cs.LGFeb 6, 2026

MIDAS: Mosaic Input-Specific Differentiable Architecture Search

Authors: Konstanty Subbotko

Organizations: Independent Researcher

Abstract

Differentiable Neural Architecture Search (NAS) provides efficient, gradient-based methods for automatically designing neural networks, yet its adoption remains limited in practice. We present MIDAS, an approach that modernizes DARTS by replacing static architecture parameters with dynamic, input-specific parameters computed via self-attention. To improve robustness, MIDAS (i) localizes the architecture selection by computing it separately for each spatial patch of the activation map, and (ii) introduces a parameter-free, topology-aware search space that models the two-edge node topology during search. We evaluate MIDAS on the DARTS, NAS-Bench-201, and RDARTS search spaces. In DARTS, it reaches 97.42% top-1 on CIFAR-10 and 83.38% on CIFAR-100. In NAS-Bench-201, it discovers optimal or near-optimal architectures. In RDARTS, it achieves the best reported performance among the compared methods on two of four search spaces on CIFAR-10. We further analyze why MIDAS works, showing that patchwise attention improves discrimination among candidate operations and that the resulting input-specific parameter distributions are class-aware.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables4 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Aug 14, 2026

LP-NAS: Linear Programming-based Neural Architecture Search

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) aims to automate neural network architecture design, reducing reliance on human expertise. Among the various NAS methods, differentiable NAS has gained prominence due to its efficiency and accuracy compared to conventional NAS approaches. Since differentiable NAS relaxes the architecture search space into a continuous domain, it is possible to apply principles from continuous optimization to NAS. In this paper, we propose Linear Programming-based NAS (LP-NAS), a mathematical programming-based framework for differentiable NAS that is applicable to a wide range of continuous search spaces. LP-NAS formulates a linear program (LP) using the validation-loss gradient and the training-loss Hessian to compute an architecture update direction that improves generalization while preserving the optimality of the model parameters. By following this LP-derived descent direction, LP-NAS efficiently navigates the architecture search space, leading to faster and more effective architecture optimization. We introduce two computationally efficient variants of LP-NAS, namely S-LP-NAS and R-LP-NAS. Applying LP-NAS to the Differentiable Architecture Search (DARTS) search space results in two algorithmic variants, S-LP-DARTS and R-LP-DARTS. Both variants achieve faster convergence and significantly higher validation performance during the early search iterations than the standard DARTS algorithm. Extensive experiments on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 show that LP-DARTS outperforms standard DARTS in both the architecture search and evaluation phases. Additionally, we compare our approach with several DARTS variants (P-DARTS, PC-DARTS, and STO-DARTS) on the CIFAR-10 dataset and demonstrate its effectiveness. Furthermore, we validate the transferability of the discovered architectures through experiments on the ImageNet dataset.
Apr 1, 2026

G-ICSO-NAS: Shifting Gears between Gradient and Swarm for Robust Neural Architecture Search

Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has become a pivotal technique in automated machine learning. Evolutionary Algorithm (EA)-based methods demonstrate superior search quality but suffer from prohibitive computational costs, while gradient-based approaches like DARTS offer high efficiency but are prone to premature convergence and performance collapse. To bridge this gap, we propose G-ICSO-NAS, a hybrid framework implementing a three-stage optimization strategy. The Warm-up Phase pre-trains supernet weights (ww) via differentiable methods while architecture parameters (αα) remain frozen. The Exploration Phase adopts a hybrid co-optimization mechanism: an Improved Competitive Swarm Optimizer (ICSO) with diversity-aware fitness navigates the architecture space to update αα, while gradient descent concurrently updates ww. The Stability Phase employs fine-grained gradient-based search with early stopping to converge to the optimal architecture. By synergizing ICSO's global navigation capability with differentiable methods' efficiency, G-ICSO-NAS achieves remarkable performance with minimal cost. In the context of the DARTS search space, an accuracy of 97.46% is achieved on CIFAR-10 with a computational budget of just 0.15 GPU-Days. The method also exhibits strong transfer potential, recording accuracies of 83.1% (CIFAR-100) and 75.02% (ImageNet). Furthermore, regarding the NAS-Bench-201 benchmark, G-ICSO-NAS is shown to deliver state-of-the-art results across all evaluated datasets.
May 19, 2026

Structuring Open-Ended NAS: Semi-Automated Design Knowledge Structuring with LLMs for Efficient Neural Architecture Search

Current neural architecture search (NAS) methods are often limited by their predefined, restrictive search spaces. While recent large language model (LLM)-assisted NAS methods enable open-ended search spaces, they often suffer from inefficient exploration due to biased or low-quality design ideas. To address these issues, we propose to semi-automatically structure model design knowledge to guide the search process. Our approach first defines a high-level structural template of architectural attributes. An LLM then populates this template by analyzing papers, creating a rich and diverse search space that embodies this structured design knowledge. To efficiently explore this vast space, we introduce FairNAD, using a multi-type mutation that enables broad exploration through mutation with fair idea sampling, Pareto-aware mutation, LLM-driven iterative mutation, and a fine-grained feedback loop. We demonstrate the effectiveness of FairNAD in discovering high-performing architectures that yield 0.84, 2.17, and 2.35 points improvement on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and ImageNet16-120, respectively, compared to current state-of-the-art methods.