Organizations: MoE Key Lab of BIPC, University of Science and Technology of China · Nanyang Technological University · National University of Singapore · Tianjin University
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in vision-language reasoning tasks, yet ensuring their safety remains a critical challenge. Recent input-side defenses detect unsafe images with CLIP and prepend safety prefixes to prompts, but they still suffer from inaccurate detection in complex scenes and unstable safety signals during decoding. To address these issues, we propose GuardAlign, a training-free defense framework that integrates two strategies. First, OT-enhanced safety detection leverages optimal transport to measure distribution distances between image patches and unsafe semantics, enabling accurate identification of malicious regions without additional computational cost. Second, cross-modal attentive calibration strengthens the influence of safety prefixes by adaptively reallocating attention across layers, ensuring that safety signals remain consistently activated throughout generation. Extensive evaluations on six representative MLLMs demonstrate that GuardAlign reduces unsafe response rates by up to 39% on SPA-VL, while preserving utility, achieving an improvement on VQAv2 from 78.51% to 79.21%.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison between existing strategies ( Ding et al., 2025 ) and ours. (a) Similarity scores overlap between safe and unsafe images, while OT-based transport costs yield clear separation for reliable detection. (b) Prefix attention decays in the existing strategies (orange) but remains stable with ours (blue). (c) Example from SPA-VL ( Zhang et al., 2025a ) showing that existing methods generate harmful content, whereas ours maintains safety. (d) Our method achieves consistent safety gains across diverse benchmarks.
Figure 2: Framework of GuardAlign . OT-Enhanced Safety Detection : image patches and predefined unsafe prompt categories are jointly encoded, and optimal transport is used to identify patches that align with harmful semantics. The most suspicious patches are masked to produce a sanitized image. Cross-Modal Attention Calibration : a lightweight safety prefix is added to the query, and the multimodal model attends over the sanitized visual tokens. This design guides the model toward safe evidence and prevents unsafe generations.
Method
SPA-VL
MM-SafetyBench
FigStep
Adv. Image+Text
Harm ↓
SD+TYPO ↓
Vanilla ↓
Suffix ↓
Unconstrained ↓
LLaVA-1.5-7B
46.04
40.46
58.60
62.00
97.50
+ ECSO
23.40
15.89
37.40
59.00
95.00
+ ETA
16.98
15.83
7.80
22.60
22.50
+ GuardAlign
10.31
9.65
3.40
15.30
15.00
LLaVA-1.5-13B
40.75
41.01
61.60
66.40
100.00
Table 1: USR evaluation results across multiple safety benchmarks.
Model
Method
Fine-tuned
Comprehensive Benchmark (↑)
General VQA ( ↑ )
MME P
MME C
MMB
SQA I
TextVQA
VQAv2
LLaVA-1.5-7B
Vanilla MLLM
1505.88
357.86
64.60
69.51
58.20
78.51
+ Posthoc-LoRA
✓
1420.66
332.50
63.32
67.33
55.99
76.87
+ Mixed-LoRA
✓
1483.00
267.14
68.04
68.42
57.88
79.18
+ ECSO
✗
1495.88
360.00
63.83
69.36
58.15
78.39
+ ETA
✗
1506.13
357.86
64.69
69.51
58.15
78.51
Table 2: General performance of different methods.
Model
OT-enhanced
Cross-modal
SPA-VL
Safety Detection
Attention Calibration
Harm ↓ (USR )
Helpful Score ↑
LLaVA-1.5-7B
✗
✗
46.04
7.64
✗
✓
32.12
8.05
✓
✓
10.31
8.63
Table 3: Ablation study of GuardAlign on the SPA-VL test set using LLaVA-1.5-7B, where we ablate two alignment components: malicious detection via OT and mask-guided alignment .
Figure 3: Comparison of safe and unsafe patch feature distributions using different distance metrics. (a): OT distance effectively separates the two distributions. (b): Cosine distance provides a less distinct separation between safe and unsafe patches.
Figure 4: Analysis of factors affecting safety and utility. (a) Varying τ shows a trade-off: smaller values lower USR with higher helpfulness, while larger ones improve robustness at some cost. (b) More patches reduce USR while keeping helpfulness stable, as finer partitioning exposes hidden malicious semantics. (c) Across CLIP backbones from RN50 to SigLIP, our method lowers harm rates while preserving VQA accuracy, showing robustness to encoder variations.
Model
SPA-VL (Harm)
MM-SafetyBench
Running Time ↓
USR ↓
Running Time ↓
USR ↓
LLaVA-1.5-7B
37 min
46.04
5 h 02 min
40.46
+ ETA
2h 30 min
16.98
13h 40min
15.89
+ GuardAlign
42 min
10.31
5h 28 min
9.65
Table 4: Comparison of inference cost and safety on SPA-VL and MM-SafetyBench.
Appendix figures & tables10 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Method
SPA-VL
MM-SafetyBench
FigStep
Adv. Image+Text
Harm ↓
SD+TYPO ↓
Vanilla ↓
Suffix ↓
Unconstrained ↓
LLaVA-1.5-7B
72.45
84.46
86.40
85.80
85.00
+ ECSO
53.96
72.44
79.29
82.20
67.50
+ ETA
38.87
53.39
32.40
25.00
17.50
+ GuardAlign
32.71
45.52
25.40
20.00
13.00
LLaVA-1.5-13B
66.79
87.98
90.20
87.40
80.00
Appendix
Table 5: ASR performance across multiple safety benchmarks.
