ConFoThinking: Consolidated Focused Attention Driven Thinking for Visual Question Answering
Authors: Zhaodong Wu, Haochen Xue, Qi Cao, Wenqi Mo, Yu Pei, Wenqi Xu, Jionglong Su, Yang Liu
Organizations: Wangxuan Institute of Computer Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China · School of AI and Advanced Computing, Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou, China
Thinking with Images improves fine-grained VQA for MLLMs by emphasizing visual cues. However, tool-augmented methods depend on the capacity of grounding, which remains unreliable for MLLMs. In parallel, attention-driven methods to crop the Region of Interest (ROIs) are proposed but they are constrained by (1) fragmented attention signals scattered across layers, leading to suboptimal localization and (2) relying on question- or redundant-text-conditioned attention extraction. Our analysis reveals three patterns: MLLMs may attend to the correct region yet generate incorrect coordinates, where-to-look attention is often fragmented across layers, and attention extraction is query-sensitive. Motivated by these, We propose ConFoThinking, a Consolidated-Focused-Attention-Driven Thinking framework that learns to aggregate attention into a designated intermediate layer, from which we mine and zoom in salient regions for downstream visual understanding. Moreover, we extract attention using concise semantic cues of what to look into, which mitigates the semantic noise introduced by question- or redundant-text-based attention extraction. Experiments across five VQA benchmarks demonstrate ConFoThinking significantly improves perception performance. The code, checkpoints, and dataset will be released after being accepted.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Limitations of existing methods. (A) In tool-augmented coordinate-output pipelines, MLLMs may “say” incorrect bounding-box coordinates, even though their intermediate vision-language fusion layers still attend to the GT ROI. The line chart shows the attention distribution inside the predicted and GT boxes for Qwen3-VL-8B (with tools) on V* benchmark ( Wu and Xie, 2024 ) , where the model outputs an incorrect answer and the predicted box has IoU < 0.1 with the ground-truth box. (B) In attention-driven methods, where-to-look signals are fragmented across layers, making any fixed-layer choice unreliable. The bar chart shows the distribution of the highest-ROI-attention layer for Qwen3-VL-8B across samples in VisCoT (only 19.3% at a fixed single layer (layer22)). (C) Where-to-look signals are query-sensitive: extracting attention from semantic visual cues is more accurate than extracting it from the raw question. The line chart compares the layer-wise attention distributions of these two approaches on the V* benchmark.
Figure 2: ConFoThinking overview. (A) Training ConFoAttn to produce a <FOCUS> … </FOCUS> span and fixed-layer attention heatmaps. (B) Training AttnDetector to regress ROI boxes from attention heatmaps. (C) Inference pipeline: generate heatmap, localize and zoom the ROI, then answer with the base MLLM using both the original and zoomed images.
Model
High-resolution
OCR
General
V* Bench
HRBench-4K
HRBench-8K
InfoVQAVal
GQA
Attr.
Spatial
Overall
FSP
FCP
Overall
FSP
FCP
Overall
Open-source Models
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
78.2
73.6
76.4
85.3
52.3
68.8
78.8
51.8
65.3
77.9
62.1
Qwen3-VL-4B
80.0
75.0
78.0
86.0
62.5
74.3
82.3
58.0
70.1
79.3
69.3
Qwen3-VL-8B
86.1
81.6
84.3
88.3
64.5
76.4
86.3
58.0
72.1
81.7
71.3
Table 1: Results on high-resolution, OCR, and general VQA benchmarks. For Ours , the ↑ value denotes the absolute gain over the corresponding base backbone (e.g., ConFoThinking (Qwen2.5-VL-7B) vs. Qwen2.5-VL-7B).
Method
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
Qwen3-VL-8B
w/o NTP & AC
76.4
84.3
NTP only
81.2
88.0
NTP + AC
86.9
92.1
Table 2: Ablation I: effect of attention-condensation training.
Text Query
Qwen2.5-VL-7B
Qwen3-VL-8B
Question-only
85.9
89.0
All generated text
80.1
84.3
<FOCUS> span
86.9
92.1
Table 3: Ablation II: text query for attention extraction.
