Organizations: School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an, China · College of Computer and Information, Hohai University, Nanjing, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi’an, China · Institute for Infocomm Research, A*STAR, Singapore
LVLMs have achieved strong multimodal reasoning capabilities but remain prone to hallucinations, producing outputs inconsistent with visual inputs or user instructions. Existing training-free methods, including contrastive decoding and auxiliary expert models, which incur several times more computational overhead and may introduce potential interference, as well as static internal signal enhancement, are often vulnerable to the attention sink phenomenon. We find that internal Positive Attention Dynamics (PAD) in LVLMs naturally reveal semantically core visual regions under the distortions of attention sinks. Based on this, we propose Positive Attention Dynamics Enhancement (PADE), a training-free attention intervention that constructs a PAD map to identify semantically core visual regions, applies per-head Median Absolute Deviation Scaling to adaptively control the intervention strength, and leverages System-Token Compensation to maintain attention to complex user instructions and support long-term output consistency. Experiments on multiple LVLMs and benchmarks show that PADE improves visual grounding and reduces hallucinations, validating the effectiveness of leveraging internal attention dynamics for reliable multimodal reasoning.
Figure 2: Static versus dynamic internal attention signals. Static mean attention is dominated by attention sinks, while Positive Attention Dynamics (PAD) more reliably highlight semantically core visual regions.
Figure 3: Attention analysis of LLaVA-1.5-7B (left) and 13B (right). Top: the attention ratio of different token types (System, Vision, Instruction, Output). Bottom: heatmap visualizations of attention distributions, including (a) static attention from uniformly sampled layers, (b) layer-averaged static attention, and (c) positive attention dynamics.
Figure 4: Overview of our PADE. PADE identifies semantically core visual regions via Positive Attention Dynamics (PAD) and selectively enhances them in the target layer, with Median Absolute Deviation Scaling for adaptively controlling the intervention strength and System-Token Compensation to preserve attention for understanding complex instructions and ensuring consistent long-term generation.
Setup
Method
LLaVA-1.5
InstructBLIP
Qwen-VL
LLaVA-1.5-13B
LLaVA-Next
Accuracy ↑
F1 ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1 ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1 ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1 ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1 ↑
Random
Vanilla
84.63
84.99
83.33
83.57
85.17
83.00
83.27
84.27
84.23
82.14
VCD
84.57
85.02
84.60
84.49
84.69
82.91
83.47
84.52
83.48
81.36
PAI
85.12
85.64
83.82
83.98
85.63
83.74
84.06
84.98
83.76
81.52
VAF
85.64
85.82
85.12
85.28
85.93
84.08
84.32
85.28
84.84
82.64
VAR
86.12
86.56
85.62
85.71
86.54
84.66
84.82
85.76
85.12
83.26
Table 1: Results on the POPE (Accuracy and F1). ↑ indicates that higher is better. Best results are bolded .
Method
LLaVA-1.5
InstructBLIP
Qwen-VL
LLaVA-1.5-13B
LLaVA-Next
CHAIR S ↓
CHAIR I ↓
CHAIR S ↓
CHAIR I ↓
CHAIR S ↓
CHAIR I ↓
CHAIR S ↓
CHAIR I ↓
CHAIR S ↓
CHAIR I ↓
Vanilla
55.1
16.4
57.4
17.6
52.1
16.7
50.4
14.7
30.2
10.9
VCD
54.4
16.6
60.7
18.0
50.4
17.2
49.6
14.3
29.8
10.6
M3ID
56.6
15.8
62.3
18.2
49.8
17.4
—
—
—
—
Woodpecker
57.6
16.7
60.8
17.6
51.8
16.3
—
—
—
—
HALC
51.0
14.8
53.8
15.7
49.6
15.4
—
—
—
—
Table 2: Results on CHAIR (Max Token 128). ↓ denotes lower is better. – denotes unavailable results.
Methods
VizWiz
MME
LLaVA-Wild
MM-Vet
Accuracy ↑
Perception ↑
Cognition ↑
Overall ↑
Average ↑
Total ↑
Vanilla
50.00
1508.97
355.71
1864.68
64.80
31.1
VCD
44.90
1515.01
357.86
1872.87
63.21
30.2
ICD
37.62
1306.91
287.86
1594.77
56.90
25.9
OPERA
50.76
1473.62
310.71
1784.34
64.31
32.0
INTER
48.77
1502.35
336.18
1838.53
61.70
30.9
Table 3: Results on multiple general vision language benchmarks. ↑ indicates that higher is better.
