Which Spaces can be Embedded in L_p-type Reproducing Kernel Banach Space? A Characterization via Metric Entropy

Margin-based learning, exemplified by linear and kernel methods, is one of the few classical settings where generalization guarantees are independent of the number of parameters. This makes it a central case study in modern highly over-parameterized learning. We ask what minimal mathematical structure underlies this phenomenon. We begin with a simple margin-based problem in arbitrary metric spaces: concepts are defined by a center point and classify points according to whether their distance lies below $r$ or above $R$. We show that whenever $R>3r$, this class is learnable in \emph{any} metric space. Thus, sufficiently large margins make learnability rely only on the triangle inequality, without any linear or analytic structure being necessary. Our first main result extends this phenomenon to concepts defined by bounded linear combinations of distance functions, and reveals a sharp threshold: there exists a universal constant such that whenever the margin is larger than this constant, the class is learnable in every metric space, while below it there exist metric spaces where it is not learnable at all. We then ask whether margin-based learnability can always be explained via an embedding into a linear space -- that is, reduced to linear classification in some Banach space through a kernel-type construction. We answer this negatively by demonstrating a margin learnable class that cannot be embedded into any Banach space in which linear classification with margins is learnable.

Constructing mathematically tractable function spaces that capture hierarchical compositional representations remains a central challenge in statistical learning theory. We introduce Brownian kernel ladders (BKLs), a recursively defined hierarchy of integral reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces generated through Brownian-kernel integral constructions. Starting from linear functionals, each layer is obtained by integrating Brownian kernels over probability measures supported on subsets of the previous layer, yielding a recursive function-space model in which depth is encoded directly through the hierarchy. Based on this framework, we define canonical BKL spaces together with an associated complexity functional. We establish several analytical and statistical properties of these spaces. In particular, we show that BKL spaces form quasi-Banach spaces, satisfy depth-dependent Hölder regularity estimates, and exhibit strict monotonicity with respect to depth. We further prove existence results for regularized empirical risk minimization and derive Gaussian complexity bounds that remain uniformly controlled with respect to both the ambient dimension and the hierarchy depth. A key ingredient of the analysis is a combinatorial proof technique based on recursive subset decompositions and Brownian-kernel threshold representations. These estimates yield excess-risk guarantees of near-parametric order for regularized empirical risk minimization over BKL spaces. Our results provide a mathematically tractable hierarchical function-space framework for studying compositional representations in deep learning.

Information theory plays a central role in establishing fundamental limits on what any learning or estimation algorithm can -- and cannot -- achieve, regardless of computational power. In this chapter, we provide an introduction to these connections. End-of-chapter exercises makes the material suitable for both classroom use and self-study. We begin by introducing concentration inequalities along with the notions of covering and packing in metric spaces, and the associated concept of metric entropy. These tools are essential for our analysis. We then introduce the learning-theoretic framework and derive upper bounds on generalization error in terms of metric entropy, Rademacher complexity, and the VC dimension, as well as mutual information and relative entropy. Finally we discuss the minimax estimation framework and establish lower bounds on minimax risk using Fano's inequality, yielding bounds in terms of relative entropy and covering and packing numbers. This manuscript contains preprint of a chapter under consideration for inclusion in the forthcoming third edition of Cover and Thomas's Elements of Information Theory, posted with permission from Wiley. It would follow the chapter posted at arXiv:2605.02989 . The table of contents of the new edition can be found at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1L-m4oQEJw1PJhoxBeMwrrBD8S_HmvzMEkPbYvS24980/edit?usp=sharing . For feedback, please contact abbas@ee.stanford.edu.