cs.LGFeb 20, 2026

Deepmechanics

Authors: Abhay Shinde, Aryan Amit Barsainyan, Jose Siguenza, Ankita Vaishnobi Bisoi, Rakshit Kr. Singh, Bharath Ramsundar

Organizations: Deep Forest Sciences, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India · Deep Forest Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India · Deep Forest Sciences, Palo alto, California, USA · Deep Forest Sciences, Dabolim, Goa, India

Abstract

Physics-informed deep learning models have emerged as powerful tools for learning dynamical systems. These models directly encode physical principles into network architectures. However, systematic benchmarking of these approaches across diverse physical phenomena remains limited, particularly in conservative and dissipative systems. In addition, benchmarking that has been done thus far does not integrate out full trajectories to check stability. In this work, we benchmark three prominent physics-informed architectures such as Hamiltonian Neural Networks (HNN), Lagrangian Neural Networks (LNN), and Symplectic Recurrent Neural Networks (SRNN) using the DeepChem framework, an open-source scientific machine learning library. We evaluate these models on six dynamical systems spanning classical conservative mechanics (mass-spring system, simple pendulum, double pendulum, and three-body problem, spring-pendulum) and non-conservative systems with contact (bouncing ball). We evaluate models by computing error on predicted trajectories and evaluate error both quantitatively and qualitatively. We find that all benchmarked models struggle to maintain stability for chaotic or nonconservative systems. Our results suggest that more research is needed for physics-informed deep learning models to learn robust models of classical mechanical systems.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 16, 2026

Prediction Is Not Physics: Learning and Evaluating Conserved Quantities in Neural Simulators

A diffusion model trained on Hamiltonian trajectories can achieve rollout MSE near 10−310^{-3}, but the standard deviation of its energy over time is between 7500 and 36000 times larger than the ground-truth energy standard deviation, indicating a failure to preserve conservation laws. This gap motivates our central question of whether neural networks can learn or select globally conserved quantities from physical trajectories. We investigate this across three Hamiltonian systems: projectile motion, pendulum, and spring-mass. We use a structured T(v)+V(q)T(v)+V(q) energy model, a black-box Conservation Discovery Network (CDN), a polynomial CDN, and a conditional diffusion baseline. The structured network reaches R2≥0.9999R^2 \geq 0.9999 against analytical energy on clean data, while the black-box CDN reaches R2≥0.996R^2 \geq 0.996 when trained with temporal consistency plus a small alignment loss to analytical energy at t=0t=0 (λalign=0.2λ_{\mathrm{align}}=0.2). With λalign=0λ_{\mathrm{align}}=0, CDN Pearson R2R^2 collapses on pendulum and spring-mass (<10−3< 10^{-3}), showing that temporal consistency alone is not enough to reliably identify the true energy. Under 1%1\% additive Gaussian noise, the CDN outperforms the structured model on the projectile and spring-mass systems, suggesting that the CDN may be more robust to noisy inputs in this setting. However, the polynomial CDN is sensitive to training configuration: it achieves R2=0.78R^2=0.78 under a short training schedule on the pendulum system, but reaches R2=0.9998R^2=0.9998 with more training time and data, regardless of whether noise is added.
May 22, 2026

Learning partially observed systems with neural Hamiltonian ordinary differential equations

When learning dynamical systems from data, embedding physical structure can constrain the solution space and improve generalization, but many physics-informed models assume access to the full system state. This limits their use in partially observed settings, where some state variables are completely unobserved and must be inferred without direct supervision. Here, we present neural Hamiltonian ordinary differential equations (NHODE), a framework that combines Hamiltonian neural networks (HNNs) with neural ordinary differential equations (neural ODEs) to learn partially observed dynamical systems from data. The Hamiltonian structure enforces energy conservation by construction, while the neural ODE framework enables a flexible training procedure that allows the loss to be defined only on observed variables. We also incorporate additional physical constraints through symmetry-aware coordinate transformations and separable energy formulations. The framework is evaluated on systems of increasing complexity, from linear and nonlinear mass-spring systems to the chaotic three-body problem. Across all examples, increasing the amount of embedded physical structure improves the accuracy and long-horizon stability of the predictions. Even in the most challenging regimes, the NHODE framework captures both observed and latent dynamics, whereas purely data-driven baselines become unstable.
May 5, 2026

Physics-Modeled Neural Networks

We introduce Dynamical Physics-Modeled Neural Networks (DynPMNNs), a continuous-time deep learning architecture in which each hidden layer is defined as the solution of an ordinary differential equation. Unlike classical feed-forward networks, this approach replaces static activation functions with time-evolving dynamical systems, providing a biologically inspired interpretation of hidden-layer behavior and enabling the integration of physically meaningful models. The framework is rigorously grounded in Reproducing Kernel Banach Spaces (RKBSs), allowing DynPMNNs to be characterized as finite-dimensional solutions of an abstract training problem and revealing structural connections with standard neural networks. We present a concrete implementation based on the FitzHugh--Nagumo model for neuronal activation, where numerical ODE solvers are embedded into the computational graph via Euler-type schemes. Both network weights and dynamical parameters are trained jointly. Through experiments on the California Housing dataset, we compare DynPMNNs with Neural ODEs (NODEs) and Closed-form Continuous-Time Networks (CfCs). Despite using fewer trainable parameters, DynPMNNs achieve competitive performance. These results position DynPMNNs as a principled bridge between dynamical systems and deep learning, with promising directions for further research in expressivity, stability, and physics-based modeling.