Extraction layers
Train
V*
Single layer
{22}
92.1
3-layer window
{21,22,23}
91.1
5-layer window
{20,21,22,23,24}
90.6
Table 4: Ablation III on V* (Qwen3-VL-8B): single-layer extraction vs. neighborhood layer aggregation (the same layer set is used for training and inference).
Figure 3: Comparison for attention condensation.
Appendix figures & tables2 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 4: Layer-wise comparison of attention concentration on RGT vs. Rpred for Pixel-Reasoner over grounding-error cases ( IoU<0.1 ).
Figure 5: Distribution of the peak-attention layer ℓ⋆ on the Validation set, VisCoT. Left: Qwen3-VL-4B (mode at Layer 22). Right: Qwen2.5-VL-7B (mode at Layer 20). Despite the existence of a modal layer, the distribution remains broadly dispersed across layers.
Vision-centric retrieval for VQA requires retrieving images to supply missing visual cues and integrating them into the reasoning process. However, selecting the right images and integrating them effectively into the model's reasoning remains challenging. To address this challenge, we propose R3G, a modular Reasoning-Retrieval-Reranking framework. It first produces a brief reasoning plan that specifies the required visual cues, then adopts a two-stage strategy, with coarse retrieval followed by fine-grained reranking, to select evidence images. On MRAG-Bench, R3G improves accuracy across six MLLM backbones and nine sub-scenarios, achieving state-of-the-art overall performance. Ablations show that sufficiency-aware reranking and reasoning steps are complementary, helping the model both choose the right images and use them well. We release code and data at https://github.com/czh24/R3G.
Zhuohong Chen, Zhengxian Wu, Zirui Liao +6
1The Shenzhen International Graduate School, Tsinghua University, China · School of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, China · 2State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Technology and Equipment, China
Knowledge-based Visual Question Answering (KB-VQA) requires Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to identify and combine fine-grained visual cues with retrieved textual evidence. However, retrieval often introduces noisy and partially relevant content, while images contain distracting visual regions, causing pretrained MLLMs to overlook the evidence that actually supports the answer. To address this, we introduce Look Twice (LoT), a training-free inference-time framework that turns the model's own internal attention into an explicit multimodal evidence-selection mechanism. LoT first leverages the model's internal attention patterns to identify query-relevant image regions and textual sentences, filters attention sinks and distracting content, and reformulates the input to explicitly highlight the selected evidence before answer generation. The method requires no parameter updates, auxiliary models, or architectural modifications. Across four KB-VQA benchmarks and ten off-the-shelf MLLMs ranging from 2B to 38B parameters, LoT improves every evaluated backbone, with average gains of up to +12.5 accuracy points. It also provides further gains when combined with established context-refinement strategies, yielding additional improvements over already refined inputs. These results establish LoT as a general and effective mechanism for enabling pretrained MLLMs to exploit available multimodal evidence more accurately. Source code is publicly available at https://aimagelab.github.io/LoT/.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in Visual Question Answering (VQA), yet they continue to struggle with questions requiring precise spatial reasoning and fine-grained visual understanding. These limitations often manifest as object, attribute, and spatial hallucinations, where models generate confident but visually unsupported responses due to insufficient region-level and fine-grained visual grounding. To address this challenge, we propose ReVA, a region-aware VQA model that employs a frozen CLIP ViT-L/14 Vision Transformer (ViT) and a Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct large language model (LLM) connected through a dual bridge that aligns both whole-image and region-level representations with the LLM's embedding space. The image bridge maps final transformer block features into image tokens. The region bridge maps cropped features from enriched intermediate features across ViT blocks so early texture and later object cues are more evident, into K region tokens for every bounding box. ReVA uses a detector stack that supplies automatic zero-shot bounding boxes that are both question-agnostic and question-dependent, using RAM++ (Recognize Anything Model), spaCy, and Grounding DINO. The image tokens and region tokens are concatenated as an LLM prompt prefix to jointly encode scene-level context and fine-grained regional evidence when answering questions. Evaluated on VQAv2, MMBench, POPE, and SEED-Bench, ReVA achieves 82.85% mean F1 on POPE, compared with 81.14% for an image-token baseline without region tokens. These results demonstrate that explicit region-aware visual representations reduce object hallucination and improve the factual grounding of MLLMs.
Anoop Senthil
School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science Queen Mary University of London London, United Kingdom