Guiding Sparse Neural Networks with Neurobiological Principles to Elicit Biologically Plausible Representations

Neural networks have long strived to emulate the learning capabilities of the human brain. While deep neural networks (DNNs) draw inspiration from the brain in neuron design, their training methods diverge from biological foundations. Backpropagation, the primary training method for DNNs, requires substantial computational resources and fully labeled datasets, presenting major bottlenecks in development and application. This work demonstrates that by returning to biomimicry, specifically mimicking how the brain learns through pruning, we can solve various classical machine learning problems while utilizing orders of magnitude fewer computational resources and no labels. Our experiments successfully personalized multiple speech recognition and image classification models, including ResNet50 on ImageNet, resulting in increased sparsity of approximately 70% while simultaneously improving model accuracy to around 90%, all without the limitations of backpropagation. This biologically inspired approach offers a promising avenue for efficient, personalized machine learning models in resource-constrained environments.

Efficient representation learning is essential for optimal information storage and classification. However, it is frequently overlooked in artificial neural networks (ANNs). This neglect results in networks that can become overparameterized by factors of up to 13, increasing redundancy and energy consumption. As the demand for large language models (LLMs) and their scale increase, these issues are further highlighted, raising significant ethical and environmental concerns. We analyze our previously developed biologically inspired learning rule using information-theoretic concepts, evaluating its efficiency on the MNIST classification task. The proposed rule, which emulates the brain's structural plasticity, naturally prevents overparameterization by optimizing synaptic usage and retaining only the essential number of synapses. Furthermore, it outperforms backpropagation (BP) in terms of efficiency and storage capacity. It also eliminates the need for pre-optimization of network architecture, enhances adaptability, and reflects the brain's ability to reserve 'space' for new memories. This approach advances scalable and energy-efficient AI and provides a promising framework for developing brain-inspired models that optimize resource allocation and adaptability.

Biologically plausible learning models aim to explain how neural circuits can implement effective learning under the constraints of real neurons. Although significant progress has been made, a major remaining challenge is that existing models often allow neurons or synapses to represent mixed-sign values, both positive and negative, in violation of a basic aspect of cortical circuitry -- Dale's constraint: biological neurons are either excitatory or inhibitory, but not both, and synapses cannot change sign. In this work, we address this discrepancy by introducing a biologically motivated neural architecture in which both neural activations and learning signals are represented by non-negative activity, and synapses have fixed sign, while still supporting backpropagation-like learning. Our approach uses two complementary interacting non-negative channels to represent positive and negative contributions, inspired by evidence of on-off representations in the brain. These channels are implemented through a simple neural circuit motif, which is repeated throughout the network in both bottom-up and top-down pathways. Combined with a local Hebbian learning rule, the resulting model propagates learning signals and updates weights using only local interactions between neurons. We show theoretically that our learning scheme can exactly recover the backpropagation update despite relying solely on non-negative error signals. Empirically, beyond satisfying stronger biological constraints, the on-off architecture learns efficient representations, yielding substantial gains over comparable vanilla networks on the Tiny ImageNet benchmark. These results demonstrate that effective learning can emerge from biologically plausible mechanisms without requiring mixed-sign signals, providing a step toward more realistic models of neural computation.