Mixed Data Clustering Survey and Challenges

Clustering mixed tabular data requires a unified metric space to bridge the inherent heterogeneity between continuous numerical measurements and discrete categorical symbols. Traditionally, algorithms rely entirely on dataset-internal statistics to estimate categorical relationships, which confines the learned metric to empirical co-occurrences and ignores conceptually obvious yet statistically unobserved affinities. Although LLMs offer external world knowledge, applying their text-centric reasoning to highly abstract tabular concepts presents significant challenges. Bridging this modality gap to construct a semantically complete metric typically requires embedding LLMs into iterative metric learning loops to dynamically optimize cross-modality representations. This incurs intractable computational overhead, forcing a compromise between semantic enrichment and scalability. Therefore, we propose GRACE, an LLM-grounded framework for scalable mixed-data clustering. GRACE shifts semantic acquisition to the attribute-value level via a multi-perspective LLM querying strategy, mapping heterogeneous values into knowledge-informed descriptions. Crucially, this one-shot grounding extracts general-purpose semantic representations that embed heterogeneous attributes into a unified space, decoupling expensive LLM invocation from iterative optimization. Furthermore, GRACE cross-validates these external semantics against dataset-internal statistical evidence to ensure alignment with the dataset-specific cluster structure. Ultimately, GRACE matches the scalability of conventional statistics-driven baselines while achieving superior clustering accuracy and conceptual interpretability over 11 competing methods. The source code is available at https://github.com/develop-yang/GRACE-GRACE-A

Clustering is a fundamental problem in data science with a long-standing research history, yielding numerous insightful algorithms. Despite this progress, a systematic and large-scale empirical evaluation that jointly considers conventional algorithms, deep learning-based methods, and recent foundation model-based clustering remains largely absent, leading to limited guidance on algorithm selection and deployment. To address this gap, we introduce CLUBench, a comprehensive clustering benchmark comprising 24 algorithms of diverse principles evaluated on 131 datasets across tabular, text, and image data, involving 178,815 experiments. Importantly, our analyses of (i) the impact of hyperparameter tuning,(ii) the impact of data types and characteristics,(iii) the impact of pretrained embeddings,(iv) large language model-based clustering,(v) the similarity of algorithms, and (vi) the low-rank structures of performance matrices, yield meaningful insights and promising pathways for clustering research. For instance, our study reveals that: 1) All evaluated deep clustering methods do not exhibit a significant advantage compared with the top-performing conventional clustering algorithms (e.g., KMeans, SpeClu) in terms of average performance; 2) For image and text clustering tasks, combining pretrained embeddings with conventional clustering algorithms (e.g., KMeans, SpeClu) offers effective and efficient clustering; 3) Clustering remains a challenging and nontrivial problem, even in the era of increasingly dominant foundation models. Moreover, we propose to use the low-rank structure in cross-model performance matrices to efficiently approximate the overall performance evaluation in practical applications. We further demonstrate the feasibility of model selection based on the performance matrices across all hyperparameter configurations.

In the Big Data era, the scalability of clustering algorithms constitutes a key challenge. Traditional density-based methods (e.g., DBSCAN) offer robustness to noise and the ability to detect non-linear clusters, yet their quadratic time complexity $O(N^2)$ drastically limits their applicability. Conversely, partitional algorithms (e.g., K-Means), with their linear complexity $O(N)$, impose sphericity on the resulting groups and fail in the presence of outliers. This paper presents K-SCAN -- a novel hybrid algorithm that optimizes this trade-off. The method integrates preliminary vector quantization (stochastic Mini-Batch K-Means) to extract a reduced set of weighted micro-clusters, followed by a subsequent density-based structural analysis. Empirical evaluation on datasets of up to $10^6$ samples confirms the linear computational complexity of the proposed solution. K-SCAN achieves more than a 3-fold speed-up over the hierarchical BIRCH algorithm, avoiding the costly management of tree-based structures. The method precisely identifies non-linear manifolds while maintaining structural stability (Adjusted Rand Index > 0.99), even with noise levels reaching 55% of the data volume. The main limitation of the proposed algorithm, which could not be fully eliminated in the present study, remains its susceptibility to over-smoothing and its difficulty in separating clusters with highly heterogeneous local density. In complex visual spaces, this can lead to the loss of the finest topological details.