LookWise: Knowing When and Where to Look for Fine-Grained Visual Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
Authors: Yuxiang Shen, Hailong Huang, Zhenkun Gao, Xueheng Li, Man Zhou, Chengjun Xie, Haoxuan Che, Xuanhua He, +1 more
Organizations: the Institute of Intelligent Machines, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China, and also with the University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China · Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China · East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China · the University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China · the Institute of Intelligent Machines, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are shifting towards "Thinking with Images" by actively exploring image details. While effective, large-scale training is computationally expensive, which has spurred growing interest in lightweight, training-free solutions. However, existing training-free methods suffer from two flaws: perceptual redundancy from indiscriminate cropping, which increases computational cost and introduces noise; and a drift between semantic intent and spatial attention, which prevents accurate localization of user-focused regions. To address these challenges, we propose LookWise, a framework for adaptive visual reasoning. LookWise follows a two-stage pipeline: a confidence-based module decides when to look more carefully, and a semantic-guided localization module determines where to look. This design enables MLLMs to adaptively acquire fine-grained visual evidence without additional training. Experiments on fine-grained and high-resolution visual reasoning benchmarks show that LookWise consistently improves accuracy over strong baselines while achieving an approximately 4.0× inference speedup over the search-based method ZoomEye, demonstrating robust cross-model generalization.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Illustration of LookWise: enabling MLLMs to know when and where to look for adaptive visual reasoning.
Fig. 2: Probability density distributions of initial average confidence on the AOKVQA and POPE datasets.
Fig. 3: Limitations of indiscriminate cropping. Left: Cropping a region containing the “SLOW DOWN” sign misleads the model to answer “slow down,” even though the question asks what action is prohibited and the correct answer is “speeding.” Right: Cropping the drink area adds no new visual information, but the model’s prediction remains unchanged while additional computation is introduced.
Fig. 4: Overview of the LookWise framework. The model evaluates token confidence to decide when to look more carefully. If uncertain, it extracts key textual targets and uses them as queries in cross-attention over visual tokens to determine where to crop. The selected local regions are then provided together with the global image to produce the final answer.
Fig. 5: Comparison of localization precision. The baseline model often suffers from single-target bias (A) and attention drift (C). In contrast, LookWise explicitly decouples multiple queried targets to ensure complete coverage (B) and accurately identifies the intended subject (D). The attention maps show that semantic-guided localization suppresses noisy activations and maintains precise spatial focus.
Model
Method
Training-free
AOKVQA
POPE
V ∗ Bench
HR-Bench 4K
HR-Bench 8K
LLaVA-v1.5-7B
Baseline ∗ [ 24 ]
✓
71.00
86.98
48.68
36.13
32.13
DC 2 [ 20 ]
✓
-
-
57.60
-
39.50
VisCrop [ 37 ]
✓
-
-
62.30
46.25
35.75
MLLMs-Know ∗ [ 22 ]
✓
72.31
87.25
56.02
44.38
37.25
ZoomEye [ 21 ]
✓
70.56
88.94
83.25
49.88
48.63
Ours (LookWise)
✓
72.90
87.37
62.80
47.38
42.00
TABLE I: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods. Highest results are marked in darker colors ( Blue for LLaVA, Red for Qwen). The gray rows show the absolute improvement ( Δ ) of Ours over the Baseline . ∗ Results are reproduced by us using official implementations.
Fig. 6: Comparison of total GPU inference time (in minutes) across different methods (measured on NVIDIA H200 GPUs).
Decision Mechanism
AOKVQA
POPE
V*-Bench
HR 4K
HR 8K
LLM-Prompting
16m45s
1h33m
1h29m
1h47m
3h06m
Ours (Confidence)
12m33s
1h08m
1h22m
1h36m
3h01m
TABLE II: Total inference time comparison between LLM-Prompting and our Token Confidence decision mechanisms (measured on NVIDIA H200 GPUs).
Model
AOKVQA
V*-Bench
Qwen2.5VL-3B
w/o confidence-based decision
71.96%
85.86%
w/ confidence-based decision
73.10%
86.38%
Δ
+1.14%
+0.52%
TABLE III: Quantitative evaluation of confidence-based decision module.
Benchmark
Acc
Time
Crop%
AOKVQA
w/o confidence-based decision
71.96
26m24s
100%
w/ confidence-based decision
73.10
12m33s
32.40%
Δ
+1.14
-13m51s
-67.60%
V*-Bench
w/o confidence-based decision
85.86
1h04m
100%
TABLE IV: Performance and efficiency comparison (measured on NVIDIA H200 GPUs).
Model & Strategy
AOKVQA
POPE
V*-Bench
HR 4K
HR 8K
LLaVA-v1.5-7B
w/o Semantic-guided Localization
72.31%
87.25%
56.02%
44.38%
37.25%
w/ Semantic-guided Localization
72.90%
87.37%
62.80%
47.38%
42.00%
Δ
0.59%
0.12%
6.78%
3.00%
4.75%
Qwen2.5VL-3B
w/o Semantic-guided Localization
71.62%
89.12%
75.90%
66.36%
64.88%
TABLE V: Ablation on semantic-guided localization module.