Model
Comparison Methods
Win-Tie (%) ↑
LLaVA-1.5-7B
GuardAlign v.s.
Vanilla VLM
93.6
Posthoc-LoRA
53.2
Mixed-LoRA
55.7
ECSO
85.3
ETA
79.8
LLaVA-1.5-13B
GuardAlign v.s.
Vanilla VLM
90.2
Appendix
Table 6: Helpfulness evaluation on the SPA-VL Help.
Figure 5: Examples of mask-guided alignment. Unsafe regions in the original image are automatically detected and masked.
Methods
Patch-level PGD
Auto-PGD
ϵ=16/255
ϵ=32/255
ϵ=16/255
ϵ=32/255
LLaVA-v1.5-7B
69.09
74.55
80.60
90.30
+ ETA
5.78
5.93
4.27
4.48
+ GuardAlign
2.15
2.36
3.23
3.65
Appendix
Table 7: Results on MM-SafetyBench with adaptive adversaries.
Harm(USR) ↓
Helpful Score ↑
γ=1.05
10.63
8.26
γ=1.10
10.42
8.47
γ=1.15
10.33
8.56
γ=1.20
10.31
8.63
γ=1.25
10.35
8.58
Appendix
Table 8: Effect of γ on safety and helpfulness.
Model
SPA-VL( ↓ )
TextVQA( ↑ )
LLaVA-1.5-7B
46.04
58.20
LLaVA-1.5-7B (Posthoc-SFT)
12.96
57.80
+ GuardAlign
9.37
58.00
Appendix
Table 9: Comparison of safety and utility with post-hoc SFT and GuardAlign.
MM-SafetyBench
SD+TYPO
TYPO
SD+TYPO
InternVL2.5-38B
7.10
8.09
6.78
+ GuardAlign
7.45
8.51
7.23
InternVL2.5-78B
7.43
7.22
6.60
+ GuardAlign
8.25
8.16
7.58
Appendix
Table 10: Results on MM-SafetyBench for larger LVLMs (InternVL2.5-38B and 78B).
Model
SPA-VL
MM-SafetyBench
Gemini-2.5-Flash
7.36
7.15
+ GuardAlign (OT-ENHANCED DETECTION)
7.41
7.28
GPT-4V
7.02
6.97
+ GuardAlign (OT-ENHANCED DETECTION)
7.23
7.06
Appendix
Table 11: Safety evaluation on the black-box model.
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) face safety misalignment, where visual inputs enable harmful outputs. To address this, existing methods require explicit safety labels or contrastive data; yet, threat-related concepts are concrete and visually depictable, while safety concepts, like helpfulness, are abstract and lack visual referents. Inspired by the Self-Fulfilling mechanism underlying emergent misalignment, we propose Visual Self-Fulfilling Alignment (VSFA). VSFA fine-tunes vision-language models (VLMs) on neutral VQA tasks constructed around threat-related images, without any safety labels. Through repeated exposure to threat-related visual content, models internalize the implicit semantics of vigilance and caution, shaping safety-oriented personas. Experiments across multiple VLMs and safety benchmarks demonstrate that VSFA reduces the attack success rate, improves response quality, and mitigates over-refusal while preserving general capabilities. Our work extends the self-fulfilling mechanism from text to visual modalities, offering a label-free approach to VLMs alignment.
Qishun Yang, Shu Yang, Lijie Hu +1
King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · Provable Responsible AI and Data Analytics Lab · China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay +1
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) face significant safety vulnerabilities from malicious prompt attacks due to weakened alignment during visual integration. Existing defenses suffer from efficiency and robustness. To address these challenges, we first propose the Multimodal Aggregated Feature Extraction (MAFE) framework that enables CLIP to handle long text and fuse multimodal information into unified representations. Through empirical analysis of MAFE-extracted features, we discover distinct distributional patterns between benign and malicious prompts. Building upon this finding, we develop VLMShield, a lightweight safety detector that efficiently identifies multimodal malicious attacks as a plug-and-play solution. Extensive experiments demonstrate superior performance across multiple dimensions, including robustness, efficiency, and utility. Through our work, we hope to pave the way for more secure multimodal AI deployment. Code is available at this https URL.
Peigui Qi, Kunsheng Tang, Yanpu Yu +7
University of Science and Technology of China · Ant Group · University of Washington
Existing safety alignment methods for vision-language models usually modify the model behavior globally: once the safety parameters are trained or loaded, they participate in both unsafe and already-safe generations. This always-on intervention can unnecessarily perturb the model's original reasoning path and degrade general multimodal capabilities. We argue that safety alignment should be an on-demand intervention rather than a permanent modification to every decoding trajectory. To this end, we propose a streaming recognition and gated LoRA framework for intrinsic VLM safety. During autoregressive generation, a lightweight recognizer estimates whether the current pre-token generation state is safe or unsafe. Its output updates the LoRA gate for the following decoding step; otherwise, generation follows the frozen-backbone policy. The LoRA module is trained from unsafe prefixes, transition statements, and safe continuations, so that it learns to redirect unsafe generations back to safe responses after activation. Experiments across multiple safety and general-purpose benchmarks demonstrate the effectiveness of our method in post-alignment settings.
Caoyuan Ma, Tian Gu, Wenpu Liu +11
The University of Tokyo · Wuhan University · Shanghai AI Laboratory +4