Methods
fACC ↑
qACC ↑
easy A ↑
hard A ↑
Vanilla
17.9
8.13
36.0
36.7
VCD
13.9
11.4
33.0
34.7
ICD
13.9
8.35
36.9
33.5
OPERA
16.2
5.49
37.6
35.4
INTER
15.8
8.21
36.9
34.5
V-ITI
17.9
10.27
36.6
37.0
Table 4: Results on the HallusionBench.
Method
CHAIR ( ↓ )
Cover ( ↑ )
Hall ( ↓ )
Cog ( ↓ )
Vanilla
7.8
51.0
36.4
4.2
VCD
7.5
50.8
36.2
4.1
OPERA
7.3
49.6
32.0
3.5
DoLA
7.6
51.6
36.0
4.0
PAI
7.4
49.9
33.2
3.7
PADE (ours)
7.1
51.8
31.4
3.4
Table 5: Results on AMBER Generative Subset.
Model
Components
CHAIR S ↓
CHAIR I ↓
LLaVA-1.5-7B
PADE
48.6
13.7
w/o MAD
54.9
16.3
w/o STC
49.2
14.0
LLaVA-1.5-13B
PADE
47.9
12.8
w/o MAD
50.3
14.5
w/o STC
48.6
13.3
Table 6: Ablation results on the proposed components.
Figure 5: Ablation results on the intervention layer and strength λ of LLaVA-1.5-7B (top) and 13B (bottom).
Appendix figures & tables5 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 6: Direction hallucination in open-ended long-term generation. Although the model attends to the dog throughout generation, it incorrectly describes the running direction as towards the water, while the dog is in fact moving away from it. A substantial portion of attention is absorbed by several semantically irrelevant sink tokens, especially in later layers, diluting the focus on the dog region. Positive Attention Dynamics (PAD) captures consistent attention changes concentrated around the dog region across layers. When applied at later layers, PADE selectively reinforces this core region after attention diffusion, correcting the directional hallucination.
Figure 7: Object existence hallucination in a cluttered scene. The image contains multiple objects, including several cups and a visually dominant bottle. Due to the presence of multiple salient objects, visual attention becomes fragmented, and smaller target objects such as the cups receive substantially less attention than the large bottle. Although both the cups and the bottle are attended to at intermediate layers, attention gradually diffuses away from semantically relevant regions, and sink tokens increasingly dominate the final-layer attention map, causing the cup regions to become inconspicuous. PAD captures the transient attention concentration on the cup regions before diffusion occurs, enabling PADE to re-emphasize these small but semantically critical regions in later layers and correctly recognize the existence of cups, thereby mitigating the hallucinated judgment.
Figure 8: Object existence hallucination for a small target. The phone occupies a relatively small visual region, resulting in weak and sparse attention signals. In later layers, attention disperses from the phone region and becomes highly imbalanced, with sink tokens dominating the distribution. Despite the absence of strong static attention, PAD identifies consistent attention dynamics localized around the phone region. By reinforcing this region at later layers, PADE restores visual grounding and alleviates the hallucination.
Figure 9: Object existence hallucination under occlusion and prompt variation. The bag is partially occluded and occupies a small visible area, leading to weak static attention signals. As attention diffuses in later layers, sink tokens dominate the distribution, resulting in hallucinated responses. PAD captures coherent attention dynamics around the hand and bag regions across layers and enables PADE to selectively enhance these regions in the target layer. This figure shares the same image as Figure 8 but uses a different user instruction (bag vs. phone). Both prompts exhibit similar sink-dominated attention patterns and hallucination behaviors, indicating that such failures arise from intrinsic LVLM attention dynamics rather than prompt-specific artifacts. PADE consistently leverages attention evolution to recover semantically core regions and mitigate hallucinations across prompts.
