Hold-One-Shot-Out (HOSO) for Validation-Free Few-Shot CLIP Adapters

Recent adapter-based CLIP tuning (e.g., Tip-Adapter) is a strong few-shot learner, achieving efficiency by caching support features for fast prototype matching. However, these methods rely on global uni-modal feature vectors, overlooking fine-grained patch relations and their structural alignment with class text. To bridge this gap without incurring inference costs, we introduce a novel asymmetric training-only framework. Instead of altering the lightweight adapter, we construct a high-capacity auxiliary Heterogeneous Graph Teacher that operates solely during training. This teacher (i) integrates multi-scale visual patches and text prompts into a unified graph, (ii) performs deep cross-modal reasoning via a Modality-aware Graph Transformer (MGT), and (iii) applies discriminative node filtering to extract high-fidelity class features. Crucially, we employ a cache-aware dual-objective strategy to supervise this relational knowledge directly into the Tip-Adapter's key-value cache, effectively upgrading the prototypes while the graph teacher is discarded at test time. Thus, inference remains identical to Tip-Adapter with zero extra latency or memory. Across standard 1-16-shot benchmarks, our method consistently establishes a new state-of-the-art. Ablations confirm that the auxiliary graph supervision, text-guided reasoning, and node filtering are the essential ingredients for robust few-shot adaptation. Code is available at https://github.com/MR-Sherif/TOGA.git.

Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning (CDFSL) aims to adapt large-scale pretrained models to specialized target domains with limited samples, yet the few-shot fine-tuning of vision-language models like CLIP remains underexplored. By establishing multiple fine-tuning baselines of CLIP for CDFSL, we find adapter-based methods (e.g., LoRA) consistently outperform prompt-based ones (e.g., MaPLe), contrary to in-domain scenarios. To make those effective in-domain methods competitive again in CDFSL, we analyze this phenomenon and discover LoRA's superiority stems from rectifying the collapsed attention of visual CLS token, enhancing modality alignment and class separation by focusing on text-related visual regions. Further, we find textual EOS token exhibit much better attention to visual samples, and CLIP's standard contrastive loss weakly constrains modality alignment. Based on these insights, we propose Semantic Probe, a plug-and-play attention rectification framework for both adapter- and prompt-based methods. Extensive experiments on four CDFSL benchmarks validate our rationale, achieving state-of-the-art performance and benefiting both fine-tuning paradigms. Codes will be released.

Many few-shot adaptation methods for vision-language models classify with a convex combination of the zero-shot text prototype and the mean of the K labelled image features, with a single blending ratio routinely tuned on held-out labels, often on the test set itself. We ask what the family's own bias-variance justification invites: what is the right ratio, can it be estimated without validation data, and is finding it where the performance is? First, the ratio minimising prototype mean-squared error has a closed form whose support-set plug-in is exactly a positive-part James-Stein coefficient shrinking towards the text prototype. Across 4,800 cells (ten datasets, five backbones including SigLIP, five shot counts, five seeds, four prompt tiers) this theoretically optimal ratio is a reliable estimate of the wrong quantity: on the 950 primary-tier cells where it is defined it trails a test-set-oracle ratio by 8.5 points. It saturates near 1, discarding the text prior for a nearest-class-mean classifier, because 78% of the text-image prototype distance it treats as bias is a class-independent offset that the arg max largely cancels. We prove the mechanism and bound its share of the damage at 26% by a counterfactual. Second, leave-one-out on the support set alone sets a ratio landing within 0.9 points of the oracle blend, so it is estimable without validation data. Third, validation-free linear probes beat even the oracle-tuned blend: CLAP by +1.9 points and LP++ by +1.5 on average, and at K >= 4 all four validation-free baselines sit above the oracle, the linear probes by margins excluding zero. These results locate the ceiling in the model class, not the hyperparameter: the ratio can be set near-optimally for free, and it is still not where the performance is. Code, cached features, per-cell records: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Liangzhi-Li/clipbench-blending