Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) requires models to answer questions by integrating visual information with external knowledge. However, retrieved knowledge is often noisy, partially irrelevant, or misaligned with the visual content, while internal model knowledge is difficult to control and interpret. Naive aggregation of these sources limits reasoning effectiveness and reduces answer accuracy. To address this, we propose MaS-VQA, a selection-driven framework that tightly couples explicit knowledge filtering with implicit knowledge reasoning. MaS-VQA first retrieves candidate passages and applies a Mask-and-Select mechanism to jointly prune irrelevant image regions and weakly relevant knowledge fragments, producing compact, high-signal multimodal knowledge . This filtered knowledge then guides the activation of internal knowledge in a constrained semantic space, enabling complementary co-modeling of explicit and implicit knowledge for robust answer prediction. Experiments on Encyclopedic-VQA and InfoSeek demonstrate consistent performance gains across multiple MLLM backbones, and ablations verify that the selection mechanism effectively reduces noise and enhances knowledge utilization.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: A comparison of vanilla KB-VQA and our proposed method. Compared to standard hybrid methods that separate explicit and implicit knowledge, MaS-VQA integrates their reasoning.
Figure 2: Overview of MaS-VQA. Given an image–question pair, MaS-VQA retrieves top- k passages from an external knowledge base and performs Mask-and-Select explicit knowledge processing, including a knowledge-guided attention mask for filtering irrelevant image regions and question-conditioned phrase selection for pruning noisy text. The filtered multimodal evidence is then used for implicit knowledge processing to elicit complementary model-internal knowledge, and both knowledge sources are co-modeled for final answer prediction.
Method
Model
Retrieval Mode
E-VQA
InfoSeek
Single-Hop
All
Unseen-Q
Unseen-E
All
Zero-shot MLLMs
BLIP-2 ( Li et al., 2023 )
Flan-T5 XL
-
12.6
12.4
12.7
12.3
12.5
InternVL3-8B ( Zhu et al., 2025 )
InternVL3-8B
-
15.7
15.9
13.5
11.7
12.5
Qwen2.5-VL-7B ( Bai et al., 2025b )
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
-
16.3
16.3
16.8
15.8
16.3
Qwen3-VL-8B ( Bai et al., 2025a )
Qwen3-VL-8B
-
19.5
19.5
19.7
17.4
18.5
Table 1: Performance on the Encyclopedic-VQA test set and the InfoSeek validation set. Best results are highlighted in bold. ∗ denotes methods that require additional training during the reasoning stage. † denotes results that are not directly comparable due to differences in the underlying knowledge bases. ◊ denotes our reproductions using different MLLM backbones.
Explicit Knowledge
Implicit Knowledge
E-VQA
Attention Mask
Phrase Selection
Single-Hop
All
✓
39.8
36.8
✓
38.5
36.6
✓
✓
40.9
38.4
✓
40
35.9
✓
✓
✓
42.2
41.3
Table 2: Ablation study on Encyclopedic-VQA (test) assessing the impact of attention masking, phrase selection, and implicit knowledge. Best results are highlighted in bold.
k
E-VQA
Single-Hop
All
1
35.1
31.6
3
39.5
36.7
5
42.2
41.3
7
41.8
41.1
Table 3: Effect of retrieval breadth on Encyclopedic-VQA. MaS-VQA performance as the number of retrieved passages k varies. The retriever and MLLM backbone are fixed; only k is changed.
Figure 3: Qualitative case studies. Left: explicit external knowledge helps bridge missing factual gaps and corrects errors made without retrieval. Right: implicit knowledge complements retrieved evidence when the final decision requires commonsense/domain priors beyond the retrieved text.
Figure 4: Implicit Knowledge Processing complements explicit evidence. Even with filtered explicit knowledge, some questions require additional commonsense/domain priors. Our implicit knowledge processing elicits such parametric knowledge conditioned on the selected evidence, enabling correct reasoning and answers.
