upper bound of O~(KT)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(\sqrt{KT}\right), matching the lower bound for the standard bandit setting. In the practically relevant case of 22-bounded deadline instances, where the deadline is set at most one clock cycle away from the arrival, our deterministic algorithm achieves the provably tightest possible competitive ratio. Remarkably, when the number of distinct packet types K2K\ge 2 is finite, it is possible to break the well-established Φ=1+52Φ= \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2} competitive ratio barrier and attain a tighter competitive ratio θKθ_K ranging in [2,Φ)[\sqrt{2}, Φ).
Gianmarco Genalti, Achraf Azize, Vianney Perchet
Jul 26, 2026eess.SY

Outcome-Fair Restless Multi-Armed Bandits for Stochastic Deadline Scheduling

We study a restless multi-armed bandit (RMAB) problem for a stochastic deadline scheduling application. RMAB problems are solved using the Whittle index policy. The goal in RMAB is to maximize the expected cumulative discounted reward maximization. The Whittle index policy maximizes reward, but is not fair among two classes. In this paper, we introduce fairness criteria and study an outcome-fair model for RMAB which allows fairness for jobs and users structurally disadvantaged demographic classes. We formulate an outcome fair stochastic deadline scheduling problem as RMAB, and we develop the outcome fair Whittle index policy. We define a virtual queue mechanism that dynamically enforces long-term completion rate guaranties across demographic groups. We analyze a standard Whittle index policy and the outcome-fair index policy. We demonstrate the performance of our algorithms with numerical examples. We compare policies---Whittle index policy (no fairness), input-fairness Whittle index policy, outcome fair Whittle index policy. We observe that the outcome-fair Whittle index policy provides better fairness among classes compared to other policies. We demonstrate a trade off between fairness and profit. This decreases as the server capacity increases.
Shakti Sharma, Rahul Meshram