Figure 10: Comparison of static mean attention and positive attention dynamics during the generation of different tokens. (a) Original model output. (b) Static mean attention. (c) Positive Attention Dynamics (PAD). (d) Output after applying PADE, where semantically core regions are enhanced via PAD. Across all tokens, PAD more reliably highlights semantically core visual regions than static attention. In particular, when generating tokens corresponding to key objects (e.g., “apple”) and attributes (e.g., “red”), attention changes are most strongly concentrated on the apple region. These results demonstrate that PAD effectively captures semantically relevant visual areas and validate the effectiveness of PADE in reinforcing core visual regions for reliable multimodal understanding.
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) excel at multimodal tasks but remain prone to object hallucinations. Prior training-free remedies often uniformly strengthen visual signals, which may also amplify irrelevant regions and introduce spurious evidence, harming fluency. We propose Context-aware Attention Intervention (CAI), a training-free inference-time mechanism that enforces a see only when needed principle via two-axis selectivity: where to look and when to intervene. At each decoding step, CAI derives token-specific visual relevance from early-layer representations to localize semantically aligned regions, and applies a conservative, entropy- and depth-gated attention tilt only for uncertainty-spiking tokens in deeper layers where visual grounding degrades, leaving confident tokens and irrelevant regions largely unchanged. This targeted intervention strengthens visual grounding while preserving linguistic fluency, and it yields consistent improvements even without contrastive decoding, which remains optional as an auxiliary bias-suppression module. Extensive experiments across multiple LVLM backbones and benchmarks show that CAI achieves state-of-the-art hallucination mitigation, and our analysis characterizes CAI as a KL-minimal attention reweighting with bounded interference under inactive gates or small tilts. Code is available at https://github.com/Iris1946/CAI.
Yuqing Lei, Wenbo Lyu, Yingjun Du +3
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · University of Amsterdam · United Imaging Healthcare Co., Ltd.
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in multimodal understanding. However, they remain prone to hallucinations, generating responses that are inconsistent with the visual evidence. Existing mitigation methods largely address language-prior bias or cross-modal imbalance, while progressive visual degradation across perception and memory remains underexplored. In this work, we propose Saliency-Driven Perceptual Realignment (SDPR), a training-free framework that mitigates the degradation of visual awareness throughout inference. Specifically, we first introduce saliency-driven attention redistribution to release attention hijacked by non-semantic sink tokens, thereby recovering critical visual evidence. Second, we identify spatial distortion in the KV cache and propose saliency-driven cache alignment to preserve query-relevant visual features during generation. Finally, we introduce prior-constrained contrastive decoding to penalize unfaithful predictions induced by dominant language priors. Our proposed SDPR is robust against hallucinations due to its holistic alignment of visual awareness across the entire generative trajectory. Extensive experiments across diverse LVLM architectures show that SDPR outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both hallucination and general-purpose benchmarks, requiring no additional training and incurring minimal runtime overhead. The code is available blue{here}.
Pengxu Chen, Yao Zhu, Guangming Zhu +4
Xidian University Xi’an, China · Tsinghua University Beijing, China · Shanghai Road Transport Development Center Shanghai, China +1
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have shown remarkable performance on a wide range of vision-language tasks. Despite this progress, they are still prone to hallucination, generating responses that are inconsistent with visual content. In this work, we find that LVLMs tend to hallucinate when they pay insufficient attention to the correct visual evidence and gradually forget it during the generation process. We empirically find that although LVLMs overall attend insufficiently to visual evidence, they exhibit sensitivity to the correct visual evidence in specific layers, with notable inter-layer discrepancy. Motivated by this observation, we propose a novel hallucination mitigation method that enhances visual evidence based on Inter-Layer Visual Attention Discrepancy (ILVAD). Specifically, we obtain the attention weights from early generated tokens to visual tokens across layers and identify the tokens that are repeatedly activated as visual evidence, forming a saliency map. We then enhance attention to visual evidence during generation through the saliency map to reduce visual forgetting. In addition, we leverage the saliency map to obtain attention scores of generated text to visual evidence, in order to select and emphasize text tokens that are strongly grounded in visual evidence. Our method is training-free and plug-and-play. Multiple benchmark evaluations conducted on five recently released models show that our method can consistently mitigate hallucinations in different LVLMs over various architectures. Code is available at https://github.com/ytx-ML/ILVAD.
Yutong Xie, Zhenglin Hua, Ran Wang +3
School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China · National Engineering Laboratory for Big Data Systems Computing Technology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China +3