AlignVAR: Towards Globally Consistent Visual Autoregression for Image Super-Resolution
Authors: Cencen Liu, Dongyang Zhang, Wen Yin, Jielei Wang, Tianyu Li, Ji Guo, Wenbo Jiang, Guoqing Wang, +1 more
Organizations: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China · Ubiquitous Intelligence and Trusted Services Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province
Visual autoregressive (VAR) models have recently emerged as a promising alternative for image generation, offering stable training, non-iterative inference, and high-fidelity synthesis through next-scale prediction. This encourages the exploration of VAR for image super-resolution (ISR), yet its application remains underexplored and faces two critical challenges: locality-biased attention, which fragments spatial structures, and residual-only supervision, which accumulates errors across scales, severely compromises global consistency of reconstructed images. To address these issues, we propose AlignVAR, a globally consistent visual autoregressive framework tailored for ISR, featuring two key components: (1) Spatial Consistency Autoregression (SCA), which applies an adaptive mask to reweight attention toward structurally correlated regions, thereby mitigating excessive locality and enhancing long-range dependencies; and (2) Hierarchical Consistency Constraint (HCC), which augments residual learning with full reconstruction supervision at each scale, exposing accumulated deviations early and stabilizing the coarse-to-fine refinement process. Extensive experiments demonstrate that AlignVAR consistently enhances structural coherence and perceptual fidelity over existing generative methods, while delivering over 10x faster inference with nearly 50% fewer parameters than leading diffusion-based approaches, establishing a new paradigm for efficient ISR.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Comparison between the VARSR and AlignVAR. AlignVAR enhances VAR by introducing an adaptive consistency mask for intra-scale modeling and full reconstruction supervision for inter-scale alignment.
Figure 2: Comparison of attention distribution. Visualization of attention maps for VARSR and AlignVAR shows that VARSR exhibits highly localized attention concentrated in nearby regions, whereas AlignVAR captures broader contextual dependencies through the proposed Spatial Consistency Autoregression (SCA), thereby enhancing spatial coherence within each scale.
Figure 3: Spatial inconsistency results in texture discontinuities, structural distortions.
Figure 4: Hierarchical inconsistency results in color shifts and structural misalignment.
Figure 5: Overall architecture of the proposed AlignVAR . AlignVAR comprises two complementary components: a Spatial Consistency Autoregression (SCA) that performs scale-wise prediction and reweights intra-scale features using adaptive masks, and a Hierarchical Consistency Constraint (HCC) that jointly supervises residual and full representations to recalibrate inter-scale dependencies.
Figure 6: Comparison of multi-scale reconstructions. AlignVAR alleviates cumulative error propagation across scales and preserves more consistent structural and textural details than VARSR [ 28 ] .
Datasets
Metrics
GAN-based
Diffusion-based
VAR-based
BSRGAN
Real-ESR
SwinIR
LDM
StableSR
DiffBIR
PASD
UPSR
VARSR
AlignVAR
DIV2K-Val
PSNR ↑
24.42
24.30
23.77
21.66
23.26
23.49
23.59
24.87
24.41
24.35
SSIM ↑
0.6164
0.6324
0.6186
0.4752
0.5670
0.5568
0.5899
0.6294
0.6189
0.6021
LPIPS ↓
0.3511
0.3267
0.3910
0.4887
0.3228
0.3638
0.3611
0.3173
0.2985
0.2955
DISTS ↓
0.2369
0.2245
0.2291
0.2693
0.2116
0.2177
0.2134
0.2132
0.2167
0.2162
FID ↓
50.99
44.34
44.45
55.04
28.32
34.55
39.74
39.48
28.64
25.71
Table 1: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on synthetic and real-world benchmarks. The best and second-best results are highlighted in bold red and underline blue , respectively.
Figure 7: Qualitative comparisons with representative methods.
Models
Params
Steps
Inference Time
StableSR
1409.1M
200
15.32s
DiffBIR
1900.4M
20
5.03s
PASD
1716.7M
50
5.94s
UPSR
1530.9M
5
2.79s
VARSR
1102.9M
10
0.52s
AlignVAR
1056.5M
10
0.43s
Table 2: Complexity comparison.
