cs.AIFeb 27, 2026

MMKG-RDS: Reasoning Data Synthesis via Deep Mining of Multimodal Knowledge Graphs

Authors: Lun Zhan, Feng Xiong, Huanyong Liu, Feng Zhang, Yuhui Yin

Organizations: AI Research Institute, Qihoo 360

Abstract

Synthesizing high-quality training data is crucial for enhancing domain models' reasoning abilities. Existing methods face limitations in long-tail knowledge coverage, effectiveness verification, and interpretability. Knowledge-graph-based approaches still fall short in functionality, granularity, customizability, and evaluation. To address these issues, we propose MMKG-RDS, a flexible framework for reasoning data synthesis that leverages multimodal knowledge graphs. It supports fine-grained knowledge extraction, customizable path sampling, and multidimensional data quality scoring. We validate MMKG-RDS with the MMKG-RDS-Bench dataset, covering five domains, 17 task types, and 14,950 samples. Experimental results show fine-tuning Qwen3 models (0.6B/8B/32B) on a small number of synthesized samples improves reasoning accuracy by 9.2%. The framework also generates distinct data, challenging existing models on tasks involving tables and formulas, useful for complex benchmark construction. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/360AILAB-NLP/MMKG-RDS

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables9 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

Mar 2, 2026

Learning from Synthetic Data Improves Multi-hop Reasoning

Reinforcement Learning (RL) has been shown to significantly boost reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in math, coding, and multi-hop reasoning tasks. However, RL fine-tuning requires abundant high-quality verifiable data, often sourced from human annotations, generated from frontier LLMs, or scored by LLM-based verifiers. All three have considerable limitations: human-annotated datasets are small and expensive to curate, LLM-generated data is hallucination-prone and costly, and LLM-based verifiers are inaccurate and slow. In this work, we investigate a cheaper alternative: RL fine-tuning on rule-generated synthetic data for multi-hop reasoning tasks. We discover that LLMs fine-tuned on synthetic data perform significantly better on popular real-world question-answering benchmarks, despite the synthetic data containing only fictional knowledge. On stratifying performance by question difficulty, we find that synthetic data teaches LLMs to compose knowledge -- a fundamental and generalizable reasoning skill. Our work highlights rule-generated synthetic reasoning data as a free and scalable resource to improve LLM reasoning capabilities.
Nov 13, 2025

Learning to Pose Problems: Reasoning-Driven and Solver-Adaptive Data Synthesis

Data synthesis for training large reasoning models offers a scalable alternative to limited, human-curated datasets, enabling the creation of high-quality data. However, existing approaches face several challenges: (i) indiscriminate generation that ignores the solver's ability and yields low-value problems, or reliance on complex data pipelines to balance problem difficulty; and (ii) a lack of reasoning in problem generation, leading to shallow problem variants. In this paper, we develop a problem generator that reasons explicitly to plan problem directions before synthesis and adapts difficulty to the solver's ability. We recover problem-design CoT from human-authored multi-part questions, using later subquestions as targets to infer the design rationale. These traces initialize the generator, which is then optimized with a seed-conditioned reward based on solver answer consistency. The reward guides difficulty adjustment relative to each seed while favoring problems near the solver's competence boundary. Across 10 mathematical and general reasoning benchmarks, our method outperforms seed-only training by 2.69 and 3.39 percentage points after one and three rounds, respectively. The framework also extends to vision-language models. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/WalkerWorldPeace/Reasoning-Synthesis.
Mar 1, 2026

CHIMERA: Compact Synthetic Data for Generalizable LLM Reasoning

Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable reasoning capabilities, largely enabled by supervised fine-tuning (SFT)- and reinforcement learning (RL)-based post-training on high-quality reasoning data. However, reproducing and extending these capabilities in open and scalable settings is hindered by three data-centric challenges: (1) the cold-start problem, arising from the lack of seed datasets with detailed, long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectories needed to initialize reasoning policies; (2) limited domain coverage, as most existing open-source reasoning datasets are concentrated in mathematics, with limited coverage of broader scientific disciplines; and (3) the annotation bottleneck, where the difficulty of frontier-level reasoning tasks makes reliable human annotation prohibitively expensive or infeasible. To address these challenges, we introduce CHIMERA, a compact synthetic reasoning dataset of 9K samples designed to support generalizable reasoning across domains. CHIMERA is constructed with three key properties: (1) it provides rich, long CoT reasoning trajectories synthesized by state-of-the-art reasoning models; (2) it has broad and structured coverage, spanning 8 major scientific disciplines and over 1K fine-grained topics organized via a model-generated hierarchical taxonomy; and (3) it employs a fully automated, scalable evaluation pipeline that uses strong reasoning models to cross-validate both problem validity and answer correctness, removing the reliance on human annotations. We use CHIMERA to post-train a 4B Qwen3 model with SFT and RL. Despite the dataset's modest size, the resulting model achieves strong performance on a suite of challenging reasoning benchmarks, including GPQA-Diamond, AIME 24/25/26, HMMT 25 and Humanity's Last Exam, approaching or matching the performance of substantially larger models such as DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen3-235B.