Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with inherent knowledge boundaries and hallucinations, limiting their reliability in knowledge-intensive tasks. While Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates these issues, it frequently overlooks structural interdependencies essential for multi-hop reasoning. Graph-based RAG approaches attempt to bridge this gap, yet they typically face trade-offs between accuracy and efficiency due to challenges such as costly graph traversals and semantic noise in LLM-generated summaries. In this paper, we propose HyperNode Expansion and Logical Path-Guided Evidence Localization strategies for GraphRAG (HELP), a novel framework designed to balance accuracy with practical efficiency through two core strategies: 1) HyperNode Expansion, which iteratively chains knowledge triplets into coherent reasoning paths abstracted as HyperNodes to capture complex structural dependencies and ensure retrieval accuracy; and 2) Logical Path-Guided Evidence Localization, which leverages precomputed graph-text correlations to map these paths directly to the corpus for superior efficiency. HELP avoids expensive random walks and semantic distortion, preserving knowledge integrity while drastically reducing retrieval latency. Extensive experiments demonstrate that HELP achieves competitive performance across multiple simple and multi-hop QA benchmarks and up to a 28.8× speedup over leading Graph-based RAG baselines.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the HELP framework. The workflow consists of three stages: (I) Knowledge Graph Construction, utilizing OpenIE to build the Triple-to-Passage Index; (II) Iterative HyperNode Expansion, which iteratively chains triples as HyperNodes while pruning irrelevant ones to maintain reasoning coherence; and (III) Logical Path-Guided Evidence Localization, where HyperNodes are grounded back to the original passages for precise evidence retrieval via a hybrid mechanism.
Simple QA
Multi-Hop QA
Retrieval
NQ
PopQA
MuSiQue
2Wiki
HotpotQA
LV-Eval
Avg
Simple Baselines
None
54.9
32.5
26.1
42.8
47.3
6.0
34.9
Contriever ( Izacard et al., 2021 )
58.9
53.1
31.3
41.9
62.3
8.1
42.6
BM25 ( Robertson and Walker, 1994 )
59.0
49.9
28.8
51.2
63.4
5.9
43.0
GTR ( Ni et al., 2022 )
59.9
56.2
34.6
52.8
62.8
7.1
45.6
Table 1: Performance (F1 scores) comparison of various retrieval methods across different tasks, with all models evaluated using Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct as the backbone. Results are directly reported from HippoRAG2 ( Gutiérrez et al., 2025 ) by default, while methods marked with ( ∗ ) denote our local reproduction. The best results are in bold , and the second best are underlined . The † symbol indicates a failure in graph construction due to large corpus size.
Figure 2: Retrieval efficiency on PopQA (Simple QA) and 2Wiki (Multi-Hop QA). Absolute retrieval time (in seconds) for processing 1,000 queries are annotated above the bars, highlighting that HELP reduces the total retrieval latency to under 90 seconds.
Quota(M)
EM(%)
F1(%)
Recall@5(%)
0
57.5
61.55
76.25
1
57.7
62.19
76.52
2
63.0
69.52
84.95
3
64.3
71.01
89.00
4
66.6
73.90
92.15
5
65.9
73.09
91.65
Table 2: Ablation study of the Hybrid Retrieval Strategy on the 2Wiki dataset. M denotes the primary quota of passages assigned to the logical path-guided retrieval, while the total context size is fixed at 5. M=0 corresponds to a purely dense retrieval baseline.
Figure 3: Experimental analysis of expansion hops N on HotpotQA dataset. The bars indicate retrieval time (left axis), while the line tracks the QA F1 score (right axis).
Figure 4: Hyperparameter sensitivity analysis of the Initial Triple Size ( n ) and Hypernode Beam Size ( k ) on MuSiQue dataset. The heatmap reports the F1 scores (%), demonstrating the impact of varying the seed set size and pruning threshold.
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Symbol
Description
Value
N
Number of expansion hops
2
n
Initial seed triple size
3
k
Hypernode beam search size
50
M
Quota for logical path-guided passages
4
L
Total context size ( M + Dense passages)
5
Appendix
Table 3: Hyperparameter settings for the HELP framework.