Metrics
RealSR
DrealSR
w/o SCA
RI
SG
w/o SCA
RI
SG
PSNR ↑
26.77
26.67
26.11
29.32
28.68
28.54
LPIPS ↓
0.2847
0.2855
0.2871
0.2975
0.3077
0.3184
DISTS ↓
0.2079
0.2108
0.2123
0.2253
0.2289
0.2340
MANIQA ↑
0.4351
0.4435
0.4553
0.4285
0.4312
0.4685
MUSIQ ↑
66.74
67.21
68.53
62.75
63.06
63.83
Table 3: Ablation study of the SCA. “w/o” denotes removing SCA, “RI” indicates random input, and “SG” represents the structural guidance used in our model.
Figure 8: Comparison of supervision domains for HCC.
Metrics
RealSR
DrealSR
w/o HCC
HCC
w/o HCC
HCC
PSNR ↑
25.85
26.11
28.23
28.54
LPIPS ↓
0.2898
0.2871
0.3208
0.3184
DISTS ↓
0.2175
0.2123
0.2411
0.2340
MANIQA ↑
0.4431
0.4553
0.4442
0.4685
MUSIQ ↑
67.06
68.53
62.85
63.83
Table 4: Ablation on the Hierarchical Consistency Constraint.
Settings
PSNR ↑
LPIPS ↓
DISTS ↓
MANIQA ↑
MUSIQ ↑
λ=0.5
25.83
0.2874
0.2184
0.4403
67.56
λ=1.0
26.11
0.2871
0.2123
0.4553
68.53
λ=1.5
26.21
0.2785
0.2107
0.4465
67.85
λ=2.0
26.35
0.2703
0.2079
0.4337
67.03
Table 5: Effect of the balancing coefficient λ on RealSR.
Figure 9: Analysis of the adaptive mask at different training stages. SG denotes the structural guidance extracted from the LR input.
Figure 10: Quantitative analysis of the Hierarchical Consistency Constraint on RealSR. Shown are the mean prediction errors across scales (left) and the MUSIQ scores under identical random perturbations injected at different scales (right).
Figure 11: Computational comparison among diffusion-based SR methods (DiffBIR [ 23 ] , LDM [ 29 ] , PASD [ 46 ] , UPSR [ 52 ] ), the VAR-based baseline (VARSR [ 28 ] ), and our AlignVAR. AlignVAR achieves high performance with substantially lower complexity than other models.
Datasets
Metrics
GAN-based
Diffusion-based
VAR-based
BSRGAN
Real-ESR
SwinIR
LDM
StableSR
DiffBIR
PASD
UPSR
VARSR
AlignVAR
RealLR200
NIQE ↓
4.3817
4.2048
4.2157
4.2533
4.2516
4.1715
4.9330
4.7606
4.4579
4.0617
MANIQA ↑
0.5462
0.5582
0.3741
0.3049
0.5841
0.6066
0.5902
0.4206
0.4536
0.6237
CLIPIQA ↑
0.5679
0.5389
0.5596
0.5253
0.6068
0.6797
0.6509
0.6397
0.6144
0.6734
MUSIQ ↑
64.87
62.94
63.55
55.19
63.30
68.20
62.06
66.46
62.12
69.36
Table 6: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on RealLR200. The best and second-best results are highlighted in bold red and underline blue , respectively.
Figure 12: User study results comparing the super-resolution outputs of different models.
Figure 13: Attention maps at different scales. AlignVAR expands the attention range, capturing dependencies over large areas.
Figure 14: Ablation results of SCA and HCC evaluated using Edge IoU [ 47 ] across different scales. The full AlignVAR achieves the highest edge alignment quality at all scales. Removing SCA results in the largest degradation, demonstrating its key role in maintaining spatial consistency and recovering fine-grained edges. HCC provides complementary improvements by enhancing hierarchical consistency, but its influence is comparatively weaker.
Figure 15: Impact of Spatial Consistency Autoregression (SCA) on attention maps. The attention range is significantly broader when SCA is applied.
Figure 16: Effect of the hyperparameter λ on training dynamics. We compare four values of λ (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0) in terms of loss and token prediction accuracy across different scales. A smaller λ leads to faster convergence but lower accuracy, particularly at the middle scales (e.g., 6×6 and 9×9 ), while λ=1.0 achieves the best overall accuracy with stable convergence. Larger λ values slow down loss convergence and degrade accuracy, indicating that excessively large consistency constraints hinder optimal learning.
Figure 17: Comparison with state-of-the-art methods on the RealLR200 dataset. The large image on the left is the output of AlignVAR, while the small patches on the right show enlarged crops from the LR input and competing models.
Figure 18: Additional qualitative comparisons. The large image on the left shows the output of AlignVAR, while the small patches on the right present enlarged crops from the LR input and competing methods.
