Asynchronous Sharpness-Aware Minimization For Fast and Accurate Deep Learning

Recent progress in optimization research has highlighted the sharpness of the loss landscape as a key factor in narrowing the generalization gap. Motivated by this insight, Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) was proposed as a training strategy that enhances generalization. Despite the promising performance, SAM suffers from its twice computational cost due to its core algorithm requiring an extra gradient computation during the perturbation step. To overcome this limitation, we introduce Exponential Moving Average Sharpness-Aware Minimization (EMASAM), a computationally efficient variant of SAM. EMASAM does not require the loss gradient in the perturbation step. Instead, EMASAM defines the perturbation direction based on the discrepancy between the main model and the EMA shadow model. This perturbation travels away from the stable average position toward the less stable area, acting as a softer yet cheaper alternative to SAM's worst-case scenario perturbation. Moreover, since EMASAM's perturbation does not rely on noisy mini-batch gradients, it mitigates the gradient-induced instability inherent in SAM. Hence, EMASAM eliminates the need for an extra backpropagation while also preserving the generalization ability of the SAM-style training. Several experiments have been performed and confirm the efficiency and robustness of our method.

Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) enhances generalization by minimizing the maximum training loss within a predefined neighborhood around the parameters. However, its practical implementation approximates this as gradient ascent(s) followed by applying the gradient at the ascent point to update the current parameters. This practice can be justified as approximately optimizing the objective by neglecting the (full) derivative of the ascent point with respect to the current parameters. Nevertheless, a direct and intuitive understanding of why using the gradient at the ascent point to update the current parameters works superiorly is still lacking. Our work bridges this gap by proposing a novel and intuitive interpretation. We show that the gradient at the single-step ascent point, \uline{when applied to the current parameters}, provides a better approximation of the direction from the current parameters toward the maximum within the local neighborhood than the local gradient. This improved approximation thereby enables a more direct escape from the maximum within the local neighborhood. Nevertheless, our analysis further reveals two issues. First, the approximation by the gradient at the single-step ascent point is often inaccurate. Second, the approximation quality may degrade as the number of ascent steps increases. To address these limitations, we propose in this paper eXplicit Sharpness-Aware Minimization (XSAM). It tackles the first by explicitly estimating the direction of the maximum during training, while addressing the second by crafting a search space that effectively leverages the gradient information at the multi-step ascent point. XSAM features a unified formulation that applies to both single-step and multi-step settings and only incurs negligible computational overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate the consistent superiority of XSAM against existing counterparts.

The sharpness-aware minimization (SAM) algorithm and its variants, including gap guided SAM (GSAM), have been successful at improving the generalization capability of deep neural network models by finding flat local minima of the empirical loss in training. Meanwhile, it has been shown theoretically and practically that increasing the batch size or decaying the learning rate avoids sharp local minima of the empirical loss. In this paper, we consider the GSAM algorithm with increasing batch sizes or decaying learning rates, such as cosine annealing or linear learning rate, and theoretically show its convergence. Moreover, we numerically compare SAM (GSAM) with and without an increasing batch size and conclude that using an increasing batch size { achieves a lower worst-case $\ell_\infty$ adaptive sharpness} than compared with using a constant batch size and learning rate.