Simple QA
Multi-Hop QA
Retrieval
NQ
PopQA
MuSiQue
2Wiki
HotpotQA
LV-Eval
Avg
Graph-based RAG Methods
HippoRAG2 ( Gutiérrez et al., 2025 )
40.4 / 54.4
42.2 / 56.1
34.3 / 45.8
60.2 / 69.4
58.4 / 72.9
7.26 / 9.67
40.5 / 51.4
LinearRAG ( Zhuang et al., 2025 )
31.6 / 43.8
6.6 / 21.9
18.7 / 28.1
42.4 / 53.2
39.6 / 52.4
6.5/ 10.7
24.2 / 35.0
HyperGraphRAG ( Luo et al., 2025 )
30.3 / 42.1
7.9 / 22.5
22.7 / 36.9
45.5 / 58.6
54.3 / 70.2
N/A †
-
HELP (Ours)
43.0 / 56.9
44.5 / 57.4
33.7 / 44.7
62.0 / 69.5
60.4 / 73.9
10.5 / 12.9
42.4 / 52.6
Appendix
Table 4: Performance comparison (EM / F1 scores) of various retrieval methods across different tasks, with all models evaluated using Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 as the backbone. In each cell, the first value represents the Exact Match (EM) score, and the second represents the F1 score. The best results are in bold . The † symbol indicates a failure in graph construction due to large corpus size.
Question
Who is the husband of Princess Elene Of Georgia?
Ground Truth
Prince Archil of Imereti
Reasoning Chain
Princess Elene of Georgiamother ofSolomon II of Imeretihad fatherPrince Archil of Imereti
LinearRAG
Retrieved Passages: 1) ✗ Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia: …husband was Prince Nicholas… 2) ✗ Prince Adarnase of Kartli: …natural son of Levan of Kartli by a concubine… 3) ✗ Princess Charlotte of Württemberg: …the wife of Grand Duke Michael Pavlovich of Russia… 4) ✗ Clous van Mechelen: …is a Dutch musician, arranger, and actor… 5) ✗ Bernhard III, Prince of Anhalt-Bernburg: …was the eldest son of bernhard ii… Prediction: ✗ There is no direct information provided about the husband of Princess Elene of Georgia in the given passages.
HyperGraphRAG
Retrieved Passages: 1) ✗ Gundobad: …He was the husband of Caretene. 2) ✗ Eunoë (wife of Bogudes): Eunoë was the wife of Bogudes, King of Mauretania. 3) ✗ Engelbert III of the Mark: …Adolph was the eldest son of Count Adolph II… 4) ✗ Megingoz of Guelders: …He married Gerberga of Lorraine… 5) ✗ Princess Rodam of Kartli: …Princess Rodam married King George VII… Prediction: ✗ King George VII of Imereti
HippoRAG2
Retrieved Passages: 1) ✓ Princess Elene of Georgia: …She was the mother of Solomon II of Imereti… 2) ✗ Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia: …husband was Prince Nicholas… 3) ✗ Princess Rodam of Kartli: …Princess Rodam married King George VII… 4) ✓ Solomon II of Imereti: …He was born as David to Prince Archil of Imereti… 5) ✗ Grand Duchess Elena Pavlovna of Russia: …his second wife Sophie Dorothea of Württemberg… Prediction: ✗ None mentioned.
HELP
Expansion from Initial Triples as Seed HyperNodes ("princess elene of georgia", "daughter of", "heraclius ii") ("princess elene of georgia", "mother of", "solomon ii of imereti") ("princess elene of georgia", "born in", "georgia") Retrieved Passages: 1) ✓ Princess Elene of Georgia: …She was the mother of Solomon II of Imereti… 2) ✓ Solomon II of Imereti: …He was born as David to Prince Archil of Imereti… 3) ✗ Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia: …husband was Prince Nicholas… 4) ✗ Princess Rodam of Kartli: …Princess Rodam married King George VII… 5) ✗ Grand Duchess Elena Pavlovna of Russia: …his second wife Sophie Dorothea of Württemberg… Prediction: ✓ Prince Archil of Imereti
Appendix
Table 5: A case study illustrating how different methods handle a 2-hop query requiring cross-passage inference. HELP successfully leverages seed HyperNodes to anchor the correct reasoning path, whereas other baselines suffer from semantic drift or hallucination.
