Organizations: State Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography and the Faculty of Information Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100. · School of Cyber Science and Technology, Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen university, Shenzhen, China.
Underwater images often suffer from severe degradation caused by light absorption and scattering, leading to color distortion, low contrast and reduced visibility. Existing Underwater Image Enhancement (UIE) methods can be divided into two categories, i.e., prior-based and learning-based methods. The former rely on rigid physical assumptions that limit the adaptability, while the latter often face data scarcity and weak generalization. To address these issues, we propose a Physics-Semantics-Guided Underwater Image Enhancement Network (PSG-UIENet), which couples the Retinex-grounded illumination correction with the language-informed guidance. This network comprises a Prior-Free Illumination Estimator and a Semantics-Guided Image Restorer. In particular, the restorer leverages the textual descriptions generated by the Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training (CLIP) model to inject high-level semantics for perceptually meaningful guidance. Since multimodal UIE data sets are not publicly available, we also construct a large-scale image-text UIE data set, namely, LUIQD-TD, which contains 6,418 image-reference-text triplets. To explicitly measure and optimize semantic consistency between textual descriptions and images, we further design an Image-Text Semantic Similarity (ITSS) loss function. To our knowledge, this study makes the first effort to introduce both textual guidance and the multimodal data set into UIE tasks. Extensive experiments on our data set and four publicly available data sets demonstrate that the proposed PSG-UIENet achieves superior or comparable performance against fifteen state-of-the-art methods.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Comparison of three Retinex-based UIE methods, including Retinexformer [ 5 ] , RetinexMamba [ 6 ] , and our PSG-UIENet. In terms of each image, the Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) [ 7 ] , and Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) [ 8 ] values computed between the corresponding reference image and it are shown at the top-left corner. These results highlight the effectiveness of the Retinex theory [ 9 ] in alleviating underwater image degradation.
Fig. 2: Sixteen degraded-reference-text triplets contained in the LUIQD-TD. Each triplet consists of three components: a degraded image (top-left) and the associated reference image (top-right) and textual description (bottom). The data set spans diverse underwater scenarios, including coral reefs, marine life, divers, submerged wrecks, and underwater vehicles, thereby offering rich semantic and visual information for multi-modal UIE tasks.
Fig. 3: Statistical analysis of the textual annotations in the LUIQD-TD, including (a) the distribution of word frequencies, (b) the distribution of caption lengths, and (c) the distribution of VQA-based [ 39 ] image–text similarity scores.
Fig. 4: The architecture of our PSG-UIENet, which comprises two modules: (a) a Prior-Free Illumination Estimator that generates multi-scale light-enhanced representations and (b) a Semantics-Guided Image Restorer that performs multi-modal alignment, fusion and enhancement using a dual-branch structure.
Fig. 5: The architecture of the Semantics-Guided Encoder-Decoder Network. This network is built on top of a symmetric encoder-decoder network, which consists of a series of Transformer-Conv layers for joint global-local feature extraction. In addition, the cross-modal attention mechanism and a Cross-Attention FiLM Module (CFM) integrate textual semantics, enabling progressive image reconstruction with semantic and visual fusion.
Method
Test-T622
Test-U80
Test-S110
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
UDCP [ 11 ]
11.51
47.60
26.94
9.51
33.66
41.74
10.07
34.29
37.66
Retinex [ 14 ]
10.56
58.10
39.12
10.50
61.31
36.49
8.32
53.46
40.41
HE [ 43 ]
16.01
71.30
28.07
16.60
77.86
25.67
15.41
74.79
30.05
HLRP [ 15 ]
13.00
23.83
33.11
13.56
22.76
33.90
12.55
29.24
33.18
MMLE [ 16 ]
17.07
72.11
25.41
18.56
76.21
22.57
17.32
77.39
22.77
TABLE I: The results of the full-reference quantitative evaluation of the proposed PSG-UIENet and 15 baselines on three real-world test sets. The best and second best results are highlighted in the Red Bold and Blue Italic fonts, respectively.
Method
Test-L622
Test-U80
Test-S110
Test-C60
Test-R53
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
UDCP [ 11 ]
36.71
55.91
29.73
36.40
29.92
32.01
28.19
25.41
33.07
3.24
Retinex [ 14 ]
36.83
46.41
34.38
49.83
31.79
39.43
29.20
49.85
37.52
2.61
HE [ 43 ]
41.32
45.10
37.82
44.04
34.26
45.01
34.69
41.50
34.95
1.67
HLRP [ 15 ]
36.83
0.57
38.12
0.59
37.33
0.91
30.16
3.57
28.53
1.26
MMLE [ 16 ]
45.26
37.88
43.49
30.99
43.15
35.05
37.06
24.95
33.15
24.67
TABLE II: The results of the non-reference quantitative evaluation of the proposed PSG-UIENet and 15 baselines on five real-world test sets. The best and second best results are highlighted in the Red Bold and Blue Italic fonts, respectively.
Fig. 6: The results produced by 15 baselines and our method in terms of a degraded image in the Test-L622 test set. Here, the PSNR, SSIM and LPIPS values, computed between a degraded or enhanced image and the reference image, are shown at the top-left corner of the image.
Fig. 7: The results produced by 15 baselines and our method in terms of a degraded image in the Test-U80 test set. Here, the PSNR, SSIM and LPIPS values, computed between a degraded or enhanced image and the reference image, are shown at the top-left corner of the image.
Fig. 8: The results produced by 15 baselines and our method in terms of a degraded image in the Test-S110 test set. Here, the PSNR, SSIM and LPIPS values, computed between a degraded or enhanced image and the reference image, are shown at the top-left corner of the image.
