Organizations: aDepartment of Systems Science, School of Engineering Science, The University of Osaka, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan · bDepartment of Systems Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering Science, The University of Osaka, 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan · cMicrosoft Research Asia, Shinagawa, Tokyo, Japan · dIndustrial Cyber-physical Systems Research Center, The National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2-3-26 Aomi, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Human-robot collaborative assembly requires robots to interpret ambiguous corrective instructions while producing physically executable motions. Vision-language models (VLMs) provide semantic reasoning but may select logically inconsistent targets or misjudge execution outcomes. We propose a replanning framework that maps human instructions to Action Target candidates, including grasp poses and tool selections, and combines an Internal Correction Model for pre-execution logical verification with an External Correction Model for post-execution visual verification. The framework integrates VLM reasoning with 6-DoF grasp generation and collision-free trajectory planning. Simulation ablations show configuration-dependent effects: internal correction improves candidate validity, whereas external correction enables recovery for a low-latency VLM but can reduce success when visual verification produces false negatives. Experiments with an upper-body humanoid robot achieved 66.7% success in real-world object fixation, 100% in initial tool selection, and 75.0% in corrective tool selection. These results demonstrate interactive replanning across spatial and semantic collaborative tasks while identifying visual-state verification as a key limitation.
This paper presents a distributed conversational framework for human-robot collaborative manipulation that integrates local language and vision-language models (VLMs) with a Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2)-based execution stack. Language understanding, visual grounding, orchestration, and motion execution run as separate ROS 2 nodes, enabling flexible deployment across distributed hardware while maintaining a responsive control loop. From free-form user commands, the system generates structured action requests for pick, place, and handover. It uses a VLM to return image-space targets, which are converted into metric robot-frame goals using depth and calibration. A web dashboard exposes intermediate intent and grounding overlays (pixel, depth, and robot-frame) and requires explicit operator confirmation before any motion is executed. Experiments on a Franka FR3 platform evaluate end-to-end task reliability and latency under increasing working table scene ambiguity and compare alternative LLM/VLM configurations in the same pipeline. Code and full documentation are available at github.com/cogrob-tuni/franka-llm.
Robots operating in diverse environments rely on visual input to interpret objects and spatial layouts. In human-collaborative tasks, they are expected to communicate this understanding through language. Vision-language models (VLMs) support robotic tasks involving visual interpretation, question answering, and instruction following, but their capabilities in collaborative dialogue tasks requiring spatial reasoning remain underexplored. We study this gap through a collaborative structure-building task that combines visual interpretation, grounding, language-guided interaction, and action generation. We develop a framework in which VLMs use dialogue to reconstruct a target structure from visual and textual inputs. We evaluate open-weight and closed VLMs across interaction settings, input modalities, and image representations. Results show that spatial reasoning over visual representations remains difficult for the evaluated VLMs. Detailed text representations of the target yield higher reconstruction success across modality conditions, while decomposed image representations improve performance. These findings reveal limits in visual spatial grounding and grounded instruction generation for collaborative VLM agents.
Chalamalasetti Kranti, Sherzod Hakimov, David Schlangen
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate strong semantic understanding yet exhibit systematic failures during deployment. The conditions under which these failures occur, and whether they can be corrected without retraining, remain poorly understood. In this paper, we take steps toward addressing this gap. We present CorrectVLA, a framework that translates task-level natural language corrections into additive action magnitude adjustments without modifying policy weights. A human provides a single task-level correction, applied uniformly across all rollouts without per-episode intervention. In simulation, CorrectVLA recovers execution misalignment failures across both in-distribution and OOD tasks. In real-robot experiments on a UFactory xArm7 under environment shift, CorrectVLA restores near-perfect success where the base policy almost entirely breaks down, generalizing across object locations and identities. Through a taxonomy of failure modes on LIBERO-90, we find that execution misalignment failures, where the policy reaches the correct target but miscalibrates action magnitudes, represent the correctable subset, while other failure modes where semantic comprehension itself breaks down are not amenable to this approach. The approach succeeds when policies possess strategic correctness and fails when fundamental comprehension is absent, establishing a practical operational boundary for inference-time correction.