ForAug: Mitigating Biases in Image Classification via Controlled Image Compositions
Authors: Tobias Christian Nauen, Brian Moser, Federico Raue, Stanislav Frolov, Andreas Dengel
Abstract
Large-scale image classification datasets exhibit strong compositional biases: objects tend to be centered, appear at characteristic scales, and co-occur with class-specific context. By exploiting such biases, models attain high in-distribution accuracy but remain fragile under distribution shifts. To address this issue, we introduce ForAug, a controlled composition augmentation scheme that factorizes each training image into a foreground object and a background and recombines them to explicitly manipulate object position, object scale, and background identity. ForAug uses off-the-shelf segmentation and inpainting models to (i) extract the foreground and synthesize a neutral background, and (ii) paste the foreground onto diverse neutral backgrounds before applying standard strong augmentation policies. Compared to conventional augmentations and content-mixing methods, our factorization provides direct control knobs that break foreground-background correlations. Across 10 architectures, ForAug improves ImageNet top-1 accuracy by up to 6 percentage points (p.p.) and yields gains of up to 7.3 p.p. on fine-grained downstream datasets. Moreover, the same control knobs enable targeted diagnostic tests: we quantify background reliance, foreground focus, center bias, and size bias via controlled background swaps and position/scale sweeps, and show that training with ForAug substantially reduces these shortcut behaviors and significantly increases accuracy on standard distribution-shift benchmarks by up to 19 p.p. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/tobna/ForAug.
CutMix has become the de facto standard mixing augmentation, yet its label assignment rests on a flawed assumption: The area of the pasted patch faithfully reflects its semantic contribution to the mixed image. In practice, however, patches frequently land on background regions, assigning label credit to classes whose objects are not visible. The mean discrepancy of the CutMix label and the semantic object area is 21.5%. In 17% of samples an image contributes zero visible object pixels yet receives nonzero label weight. We propose Object-Aware CutMix (OA-CutMix), which corrects this bias by replacing the area-based CutMix weight with one derived from precomputed segmentation masks, assigning labels in proportion to the visible object area each image contributes to the mix. The image mixing procedure is left entirely unchanged. We evaluate OA-CutMix against 10+ static and dynamic mixing methods across 4 architectures and 6 datasets. OA-CutMix consistently achieves the highest accuracy over all tasks, outperforming even dynamic mixing methods, but at a fraction of the training-time cost. Improvements are largest for small objects, where the label bias from CutMix is greatest. Thus, correcting the label is sufficient to match or exceed the performance of methods modifying the image mixing algorithm.
Tobias Christian Nauen, Stanislav Frolov, Federico Raue +2
Labeled datasets reflect the biases of their annotation pipelines, which sometimes introduce label bias: group-conditional label errors that cause systematic performance disparities across demographic subgroups. Label bias in image segmentation remains underexplored, as even detecting it typically requires clean, unbiased annotations, which are not readily available. We present a data-centric adaptation of Confident Learning to segmentation, allowing detection of label bias directly in the training data without a clean, unbiased ground truth. By comparing the provided training labels to the model's confident predictions, we isolate directional errors that quantify the presence and nature of bias, where standard overlap metrics like Dice fail. We further show that label bias influences subgroup separability in the encoder's feature space, an artifact we leverage for bias mitigation rather than suppressing it. We evaluate three datasets, spanning from synthetic to real-life bias, showing how our framework reliably detects and mitigates bias without access to clean labels, achieving equitable performance across experimental conditions.
Classifiers based on Deep Neural Networks exhibit strong performance across domains, yet can fail catastrophically if they rely on spurious correlations, i.e., features that are predictive of the target label in the training data but are not causally linked and thus fail to generalize. For the vision domain, many such spurious correlations manifest themselves within the background of the image, where only the foreground is predictive of the class label. In this paper, we introduce Automated Background Swapping (AutoBackSwap) to reduce the reliance of classifiers on such spurious backgrounds. AutoBackSwap uses a secondary network to disentangle the foreground and background, followed by infilling to synthesize complete backgrounds, and finally combines different foregrounds and inpainted backgrounds to augment the training data. We find that patch-wise labeling of just a few hundred samples suffices to train the secondary network and automatically augment the full training dataset on challenging image classification tasks. In contrast to many previous methods, AutoBackSwap proves very effective even if there is not a single sample in the training data breaking the spurious correlation. Across a range of image classification tasks with spurious backgrounds, AutoBackSwap consistently outperforms prior methods.