Understanding and inverse design of implicit bias in stochastic learning: a geometric perspective

Deep learning systems are known to exhibit implicit regularization (alt. implicit bias), favoring simple solutions instead of merely minimizing the loss function. In some cases, we can analytically derive the implicit regularization -- connecting it to an equivalent penalty that augments the learning objective. However, modern deep learning systems are complex, carrying modifications to the training procedure and architecture (e.g. early stopping, minibatching, dropout) whose effects are not always directly interpretable. Although estimating the resulting implicit regularization could aid theorists in algorithm design and practitioners in interpreting their hyperparameter choices, this problem has received little direct attention. It is also tractable: regularization makes weight updates deviate from loss gradients, promising a signal for identifying implicit bias. Here we provide gradient matching methods that can be used to empirically estimate the implicit regularization. Our method works on networks with known regularization, recovering popular explicit penalties like $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$. It also replicates known implicit effects, like the quadratic weight penalty induced by early stopping in gradient descent, demonstrating that it can be used to test theories of implicit regularization. Crucially, because our method is empirical, it can handle implicit regularization in arbitrary networks. We demonstrate this use by characterizing the effects of dropout in deep networks, showing implicit $\ell_2$ effects in this popular method. Our work shows that practitioners can use gradient matching to understand regularization in networks with implicit biases that are too complicated to derive analytically.

We study the implicit bias of noisy stochastic gradient descent in training wide two-layer ReLU networks for multivariate regression. In a mean-field regime, the training dynamics are approximated by a Wasserstein gradient flow that converges to a unique stationary measure. We characterize the structure of this stationary measure and the predictor it represents. We show that, despite the network being infinitely overparameterized, the learned predictor admits an effectively finite representation: the input weights and biases align along finitely many directions, leading to an effective width collapse. In particular, the solution function is continuous piecewise affine, with affine regions determined by the cells of a finite hyperplane arrangement. The number of learned directions, and hence hyperplanes, is bounded above by $2\mathcal{P}-1$, where $\mathcal{P}$ denotes the number of linear dichotomies realizable on the training inputs. We further establish a non-redundancy property of the learned representation by proving that each learned direction induces a unique ternary activation pattern on the training data. Consequently, the complexity of the learned predictor is governed by the combinatorial geometry of the training data.

We develop a mathematically explicit link between shock-wave theory and the symmetry-quotiented learning dynamics of stochastic gradient descent, drawing on differential geometry, Lie group theory, and fluid mechanics. Specifically, after quotienting parameter symmetries and applying local-entropy coarse-graining, the effective dynamics satisfy a viscous Hamilton--Jacobi equation on the quotient manifold. Moreover, under the assumption that the raw parameter dynamics can be summarized by a gradient field on the quotiented space, the gradient of the coarse-grained loss function obeys a Burgers-type equation, and shock formation can be established rigorously. We apply our theory to multilayer perceptrons, convolutional neural networks, Transformers, and mean-field networks, and show that they obey the Hamilton--Jacobi or Burgers-type equations. We conjecture that this framework also yields practical diagnostics for deep learning. In architectures such as Transformers, raw parameter norms are often distorted by symmetry redundancy and may therefore be misleading, whereas symmetry-corrected quotient observables provide a principled basis for monitoring, forecasting, and controlling training-phase transitions.