cs.CRFeb 25, 2026

Poisoned Acoustics

Authors: Harrison Dahme

Organizations: CTO and Partner, Hack VC

Abstract

Training-data poisoning attacks can induce targeted, undetectable failure in deep neural networks by corrupting a vanishingly small fraction of training labels. We demonstrate this on acoustic vehicle classification using the MELAUDIS urban intersection dataset (approx. 9,600 audio clips, 6 classes): a compact 2-D convolutional neural network (CNN) trained on log-mel spectrograms achieves 95.7% Attack Success Rate (ASR) -- the fraction of target-class test samples misclassified under the attack -- on a Truck-to-Car label-flipping attack at just p=0.5% corruption (48 records), with zero detectable change in aggregate accuracy (87.6% baseline; 95% CI: 88-100%, n=3 seeds). We prove this stealth is structural: the maximum accuracy drop from a complete targeted attack is bounded above by the minority class fraction (beta). For real-world class imbalances (Truck approx. 3%), this bound falls below training-run noise, making aggregate accuracy monitoring provably insufficient regardless of architecture or attack method. A companion backdoor trigger attack reveals a novel trigger-dominance collapse: when the target class is a dataset minority, the spectrogram patch trigger becomes functionally redundant--clean ASR equals triggered ASR, and the attack degenerates to pure label flipping. We formalize the ML training pipeline as an attack surface and propose a trust-minimized defense combining content-addressed artifact hashing, Merkle-tree dataset commitment, and post-quantum digital signatures (ML-DSA-65/CRYSTALS-Dilithium3, NIST FIPS 204) for cryptographically verifiable data provenance.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 10, 2026

Empirical Evaluation of Data Poisoning Attacks in Supervised Learning

Data poisoning corrupts training data to degrade a model or to plant attacker-controlled behavior. This study evaluates two representative training-time attacks, label flipping and backdoor poisoning, on MNIST and Fashion-MNIST with three baseline classifiers: Logistic Regression, Linear SVM, and Random Forest. Clean training is compared with poisoning rates of 5%, 10%, and 20% using clean-test accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, and, for backdoors, attack success rate. Label flipping caused clear degradation, largest for Logistic Regression and Linear SVM, while Random Forest stayed comparatively stable. Backdoor poisoning reached attack success rates from 0.9667 to 1.0000 on both datasets and all three models while often keeping clean-test performance near baseline. The results separate indiscriminate poisoning, which shows up in standard metrics, from targeted backdoor poisoning, which stays comparatively stealthy while embedding highly effective malicious behavior, and they support security-oriented evaluation beyond conventional clean-test metrics.
Apr 23, 2026

CSC: Turning the Adversary's Poison against Itself

Poisoning-based backdoor attacks pose significant threats to deep neural networks by embedding triggers in training data, causing models to misclassify triggered inputs as adversary-specified labels while maintaining performance on clean data. Existing poison restraint-based defenses often suffer from inadequate detection against specific attack variants and compromise model utility through unlearning methods that lead to accuracy degradation. This paper conducts a comprehensive analysis of backdoor attack dynamics during model training, revealing that poisoned samples form isolated clusters in latent space early on, with triggers acting as dominant features distinct from benign ones. Leveraging these insights, we propose Cluster Segregation Concealment (CSC), a novel poison suppression defense. CSC first trains a deep neural network via standard supervised learning while segregating poisoned samples through feature extraction from early epochs, DBSCAN clustering, and identification of anomalous clusters based on class diversity and density metrics. In the concealment stage, identified poisoned samples are relabeled to a virtual class, and the model's classifier is fine-tuned using cross-entropy loss to replace the backdoor association with a benign virtual linkage, preserving overall accuracy. CSC was evaluated on four benchmark datasets against twelve poisoning-based attacks, CSC outperforms nine state-of-the-art defenses by reducing average attack success rates to near zero with minimal clean accuracy loss. Contributions include robust backdoor patterns identification, an effective concealment mechanism, and superior empirical validation, advancing trustworthy artificial intelligence.
Jun 27, 2026

A Novel Latent-Class Attack and its Detection by Class Subspace Orthogonalization

Deep learning, which in general relies on voluminous amounts of training data, is vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, including error-generic attacks and backdoors (Trojans). In this work, we propose a new data poisoning attack we dub a latent class attack. Here, all poisoned examples are from a class that is novel (unknown) for the given classification domain and are mislabeled to one of the known classes (the target class) of the domain, so that the model learns to recognize the novel class as a sub-class of the target class. Such attacks could be used e.g. to defeat AI-based access control systems, or could cause a "foe" to be classified as a "friend". We also propose a post-training defense to detect this attack, without any access to the training set. This detection approach builds on "class subspace orthogonalization" (CSO), a plug-and-play paradigm demonstrated to improve existing backdoor detectors. Here, CSO is used to seek an input (a putative unknown class instance) whose internal representation is not aligned with any of the known classes, and yet which is classified with confidence to one of these classes. Finally, specific to image classification domains, we propose a method for visualizing the estimated unknown class instance, providing explainability to our latent class detections.