Figure 19: Additional qualitative comparisons. The large image on the left shows the output of AlignVAR, while the small patches on the right present enlarged crops from the LR input and competing methods.
Recent advancements in visual autoregressive models (VAR) have demonstrated their effectiveness in image generation, highlighting their potential for real-world image super-resolution (Real-ISR). However, adapting VAR for ISR presents critical challenges. The next-scale prediction mechanism, constrained by causal attention, fails to fully exploit global low-quality (LQ) context, resulting in blurry and inconsistent high-quality (HQ) outputs. Additionally, error accumulation in the iterative prediction severely degrades coherence in ISR task. To address these issues, we propose VARestorer, a simple yet effective distillation framework that transforms a pre-trained text-to-image VAR model into a one-step ISR model. By leveraging distribution matching, our method eliminates the need for iterative refinement, significantly reducing error propagation and inference time. Furthermore, we introduce pyramid image conditioning with cross-scale attention, which enables bidirectional scale-wise interactions and fully utilizes the input image information while adapting to the autoregressive mechanism. This prevents later LQ tokens from being overlooked in the transformer. By fine-tuning only 1.2% of the model parameters through parameter-efficient adapters, our method maintains the expressive power of the original VAR model while significantly enhancing efficiency. Extensive experiments show that VARestorer achieves state-of-the-art performance with 72.32 MUSIQ and 0.7669 CLIPIQA on DIV2K dataset, while accelerating inference by 10 times compared to conventional VAR inference.
Visual Autoregressive (VAR) models have emerged as a powerful paradigm for image synthesis by performing hierarchical next-scale prediction. However, VAR models are inherently prone to cascading error propagation, where subtle coarse-scale mispredictions are amplified across the hierarchy, ultimately distorting the final synthesis. To mitigate this, we propose AID-VAR, a plug-and-play framework that enhances pre-trained VARs through Adversarially Injected Diagnosis. Instead of a standard passive generation, AID-VAR introduces a proactive error-correction mechanism inspired by the adversarial feedback in GANs. We deploy a discriminator to diagnose fidelity gaps at each scale transition, coupled with a lightweight guidance injector. This module operates as a non-invasive adapter that refines the feature manifold of a frozen VAR backbone, effectively steering the generation toward the distribution of real images without destabilizing the pre-trained latent space. Furthermore, to rigorously evaluate this cross-scale progression, we introduce the Inter-Scale Consistency Score (ISCS), a novel metric that quantifies the fidelity and structural alignment between consecutive resolution scales. Experimental results across various backbones demonstrate that AID-VAR delivers sharper textural details and fewer structural distortions with negligible overhead. For instance, AID-VAR-d20 achieves a 16% improvement in FID with only a 3% increase in parameters. These results establish AID-VAR as a highly efficient and scalable pathway for upgrading large-scale VAR generators, enhancing global coherence and local detail without altering training data, base architectures, or sampling schedules. Code is available at https://github.com/bijiw515/AID-VAR.
Ligong Bi, Tao Huang, Jianyuan Guo +1
1Shanghai Jiao Tong University · 2City University of Hong Kong · 3The University of Sydney
We introduce a multi-scale Image Super Resolution (ISR) method building on recent advances in Visual Auto-Regressive (VAR) modeling. VAR models break image tokenization into additive, gradually increasing scales, using Residual Quantization (RQ), an approach that aligns perfectly with our target ISR task. Previous works taking advantage of this synergy suffer from two main shortcomings. First, due to the limitations in RQ, they only generate images at a predefined fixed scale, failing to map intermediate outputs to the corresponding image scales. They also rely on large backbones or a large corpus of annotated data to achieve better performance. To address both shortcomings, we introduce two novel components to the VAR training for ISR, aiming at increasing its flexibility and reducing its complexity. In particular, we introduce a) a Hierarchical Image Tokenization (HIT) approach that progressively represents images at different scales while enforcing token overlap across scales, and b) a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) regularization term that, relying solely on the (LR,HR) pair, encourages the transformer to produce the latter over the former. Our proposed HIT acts as a strong inductive bias for the VAR training, resulting in a small model (300M params vs 1B params of VARSR), that achieves state-of-the-art results without external training data, and that delivers multi-scale outputs with a single forward pass.
Isma Hadji, Enrique Sanchez, Adrian Bulat +2
Samsung AI Center Cambridge, UK · Technical University of Iasi, Romania · Queen Mary University of London, UK