Organizations: School of Computer Science, Peking University · School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, Peking University · National Key Laboratory for Multimedia Information Processing, Peking University
Visual Autoregressive(VAR) models enhance generation quality but face a critical efficiency bottleneck in later stages. In this paper, we present a novel optimization framework for VAR models that fundamentally differs from prior approaches such as FastVAR and SkipVAR. Instead of relying on heuristic skipping strategies, our method leverages attention entropy to characterize the semantic projections across different dimensions of the model architecture. This enables precise identification of parameter dynamics under varying token granularity levels, semantic scopes, and generation scales. Building on this analysis, we further uncover sparsity patterns along three critical dimensions-token, layer, and scale-and propose a set of fine-grained optimization strategies tailored to these patterns. Extensive evaluation demonstrates that our approach achieves aggressive acceleration of the generation process while significantly preserving semantic fidelity and fine details, outperforming traditional methods in both efficiency and quality. Experiments on Infinity-2B and Infinity-8B models demonstrate that ToProVAR achieves up to 3.4x acceleration with minimal quality loss, effectively mitigating the issues found in prior work. Our code will be made publicly available.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: A comparison between our method and state-of-the-art compression methods. The SOTA methods often suffer from issues such as semantic loss, structure distortion, and detail collapse.
Figure 2: Different Optimization Dimensions – FastVAR vs. SkipVAR vs. ToProVAR
Figure 3: Tri-dimensional attention entropy analysis in VAR models: (a) Token-Level Semantic Salience : Pruning low-saliency tokens preserves quality, while pruning high-saliency ones causes severe degradation. (b) Layer-level Semantic Representation : Global Layers capture structure and are pruning-sensitive, whereas detail layers refine local semantics and can be pruned. (c) Scale-level Semantic Depth : complex objects require deeper scales for fine details, while simple ones stabilize earlier, enabling adaptive depth pruning.
Figure 4: Tri-Dimensional Entropy-Aware VAR Sparsity Optimization: (a) Scale-level : compute the low-entropy ratio ρs across scales and select the pruning start depth via threshold τ . (b) Layer-level : for each scale, perform SVD on the entropy map to separate Global layers from Detail layers. (c) Token-level : within prunable layers/scales, increase pruning rate with scale and use entropy-based gating pprune to remove low-salience tokens, preserving salient regions.
Methods
GenEval
DPG
Latency(s) ↓
Speedup
Two Obj.
Position
Color Attri.
Overall ↑
Entity
Relation
Attribute
Overall ↑
Infinity-2B
79.01
24.00
58.00
0.69
90.81
88.19
87.89
83.41
2.10
1.0 ×
+FastVAR
78.79
27.75
59.50
0.68
88.86
91.57
87.46
83.39
0.80
2.6 ×
+SkipVAR
76.77
26.50
57.50
0.67
89.30
87.07
87.01
82.94
1.10
2.0 ×
+ToProVAR
78.80
29.50
62.00
0.69
87.39
88.92
90.01
83.07
0.61
3.4 ×
Infinity-8B
96.97
61.00
75.00
0.83
90.92
93.57
88.83
86.68
4.86
1.0 ×
Table 1: Quantitative comparison on GenEval and DPG. Note, GenEval follows the official protocol without rewritten prompts. Latency is measured on a single GPU with batch size 1.
Methods
HPSv2.1
ImageReward ↑
Latency(s) ↓
Speedup
Photo
Concept-Art
Anime
Paintings
Overall ↑
Infinity-2B
29.40
30.38
31.72
30.39
30.47
0.94
1.57
1.0 ×
+FastVAR
28.86
29.90
31.12
29.92
29.95
0.92
0.62
2.5 ×
+SkipVAR
29.25
30.25
31.50
30.45
30.39
0.93
0.87
1.8 ×
+ToProVAR
29.26
30.15
31.44
30.23
30.27
0.93
0.58
2.7 ×
Infinity-8B
29.42
31.27
32.45
30.83
30.99
1.04
5.31
1.0 ×
Table 2: Quantitative comparison on HPSv2.1 and ImageReward, two human preference benchmarks. Latency is measured on a single GPU with batch size 1 .
Method
Landscape
People
Food
Latency
FID ↓
CLIP ↑
Latency
FID ↓
CLIP ↑
Latency
FID ↓
CLIP ↑
Infinity-2B
1.67
44.1
0.267
1.71
58.91
0.281
1.69
84.2
0.270
+FastVAR
0.60
45.1
0.264
0.61
71.8
0.274
0.61
84.7
0.273
+SkipVAR
1.01
58.1
0.260
1.06
73.7
0.253
0.88
102.3
0.256
+ToProVAR
0.50
44.5
0.264
0.48
58.84
0.283
0.46
84.3
0.274
Table 3: Quantitative comparisons of FID and CLIP score with different generation categories on the MJHQ30K dataset. Latency is measured on a single GPU with batch size 1 .
Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of various methods on complex prompts. Our method effectively prevents semantic loss, structure distortion, and detail collapse while maintaining high visual fidelity.
Table 9
Figure 6: Qualitative Visualizations of the three components ablation(Scale, Layer, Token) on Infinity-2B.The full tri-stage framework better preserves global layout and local details than partial variants that prune along only a subset of dimensions.
Figure 11
Appendix figures & tables9 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
model
scales
layers
Infinity-2B
11
32
Infinity-8B
13
40
Appendix
Table 7: The basic information of models.
Method
Model
Method Parameter
FastVAR
Infinity-2B
{10:0.4;11:0.6}
Infinity-8B
{10:0.4;11:0.6;12:1.0;13:1.0}
SkipVAR
Infinity-2B
0.84
Infinity-8B
0.84@2B
Appendix
Table 8: Acceleration Configurations for FastVAR and SkipVAR. NOTE: Notation ’s:p’ means scale index s is pruned with pruning ratio p,All ratios are applied per-layer at inference time.