Model
Baseline
Full Local Inspection
Confidence-based Decision ( λ )
Fixed Thresh.
(Original)
(All Inspect)
1.0
1.5
2.0
( τ=0.92 )
Threshold ( τ )
-
-
0.830
0.734
0.533
0.92
Qwen2.5-VL
71.44
71.96
72.58
73.10
72.49
72.05
TABLE VI: Sensitivity Analysis of the confidence-based decision module.
Dataset
Base
random
continuous
0.80
0.90
0.94
0.96
0.98
1.00
HR-4K
67.50
72.75
72.50
72.75
72.50
72.50
72.50
HR-8K
58.88
68.25
69.88
70.00
70.00
70.00
70.00
V*-Bench
75.90
81.15
84.81
86.38
86.38
85.86
85.86
AOKVQA
71.44
72.31
72.40
72.23
72.23
72.14
71.97
TABLE VII: Sensitivity analysis across multiple benchmarks under varying confidence thresholds τ .
Benchmark
Baseline
τ=0.96
Extraction Reduced
AOKVQA
71.44
72.23
10.39%
V*-Bench
75.90
86.38
14.13%
HR-Bench 8K
58.88
70.00
8.00%
HR-Bench 4K
67.50
72.50
10.00%
Average Δ
–
+9.35%
10.63%
TABLE VIII: Evaluation under a fixed threshold ( τ=0.96 )
Fig. 7: Qualitative examples of adaptive visual reasoning. Left: For small object perception, LookWise precisely targets the “Bag” to identify its purple color despite a complex background. Right: For fine-grained attribute recognition, the model isolates the “Blue Sail” to reveal the subtle spider logo.
Fig. 8: Spatial Reasoning with Multiple Targets. The model attends to both the "Baby stroller" and the "Person in orange," extracting a region that preserves their relative spatial position.
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) excel in cross-modal reasoning, they often struggle to perceive fine-grained details in complex high-resolution images. Recent training-free methods address this through image scaling and localized cropping. However, applying these manipulations indiscriminately introduces computational redundancy for simple queries and can degrade accuracy by truncating essential global context or introducing irrelevant background noise. To this end, we propose LazyMCoT, a dynamic and training-free framework that adaptively allocates visual grounding efforts based on sample difficulty. The framework features an Adaptive Routing mechanism that evaluates predictive uncertainty using first-token statistics from a single forward pass. This efficiently bypasses confident cases while ensuring the recall of difficult samples via conformal calibration. For these challenging cases, a Collaborative Grounding module integrates the inherent cross-modal attention of the model with an external visual expert through a two-stage refinement process. This refinement process generates a precise localized display to recover small or occluded targets. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks demonstrate that LazyMCoT rivals training-based approaches by simultaneously improving reasoning accuracy and reducing average inference latency. Our code is availble at https://github.com/TencentBAC/LazyMCoT.
Yifan Wang, Peiming Li, Shiyu Li +5
1Tencent BAC · School of Electronic and Computer Engineering, Peking University · School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow +1
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remain unreliable on fine-grained visual perception, even when high-resolution inputs preserve the necessary local details. We identify this limitation as visual context rot: decisive evidence may exist in the full image, yet fail to be reliably selected and used amid redundant visual context. We propose LOCUS (LOcal visual CUe Search), a training framework that teaches MLLMs to internalize local evidence search through a verifiable proxy task. During training, LOCUS provides a local crop as a visual cue and optimizes the model to recover its spatial support in the full image using an IoU-based reward. The visual cue is used only during training, leaving the standard image-question inference interface unchanged. Experiments across fine-grained perception, hallucination, general understanding, and reasoning benchmarks show that LOCUS improves localization-sensitive visual understanding while preserving broad capabilities. Attention analyses further indicate stronger focus on task-relevant evidence regions, suggesting that training-time visual cue search provides an effective route to internalized fine-grained evidence selection.
Zhou Tao, Fang Zhang, Zewen Ding +5
University of Science and Technology of China · State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often struggle with fine-grained perception, such as identifying small objects in high-resolution images or detecting key moments in long videos. Existing methods typically rely on complex, task-specific fine-tuning, which reduces generalizability and increases system complexity. In this work, we propose an effective, training-free framework that uses an MLLM's intrinsic uncertainty as proactive guidance. Our core insight is that a model's uncertainty decreases when provided with relevant visual information. We introduce a unified mechanism that scores candidate visual inputs by response uncertainty, enabling the model to autonomously focus on the most informative data. We apply this simple principle to three challenging visual tasks: Visual Search, Long Video Understanding, and Temporal Grounding, allowing off-the-shelf MLLMs to achieve performance competitive with specialized, fine-tuned systems. Our results demonstrate that leveraging intrinsic uncertainty is a powerful strategy for improving fine-grained multimodal performance.
Sanghwan Kim, Rui Xiao, Stephan Alaniz +2
1Technical University of Munich · 2Munich Center for Machine Learning · 20263Helmholtz Munich +2