Aligning the True Semantics: Constrained Decoupling and Distribution Sampling for Cross-Modal Alignment

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP learn a shared embedding space for images and text, yet their representations remain geometrically separated, a phenomenon known as the modality gap. This gap limits tasks requiring cross-modal interchangeability, such as captioning and joint clustering. Existing post-processing approaches can partially improve cross-modal compatibility; however, we show through geometric analysis that they primarily reduce the global centroid offset while leaving the underlying distributional mismatch intact. We decompose the modality gap into a Centroid Gap and a Distribution Gap, and demonstrate that the Distribution Gap is the true predictor of cross-modal task quality ($R^2 = 0.986$), whereas the commonly used Raw Gap is misleading ($R^2 = 0.691$). Motivated by this observation, we propose TPC-CMA (Three-Phase Curriculum for Cross-Modal Alignment), a fine-tuning framework that explicitly reduces both components. The proposed CMA jointly mitigates centroid offsets and reshapes the distributional structure, while a three-phase curriculum with gradient-aware scheduling progressively introduces alignment during training to enable stable optimization. Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly improves cross-modal alignment. With $α_{\text{target}}{=}0.05$, the modality gap is reduced by 66.6% with only 4.84% accuracy drop. Under stronger alignment ($α_{\text{target}}{=}0.5$), the gap is reduced by 82.3%, clustering ARI improves from 0.318 to 0.516, and captioning CIDEr increases by 57.1% over the original model. Our code and pre-trained models will be made publicly available upon acceptance.

Fine-grained cross-modal alignment aims to establish precise local correspondences between vision and language, forming a cornerstone for visual question answering and related multimodal applications. Current approaches face challenges in addressing patch redundancy and ambiguity, which arise from the inherent information density disparities across modalities. Recently, Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as promising solutions to bridge this gap through their robust semantic generation capabilities. However, the dense textual outputs from MLLMs may introduce conflicts with the original sparse captions. Furthermore, accurately quantifying semantic relevance between rich visual patches and concise textual descriptions remains a core challenge. To overcome these limitations, we introduce the Semantic-Enhanced Patch Slimming (SEPS) framework, which systematically addresses patch redundancy and ambiguity. Our approach employs a two-stage mechanism to integrate unified semantics from both dense and sparse texts, enabling the identification of salient visual patches. Additionally, it leverages relevance-aware selection with mean value computation to highlight crucial patch-word correspondences, thereby improving cross-modal similarity assessment. Comprehensive experiments on Flickr30K and MS-COCO datasets validate that SEPS achieves superior performance, surpassing existing approaches by 23%-86% in rSum across diverse model architectures, with notable enhancements in text-to-image retrieval scenarios. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/Sweet4tars/seps.git.

Different machine learning models can represent the same underlying concept in different ways. This variability is particularly valuable for in-the-wild multimodal retrieval, where the objective is to identify the corresponding representation in one modality given another modality as input. This challenge can be effectively framed as a representation alignment problem. For example, given a sentence encoded by a language model, retrieve the most semantically aligned image based on representations produced by an image encoder, or vice versa. To gain insights into the performance impact of different metrics, embedding spaces, and representation alignment for retrieval tasks, we first empirically investigate the geometric relationships between visual and textual embeddings derived from both vision-language models and combined unimodal models. We then align these representations using four standard similarity metrics as well as two learned ones, implemented via neural networks of different architectures with varying losses across multiple benchmarks. Our experimental findings indicate that cosine similarity consistently outperforms all the investigated metrics in representation alignment tasks, and that Wasserstein distance provides a complementary perspective on cross-modal distributional differences. We also observe that our proposed custom contrastive loss is advantageous over the MSE loss for aligning image and text representations, for both multilayer perceptrons and transformer-based models. Taken together, our findings offer novel insights and practical considerations for researchers working in multimodal information retrieval, particularly in real-world, cross-modal applications. Our code is publicly available.