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by grounding the generation process on external knowledge. However, standard RAG approaches struggle with multi-hop reasoning. While recent graph-based RAG methods improve the retrieval of interconnected chunks, they often rely on computationally expensive and error-prone LLM-based extraction pipelines. To address these issues, we propose TIGRAG (Token-Induced GraphRAG), an efficient graph-augmented RAG framework based on a token co-occurrence Knowledge Graph. TIGRAG directly models topological relationships between tokens using sliding-window co-occurrence statistics, thus enabling scalable graph construction. During inference, it combines graph-based semantic expansion and neural reranking to retrieve interconnected evidence for multi-hop reasoning. Specifically, it introduces an iterative entity-driven retrieval strategy that progressively expands the query using bridging entities extracted from previously retrieved contexts. We evaluated TIGRAG on three widely adopted multi-hop Question Answering (QA) benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrated that our framework consistently outperforms dense retrieval and graph-based RAG methods in both retrieval and downstream QA tasks, while substantially reducing indexing time, inference latency, and prompt footprint.
Gianluca Bonifazi, Christopher Buratti, Michele Marchetti +5
aUniversità Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy · bUniversità di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a core paradigm for enhancing factual grounding and multi-hop reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs). Traditional text-based RAG often retrieves logically irrelevant pseudo-evidence, while graph-based RAG is frequently hindered by search-time pruning, which may discard potentially valid reasoning paths. Existing hybrid approaches primarily adopt simple evidence concatenation or unidirectional enhancement, which fails to address the fundamental "Information Island" problem caused by asymmetric reasoning flows between unstructured text and structured graphs. We propose TGS-RAG, a unified framework for Text-Graph Synergistic enhancement. TGS-RAG introduces a bidirectional mechanism: (i) a Graph-to-Text channel that employs a Global Voting strategy from visited graph nodes to re-rank and refine textual evidence, filtering out semantic noise; and (ii) a Text-to-Graph channel that utilizes the Memory-based Orphan Entity Bridging algorithm. This algorithm utilizes textual cues to proactively resurrect valid but previously pruned reasoning paths from the search history without additional database overhead. Experimental results on multiple multi-hop reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that TGS-RAG significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a superior balance between retrieval precision and computational efficiency.
Jiarui Zhong, Hong Cai Chen
School of Automation, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) has remarkably enhanced large language models on complex reasoning by leveraging structured entity topologies. However, existing frameworks heavily rely on standard autoregressive language models where the nature of inherent sequential generation severely hinders overall inference efficiency. Inspired by Diffusion Language Models (DLMs) that offer massive parallelism via continuous refine-in-parallel decoding, we aim to accelerate GraphRAG in the discrete space. However, it remains non-trivial for two challenges. First, partially denoised drafts are highly dynamic and uncertain, making dynamic graph grounding non-trivial. Second, raw denoising states are inherently noisy and unstable, making synchronous graph retrieval and multi-hop aggregation computationally prohibitive. To this end, we present LADDER, a novel framework that bridges diffusion language modeling with GraphRAG through graph-guided parallel decoding. Specifically, (i) we propose an event-driven self-clocking retrieval, inspired by our key insight that 88% of target entities emerge early in the partially denoised state, leading final commitment by an average of 5.7-9.6 steps. This mechanism dynamically triggers graph retrieval only when the set of graph-linkable entities expands, yielding an asynchronous self-clocking policy that bypasses learned gates or heuristic thresholds. (ii) An incomplete-query graph propagation module is designed to process the newly emerging entity queries using a specialized graph foundation model, continuously aggregating multi-hop evidence to sharpen parallel predictions and accelerate overall decoding convergence. Extensive experiments on three challenging multi-hop QA benchmarks show that LADDER raises average exact match from 39.6% to 45.2% while achieving a 4.1x latency reduction.
Senlei Zhang, Linhao Luo, Qian-Wen Zhang +4
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Monash University · Tencent Youtu Lab