Figure 5: Implicit Knowledge Processing complements explicit evidence. Even with filtered explicit knowledge, some questions require additional commonsense/domain priors. Our implicit knowledge processing elicits such parametric knowledge conditioned on the selected evidence, enabling correct reasoning and answers.
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Split
Question Type
#Questions
Total
E-VQA Test
Single-Hop
Templated
1000
5750
Automatic
2750
Multi-answer
1000
Two-Hop
–
1000
InfoSeek Val
–
–
71335
71335
Appendix
Table 4: Dataset statistics of the Encyclopedic-VQA test set and the InfoSeek validation set.
Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) requires models to combine image understanding with external knowledge. Most prior methods use a fixed retrieve-then-generate pipeline with a pre-selected retriever and a static top-k setting, which is not adaptive during reasoning. We propose ProMSA, a progressive multimodal search agent for KB-VQA. Given an image-question pair, the agent iteratively chooses image search, text search, or stop, under explicit tool-call budgets and with deduplication to avoid redundant retrieval. For training, we first use rejection-sampling SFT to learn valid tool-use formats, then optimize the agent with TN-GSPO, a sequence-level RL objective that normalizes updates by both generation length and tool-interaction depth. Experiments on E-VQA and InfoSeek show consistent gains over strong RAG and agent baselines, and improved retrieval and end-to-end accuracy. The code is available at https://github.com/DingWu1021/Promsa.
ZhengXian Wu, Hangrui Xu, Kai Shi +8
OPPO AI Center, OPPO Inc. China · The Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University · Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
Multi-modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a highly effective paradigm for Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA). Despite recent advancements, prevailing methods still primarily depend on images as the retrieval key, and often overlook or misplace the role of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), thereby failing to leverage their potential fully. In this paper, we introduce WikiSeeker, a novel multi-modal RAG framework that bridges these gaps by proposing a multi-modal retriever and redefining the role of VLMs. Rather than serving merely as answer generators, we assign VLMs two specialized agents: a Refiner and an Inspector. The Refiner utilizes the capability of VLMs to rewrite the textual query according to the input image, significantly improving the performance of the multimodal retriever. The Inspector facilitates a decoupled generation strategy by selectively routing reliable retrieved context to another LLM for answer generation, while relying on the VLM's internal knowledge when retrieval is unreliable. Extensive experiments on EVQA, InfoSeek, and M2KR demonstrate that WikiSeeker achieves state-of-the-art performance, with substantial improvements in both retrieval accuracy and answer quality. Our code will be released on https://github.com/zhuyjan/WikiSeeker.
Yingjian Zhu, Xinming Wang, Kun Ding +3
School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences · State Key Laboratory of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Systems (MAIS), Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · School of Artificial Intelligence, University of Science and Technology Beijing
Knowledge-based visual question answering (KB-VQA) requires vision-language models to understand images and use external knowledge, especially for rare entities and long-tail facts. Most existing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) methods adopt a fixed pipeline that sequentially retrieves information, filters it, and then produces an answer. Such a design makes it difficult to adapt to diverse question types. Moreover, it separates retrieval from reasoning, making it hard for the model to decide when to search, how to refine queries, or when to stop. As a result, the retrieved evidence is often poorly aligned with the question. To address these limitations, we reformulate KB-VQA as a search-agent problem and model the solving process as a multi-step decision-making procedure. At each step, the agent selects one of four actions-Answer, Image Retrieval, Text Retrieval, and Caption-based on its current information state. We further design an automated pipeline to collect multi-step trajectories that record the agent's reasoning process, tool usage, and intermediate decisions. These trajectories are then used as supervision for fine-tuning. Experiments on InfoSeek and E-VQA demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, consistently outperforming prior baselines and confirming the effectiveness of our framework.
Zhuohong Chen, Zhenxian Wu, Yunyao Yu +6
Tsinghua University · Hefei University of Technology · University of Arizona