Fig. 9: The results produced by 15 baselines and our method in terms of a degraded image in the Test-C60 test set. Here, both the PAUQA and UIF values are shown at the top-left corner of the degraded image and enhanced images.
Fig. 10: The results produced by 15 baselines and our method in terms of a degraded image in the Test-R53 test set. Here, both the PAUQA and UIF values are shown at the top-left corner of the degraded image and enhanced images.
Method
Test-L622
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
w/o IE
23.49
89.70
9.56
51.27
67.43
w/o IR
22.44
86.47
11.60
48.73
77.70
w/o TA
23.69
90.11
8.90
51.10
67.14
w/o CFM
23.62
89.73
9.21
50.78
67.67
Ours
24.07
90.19
9.11
51.34
67.70
TABLE III: Comparison between our method and its four variants obtained by removing a key component in PSG-UIENet.
Method
Test-L622
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
w/o Text
23.66
89.93
9.21
51.48
67.41
w/ MHSA
23.25
89.52
9.61
51.03
70.03
Ours
24.07
90.19
9.11
51.34
67.70
TABLE IV: Comparison between our method and its two variants obtained by removing the text path or replacing the cross-attention mechanism with the MHSA mechanism.
θ
Test-L622
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PAUQA ↑
UIF ↑
0
23.82
89.93
9.19
51.33
67.23
0.25
22.08
88.78
9.73
50.34
67.55
0.5 (Default)
24.07
90.19
9.11
51.34
67.70
0.75
23.23
89.58
9.55
51.05
68.52
1.0
22.87
88.99
10.29
50.32
67.52
TABLE V: Comparison of five masking ratio ( θ ) values.
In recent years, learning-based underwater image enhancement (UIE) techniques have rapidly evolved. However, distribution shifts between high-quality enhanced outputs and natural images can hinder semantic cue extraction for downstream vision tasks, thereby limiting the adaptability of existing enhancement models. To address this challenge, this work proposes a new learning mechanism that leverages Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to empower UIE models with semantic-sensitive capabilities. To be concrete, our strategy first generates textual descriptions of key objects from a degraded image via VLMs. Subsequently, a text-image alignment model remaps these relevant descriptions back onto the image to produce a spatial semantic guidance map. This map then steers the UIE network through a dual-guidance mechanism, which combines cross-attention and an explicit alignment loss. This forces the network to focus its restorative power on semantic-sensitive regions during image reconstruction, rather than pursuing a globally uniform improvement, thereby ensuring the faithful restoration of key object features. Experiments confirm that when our strategy is applied to different UIE baselines, significantly boosts their performance on perceptual quality metrics as well as enhances their performance on detection and segmentation tasks, validating its effectiveness and adaptability.
Guodong Fan, Shengning Zhou, Genji Yuan +3
Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai, China · Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China · Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, China
Underwater image enhancement (UIE) aims to recover clear images from observations affected by wavelength-dependent absorption, scattering, and spatially nonuniform degradation. Although existing generative methods can handle complex degradations, severe information loss may lead to semantic drift in the restored results. To address this issue, we propose RPL-UIE, a two-stage teacher--student framework for reliable prior learning. In the teacher stage, the network learns reliable and complementary spatial priors characterizing appearance and photometric properties from paired degraded and reference images. In the student stage, the network takes only degraded images as input and learns to emulate the teacher's prior extraction capability, thereby providing more reliable restoration guidance for the enhancement process without requiring reference images at inference. To reduce the prior-learning discrepancy between the teacher and student models, we further develop Residual Prior Refinement Diffusion (RPRD) and Frequency-Aware Prior Residual Calibration (FPRC). RPRD uses the coarse priors as anchors and progressively predicts the necessary corrections in the residual space. FPRC retains stable low-frequency residual components and selectively modulates high-frequency detail residuals, producing calibrated priors to support high-quality reconstruction. Experiments on multiple UIE benchmarks demonstrate competitive restoration performance. Downstream underwater object detection and instance segmentation experiments further demonstrate the improved utility of enhanced images for visual perception, while tests on real-world data captured by a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) support the practical applicability of RPL-UIE.
Yifan Chen, Jiaming Liu, Ye Zheng +2
College of Future Information Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China · Institute of Artificial Intelligence (TeleAI), China Telecom, China · Faculty of Robot Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China +1
The underwater images are captured within diverse water-medium conditions, leading to complex degradation, including color bias, low contrast, and blur effect. Recently, learning-based methods have demonstrated their potential for underwater image enhancement (UIE). However, most of the previous work focus on the training strategy or network design to make the enhanced result aligned well with the labels in datasets, ignoring that the labels are selected from the enhanced results of previous UIE methods and these pseudo-labels are noisy. Consequently, the performance of their models is not satisfactory to a certain extent. However, collecting the true labels of the underwater images is challenging. In this work, we propose a transfer learning-based UIE that does not require underwater images to have paired noisy or true labels for learning. Instead, the UIE task is first divided into global color correction, haze removal, and background noise suppression following the underwater physics. Then multiple types of prior from other vision tasks are leveraged as cross-domain supervision in each step. In this way, a novel UIE is available via transfer learning, and the physics-aligned UIE decomposition provides theoretical soundness. Qualitative and quantitative experiments demonstrate that our proposal based on physics and priors fusion achieves SOTA performance in the UIE task and effectively boosts downstream vision tasks, significantly outperforming benchmark methods. Project repo: https://github.com/Haru2022/P2-UIE.
Haochen Hu, Yanrui Bin, Zhengyan Zhang +3
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR