Improving LLM Reliability through Hybrid Abstention and Adaptive Detection
Organizations: Department of Computer Science & Engineering, Chhattisgarh Swami Vivekanand Technical University, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in production environments face a fundamental safety-utility trade-off either a strict filtering mechanisms prevent harmful outputs but often block benign queries or a relaxed controls risk unsafe content generation. Conventional guardrails based on static rules or fixed confidence thresholds are typically context-insensitive and computationally expensive, resulting in high latency and degraded user experience. To address these limitations, we introduce an adaptive abstention system that dynamically adjusts safety thresholds based on real-time contextual signals such as domain and user history. The proposed framework integrates a multi-dimensional detection architecture composed of five parallel detectors, combined through a hierarchical cascade mechanism to optimize both speed and precision. The cascade design reduces unnecessary computation by progressively filtering queries, achieving substantial latency improvements compared to non-cascaded models and external guardrail systems. Extensive evaluation on mixed and domain-specific workloads demonstrates significant reductions in false positives, particularly in sensitive domains such as medical advice and creative writing. The system maintains high safety precision and near-perfect recall under strict operating modes. Overall, our context-aware abstention framework effectively balances safety and utility while preserving performance, offering a scalable solution for reliable LLM deployment.
Figures & tables
| Work | Primary Focus | Model Modification Required | Decision Signal | Context Awareness | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ 1 ] | Survey and taxonomy of abstention | No | Conceptual categorization | Identifies context-aware abstention as open challenge | Does not propose implementation |
| [ 2 ] | Learned refusal behavior | Yes (fine-tuning) | Internal refusal training | Limited | Model-specific; retraining required |
| [ 3 ] | Decoupled refusal training | Yes (fine-tuning) | Position-aware refusal modeling | Limited | Requires architectural adaptation |
| [ 4 ] | Uncertainty-based abstention | No | Scalar uncertainty (entropy, perplexity, variance) | No (global threshold) | Single-dimensional signal; brittle calibration |
| [ 5 ] | Chain-of-thought consistency | No | Query reconstruction consistency | Partial (reasoning context) | Limited to reasoning tasks |
| [ 6 ] | Adversarial refusal robustness | Yes (adversarial training) | Strengthened refusal features | No | Training overhead; attack-specific |
| Metric | Static | Adaptive | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | 0.75 | 0.95 | +26.7% |
| Recall | 0.80 | 0.98 | +22.5% |
| F1 Score | 0.77 | 0.96 | +24.7% |
| False Positives | 15 | 3 | -80% |
LLM Guardrails
Large language model guardrails detect or constrain harmful outputs, prompt attacks, and unsafe agent actions before they cause harm.
See all 194 papers