math.OCFeb 24, 2026

Complexity of Classical Acceleration for ℓ1\ell_1-Regularized PageRank

Authors: Kimon Fountoulakis, David Martínez-Rubio

Organizations: University of Waterloo, Canada · IMDEA Software Institute, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

We study the degree-weighted work required to compute ℓ1\ell_1-regularized PageRank using the standard accelerated proximal-gradient method (FISTA). For non-accelerated methods (ISTA), the best known worst-case work is O~((αρ)−1)\widetilde{O}((αρ)^{-1}), where αα is the teleportation parameter and ρρ is the ℓ1\ell_1-regularization parameter. It is not known whether classical acceleration methods can improve 1/α1/α to 1/α1/\sqrtα while preserving the 1/ρ1/ρ locality scaling, or whether they can be asymptotically worse. For FISTA, we show a negative result by constructing a family of instances for which standard FISTA is asymptotically worse than ISTA. On the positive side, we analyze FISTA on a slightly over-regularized objective and show that, under a confinement condition, all spurious activations remain inside a boundary set B\mathcal{B}. This yields a bound consisting of an accelerated (ρα)−1log⁡(α/ε)(ρ\sqrtα)^{-1}\log(α/\varepsilon) term plus a boundary overhead vol(B)/(ρα3/2)\sqrt{vol(\mathcal{B})}/(ρα^{3/2}). We also provide graph-structural sufficient conditions that imply such confinement.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Aug 11, 2026

A lower bound for stepsize-based acceleration of gradient descent

Recent work has shown that, for smooth convex optimization, plain gradient descent can be accelerated from its textbook convergence rate of O(T−1)O(T^{-1}) (where TT denotes the number of iterations) to O(T−log⁡2(1+2))O\big(T^{-\log_2(1+\sqrt{2})}\big) using carefully designed stepsize schedules alone, without resorting to momentum or other algorithmic modifications. Despite this progress, however, little was known about lower bounds for such methods beyond the classical Ω(T−2)Ω(T^{-2}) benchmark for general first-order methods. In this work, we present a new lower bound of Ω(T−1.9319)Ω(T^{-1.9319}) for the last-iterate convergence rate of gradient descent with predetermined nonnegative stepsize schedules. This result provides rigorous evidence that stepsize schedules alone cannot accelerate plain GD to the optimal O(T−2)O(T^{-2}) convergence rate. The proof was developed by GPT-5.6 Sol Pro under the authors' guidance.
Aug 12, 2026

Tight Nonasymptotic Local Convergence of Sinkhorn-Knopp

We revisit the Sinkhorn-Knopp (SK) algorithm for the matrix scaling problem. Despite extensive literature on the global convergence of SK and its variants, its local linear convergence behavior remains less understood. We address this gap by providing the first nonasymptotic local analysis of SK that matches the rate obtained from existing asymptotic Jacobian-based arguments. We show that under certain connectivity conditions, SK is a polynomial-time algorithm for doubly stochastic matrix scaling. With the developed tools, we showcase the local suboptimality of SK and provide accelerated variants. Finally, for dense matrices, we improve the complexity of existing first-order matrix scaling algorithms from O(n7/3ε2/3)O(\tfrac{n^{7/3}}{\varepsilon^{2/3}}) to O(n9/4ε)O(\tfrac{n^{9/4}}{\sqrt{\varepsilon}}).
Nov 4, 2025

Accelerated Frank-Wolfe Algorithms: Complementarity Conditions and Sparsity

We develop new accelerated first-order algorithms in the Frank-Wolfe (FW) family for minimizing smooth convex functions over compact convex sets, with a focus on two prominent constraint classes: (1) polytopes and (2) matrix domains given by the spectrahedron and nuclear-norm balls. A key technical ingredient is a complementarity condition that captures solution sparsity---face dimension for polytopes and rank for matrices. We present two algorithms: (1) a purely linear optimization oracle (LOO) method for polytopes that has optimal worst-case first-order (FO) oracle complexity and, aside of a finite burn-in phase and up to a logarithmic factor, has LOO complexity that scales with r/εr/\sqrtε, where εε is the target accuracy and rr is the solution sparsity (independently of the ambient dimension), and (2) a hybrid scheme that combines FW with a sparse projection oracle (e.g., low-rank SVDs for matrix domains with low-rank solutions), which also has optimal FO oracle complexity, and after a finite burn-in phase, only requires O(1/ε)O(1/\sqrtε) sparse projections and LOO calls (independently of both the ambient dimension and the sparsity level of optimal solutions). Our results close a gap on how to accelerate recent advancements in linearly-converging FW algorithms for strongly convex optimization, without paying the price of the dimension.