Method
Two Obj.
Position
Color
Attri.
Overall ↑
Latency (s) ↓
Speedup ↑
HART
0.62
0.13
0.18
0.51
0.51
0.95
1.0 ×
+FastVAR
0.59
0.13
0.19
0.50
0.50
0.64
1.5 ×
+ToProVAR (ours)
0.61
0.13
0.18
0.51
0.51
0.56
1.7 ×
Appendix
Table 9: Comparison of ToProVAR and FastVAR on the GenEval benchmark using HART.
Method
Latency (s) ↓
Speed ↑
GenEval ↑
Infinity-2B
2.10
1.0 ×
0.690
Fix Scale Exit
0.41
5.1 ×
0.403
Scale Depth Loc.
0.47
4.5 ×
0.477
Scale Depth Loc. + Fine-grained Token Prun.
0.78
2.7 ×
0.603
Scale Depth Loc. + Layer Repr. Ident.
0.57
3.7 ×
0.679
ToProVAR (Scale + Layer + Token)
0.61
3.4 ×
0.690
Appendix
Table 10: Extended ablation study of the tri-dimensional progressive framework on Infinity-2B.
Figure 8: Robustness analysis of the scale-depth threshold τ . Left: mean attention entropy vs. scale. Right: low-entropy ratio ρs vs. scale, together with the distribution of ρs for images whose SSIM to the full-scale baseline exceeds 0.8 .
Figure 9: Visualization of token-level pruning in ToProVAR. Gray tokens indicate those pruned by ToProVAR, while colored tokens correspond to preserved, semantically salient regions.
Figure 10: Additional visualizations of layer representations on HART, Infinity-2B, and Infinity-8B.We show example attention maps for the representative Global and Detail layers.
Figure 11: Additional visualizations of failure layer representation case.
Figure 12: Additional visualization results of FastVAR, SkipVAR, and ToProVAR on Infinity-2B and Infinity-8B. Compared to the baselines, ToProVAR more faithfully preserves global structure and fine details under similar or higher acceleration, yielding visually sharper and more semantically consistent generations.
Visual AutoRegressive (VAR) models based on next-scale prediction enable efficient hierarchical generation, yet the inference cost grows quadratically at high resolutions. We observe that the computationally intensive later scales predominantly refine high-frequency textures and exhibit substantial spatial redundancy, in contrast to earlier scales that determine the global structural layout. Existing pruning methods primarily focus on high-frequency detection for token selection, often overlooking structural coherence and consequently degrading global semantics. To address this limitation, we propose StepVAR, a training-free token pruning framework that accelerates VAR inference by jointly considering structural and textural importance. Specifically, we employ a lightweight high-pass filter to capture local texture details, while leveraging Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to preserve global structural information. This dual-criterion design enables the model to retain tokens critical for both fine-grained fidelity and overall composition. To maintain valid next-scale prediction under sparse tokens, we further introduce a nearest neighbor feature propagation strategy to reconstruct dense feature maps from pruned representations. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art text-to-image and text-to-video VAR models demonstrate that StepVAR achieves substantial inference speedups while maintaining generation quality. Quantitative and qualitative evaluations consistently show that our method outperforms existing acceleration approaches, validating its effectiveness and general applicability across diverse VAR architectures.
Visual Autoregressive (VAR) modeling inefficiently applies a fixed computational depth to each position when generating high-resolution images. While existing methods accelerate inference by pruning tokens using frequency maps, their binary hard-pruning approach is fundamentally limited and fails to improve quality even with better frequency estimation. Observing that VAR models possess significant depth redundancy, we propose a paradigm shift from pruning entire tokens to adaptively allocating per-token computational depth. To this end, we introduce DepthVAR, a training-free framework that dynamically allocates computation. It integrates an adaptive depth scheduler, which assigns computational depth via a cyclic rotated schedule for balanced, non-static refinement, with a dynamic inference process that translates these depths into layer-major masks, selectively applies transformer blocks, and blends the resulting codes to ensure each token's influence is proportional to its processing depth. Extensive experiments show that DepthVAR achieves 2.3×-3.1× acceleration with minimal quality loss, offering a competitive compute-performance trade-off compared to existing hard-pruning approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/STOVAGtz/DepthVAR
Chunliang Li, Tianze Cao, Sanyuan Zhao
Beijing Institute of Technology · Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai
Visual Autoregressive (VAR) models deliver high-quality image generation but suffer from significant inference latency at high resolutions. Recent acceleration approaches most rely on heuristic measures with layer features to prune tokens. Such heuristics are sensitive to complex contextual semantics, leading to inaccurate identification of redundant computation and poor adaptability across prompts. We rethink redundancy in VAR from the perspective of its impact on pixel-space generation and introduce Latent Discrepancy. This unified metric quantifies a token's contribution by measuring the change in model states during generation. Our analysis shows that redundancy is more accurately identified when guided by image latent or pixel-space signals. We further observed that in classifier-free guidance (CFG), the convergence trend of the discrepancy between conditional and unconditional branches exhibits high dynamics with different prompts. Based on these findings, we propose LD-Pruning (Latent Discrepancy Pruning), a training-free framework that removes redundancy via latent discrepancy by integrating decoding-free region selection and adaptive unconditional-branch skipping. Extensive experiments show that LD-Pruning substantially reduces inference latency while maintaining high generation quality, achieving up to 2.35x speedup on Infinity-8B.
Changwang Mei, Peisong Wang, Zekun Li +7
Nanjing University of Science and Technology · C2DL, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences · Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence +2