Evaluating Deep Learning and Traditional Approaches Used in Source Camera Identification

Most Deepfake detectors report near-perfect AUC scores on their reference benchmarks. However, a recent ICML position paper argues that these evaluations collectively neglect the impact of modern smartphone photography: the widely used on-device neural image-signal processing pipelines (like multi-sensor fusion or noise and motion-blur suppression) increasingly shift the imaging paradigm from simple lens projections towards computational photography. Hence, devices actually generate, rather than record photos. This increases the risk that deepfake detectors may flag ordinary phone photos as fake. Due to the lack of large-scale datasets containing images from modern smartphones, this hypothesis has so far only been tested in small proof-of-concept studies. The aim of this paper is to close this gap. We introduce LAION-Mobile, an open dataset containing about 1 million smartphone images with EXIF metadata distilled from re-LAION-5B. Evaluating twelve state-of-the-art deepfake detectors with their original paper checkpoints on a 9,115-image evaluation sample of this pool (DIRE on 738), we report three key findings: (i) On modern AI content no detector exceeds AUC 0.624, and five of twelve fall below chance. (ii) Real-photo false-alarm rates are an artefact of threshold calibration: thresholds fitted on legacy GAN data make several detectors look deployable (less than 11 percent FPR), yet the same detectors flag 17-91 percent of real photos once the identical criterion is refit on modern content. (iii) Consequently, no detector both beats chance on modern AI content and keeps a deployable real-photo false-alarm rate. Mirroring the device mix of web collections, the corpus probes the first neural-ISP generation (2018-2020); current flagships are essentially absent, leaving the modern-ISP regime as the open gap.

Photo Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU) is widely regarded as the most reliable marker for source camera identification. Recent studies, however, report high correlations between images and fingerprints from different modern smartphones, which calls into question the discriminative power of PRNU on these devices. Using 30 recent smartphones under controlled acquisition conditions (e.g., no digital zoom), we investigate whether the fingerprint itself is at fault or the way it is compared. We find that a component shared by all fingerprints of the same model inflates the standard signed peak-to-correlation energy (sPCE). To counter this, we propose $Δ$sPCE: the sPCE between a query image and a candidate camera's fingerprint, minus the mean sPCE between that image and the fingerprints of the remaining candidates, in the spirit of T-norm score normalization. $Δ$sPCE improves attribution accuracy, suggesting that the device-specific PRNU signal is still present. Although the limited dataset size and the dependence of $Δ$sPCE on the candidate camera set currently restrict operational applicability, these results suggest that PRNU-based attribution of modern smartphones remains feasible when fingerprints are compared appropriately.

With the rapid advancement of deep generative models, realistic fake images have become increasingly accessible, yet existing localization methods rely on complex designs and still struggle to generalize across manipulation types and imaging conditions. We present a simple but strong baseline based on DINOv3 with LoRA adaptation and a lightweight convolutional decoder. Under the CAT-Net protocol, our best model improves average pixel-level F1 by 17.0 points over the previous state of the art on four standard benchmarks using only 9.1,M trainable parameters on top of a frozen ViT-L backbone, and even our smallest variant surpasses all prior specialized methods. LoRA consistently outperforms full fine-tuning across all backbone scales. Under the data-scarce MVSS-Net protocol, LoRA reaches an average F1 of 0.774 versus 0.530 for the strongest prior method, while full fine-tuning becomes highly unstable, suggesting that pre-trained representations encode forensic information that is better preserved than overwritten. The baseline also exhibits strong robustness to Gaussian noise, JPEG re-compression, and Gaussian blur. We hope this work can serve as a reliable baseline for the research community and a practical starting point for future image-forensic applications. Code is available at https://github.com/Irennnne/DINOv3-IML.