Dynamic Momentum Recalibration in Online Gradient Learning

Momentum-based optimizers are widely used in modern deep learning, yet the relations among momentum recursion, update geometry, and acceleration remain only partially understood. We develop an $\textbf{A}$DMM-$\textbf{I}$nspired $\textbf{M}$omentum (AIM) framework based on residual-penalty variable splitting, which interprets momentum as a multiplier-like correction driven by the splitting residual. AIM recovers the exponential moving average of gradients from an ADMM-style multiplier update and separates two mechanisms that are usually intertwined in practical optimizers: the residual penalty determines the update geometry, whereas the approximation of the objective-related subproblem determines the acceleration form. Building on AIM, we propose $\textbf{R}$elativistic $\textbf{A}$daptive gradient $\textbf{D}$escent with $\textbf{A}$ccelerated $\textbf{R}$esidual (RADAR), which combines relativistic adaptive geometry, decoupled residual correction, and second-order momentum filtering to improve the update direction and momentum estimation. We establish stochastic convergence through a variance-perturbed Lyapunov drift analysis. Experiments on supervised vision learning, language modeling, and reinforcement learning show that RADAR achieves consistent improvements over strong adaptive optimizer baselines.

Muon replaces the momentum buffer of each weight matrix by its orthogonal polar factor. We ask what this orthogonalization does near an optimum, where minibatch noise dominates the gradient. Under a Gaussian noise model, the expected Muon update becomes a scaled gradient step, so a linear method with a suitably matched learning rate reproduces Muon's first-order mean response. The stochastic update is a different matter: after the response is matched, Muon retains a nonlinear residual that is uncorrelated with the input noise and contributes additional covariance. A Hermite expansion shows how momentum acts on this residual. Its higher-order components decorrelate faster than the linear component, so momentum suppresses the residual's accumulated covariance relative to the linear part, but never eliminates it. In a local quadratic surrogate that evaluates the residual on the stationary noise buffer, the residual adds stationary covariance and raises the stationary loss floor at every stable step size, while leaving the contraction dynamics unchanged. Simulations of the full nonlinear recursion on quadratics and measurements on frozen transformer gradients support each step of this picture. Together, the results make a theoretical case for replacing orthogonalization by response-matched momentum SGD once optimization becomes noise-dominated.

Momentum is central to stochastic optimization in deep learning, including the training of large language models. Classical momentum methods typically rely on a fast exponential moving average (EMA) scheme, which discounts past gradients on a fixed timescale and may underweight older gradients that remain informative. This creates a trade-off between retaining long-term history and adapting to recent changes. We introduce Hybrid Momentum (HyM), which combines a linearly weighted average of past gradients with a geometrically discounted fast momentum. The former assigns weights proportional to the gradients' iteration indices and retains a growing span of history, while the latter emphasizes recent gradients. This hybrid construction is modular and can be combined with adaptive preconditioning and other update transformations. In particular, we propose HyMUON, which applies Newton--Schulz orthogonalization to the hybrid direction. Illustrative examples and controlled experiments demonstrate the benefits of combining gradient information across these two timescales. Across image classification, machine translation, and language modeling, HyM and HyMUON match or improve upon strong baselines. HyMUON improves over Muon on IWSLT14, and in both the 100k- and 600k-step GPT-2 124M OpenWebText regimes. For LLaMA-1.3B pretraining on C4, HyMUON achieves a final validation loss of 2.777, compared with 2.903 for Muon.