Organizations: Signal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, USA · Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, University of Southern California, USA · Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Accent is an integral part of society, reflecting multiculturalism and shaping how individuals express identity. The majority of English speakers are non-native (L2) speakers, yet current Text-To-Speech (TTS) systems primarily model American-accented English due limited accented data. We propose Accent Vector, a controllable representation that enables accent manipulation in multilingual TTS without requiring accented training data. Accent Vector is derived by fine-tuning a TTS system on native speech of a different language (i.e. non-English) and computing task vectors capturing accent characteristics (i.e. in English). By scaling and interpolating the vector, we achieve fine-grained control over accent strength and generate mixed-accent speech. In addition, it generalizes beyond English, enabling accent control across multiple languages. Objective and human evaluations confirm the effectiveness of Accent Vector for fine-grained and compositional accent control.
Figures & tables
\multirow 2* Approach
Requiring
Explicit
Zero-shot Speaker
Cross-Accent
Multilingual
Accented Dataset
Accent Control
Adaptation
Mixing
Support
Xinyuan et al. [ 20 ]
Required
✗
✓
✗
✗
Onda et al. [ 15 ]
Not Required
✗
✓
✗
✗
MacST [ 16 ]
Not Required
✗
✓
✗
✗
Lertpetchpun et at. [ 21 ]
Not Required
Phoneme-level
✗
✗
✗
Accent Vector (Ours)
Not Required
Weight Scaling
✓
✓
✓
Table 1: Comparison between accented TTS models.
Figure 1: Accent Vector Framework. The top panel illustrates the fine-tuning procedure, and the bottom panel shows the inference process for generating accented speech. During inference, a language ID token (e.g., [en]) is concatenated with the transcript and provided as input to the model.
Figure 2: Accent Vector Arithmetic. The figure illustrates the computation of the Accent Vector, its scaling for accent strength control, and the interpolation of multiple Accent Vectors for mixed-accent synthesis.
Language
Training Dataset
Subset
Duration (Hours)
UTMOS (Train)
UTMOS (Eval)
English
VCTK
English
8.9
3.92
3.86
Spanish
CommonVoice-sp
Penisular
52.21
2.79
2.61
Hindi
IndicVoices-R
Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh
27.2
2.57
2.57
German
CommonVoice-de
German-Non-NRW and -NRW Area
375.12
2.93
2.86
French
CommonVoice-fr
France
337.56
2.63
2.50
Mandarin
KeSpeech
Beijing, Northeastern
125.53
2.57
2.68
Table 2: Languages and corresponding datasets. UTMOS is reported after filtering low-quality samples.
\multirow 2* Target Accent
Target Accent Prob. (%)
Target Accent SIM. (%)
\multirow 2*WER / CER
\multirow 2*SSIM
\multirow 2*UTMOS
Pretrained
Finetuned
Pretrained
Finetuned
British (England Accent)
23.3
56.7 \color gray (+143.83%)
0.47
0.73
5.46 / 4.31
0.90
3.61
Spanish
15.5
39.7 \color gray (+156.37%)
0.41
0.61
17.3 / 10.3
0.88
2.86
Hindi
2.2
24.2 \color gray (+1021.29%)
0.40
0.64
10.4 / 6.5
0.88
3.10
French
12.2
23.2 \color gray (+90.10%)
0.38
0.56
18.9 / 11.4
0.87
2.76
German
14.3
27.4 \color gray (+91.14%)
0.50
0.52
11.0 / 6.8
0.86
3.04
Table 3: Objective evaluation on accent shifting from American English to each target accent. We report the accent prediction probabilities (Prob) and accent cosine similarities measured by VoxProfile, intelligibility (WER/CER), speaker similarity (SSIM), and naturalness (UTMOS).
\multirow 2* Target Language
English Accent Prob. (%)
English Language Prob. (%)
\multirow 2*WER / CER
\multirow 2*SSIM
\multirow 2*UTMOS
Pretrained
Finetuned
Pretrained
Finetuned
Spanish
1.20
44.69
0.04
38.1
30.1 / 14.6
0.89
3.49
German
8.57
41.57
1.13
35.1
34.2 / 12.6
0.89
3.55
Mandarin
0.00
3.03
0.03
10.8
– / 31.6
0.82
3.51
Table 4: Objective evaluation on English-accented speech generation for non-English languages. We report English accent probability measured by VoxProfile, English language prediction probability by the LID model, intelligibility (WER/CER), speaker similarity (SSIM), and naturalness (UTMOS).
Figure 3: Control of accent strength using the task vector coefficient. We evaluate the model fine-tuned on British and Hindi by measuring accent probability and word error rate (WER) across different task vector coefficients. The first and second rows correspond to the results of British- and Hindi-accented English, respectively. A clear trade-off between accent strength and intelligibility is observed; increasing the coefficient produces a stronger accent but results in higher WER.
Figure 4: Effect of the task vector coefficient when mixing multiple Accent Vectors. We combine Spanish and English Accent Vectors using coefficients α and 1−α , respectively. Accent probabilities for Spanish and English accents are evaluated across different values of α . The vertical dashed line indicates the accent probability of the pretrained model of each accent.
\multirow 2* Target Accent
Prob on Target Accent (%)
SIM on Target Accent
\multirow 2*WER / CER
\multirow 2*SSIM
\multirow 2*MOS
Pretrained
Finetuned
Pretrained
Finetuned
Spanish + British
14.58/9.29
5.61/20.45
0.412/0.295
0.307/0.442
8.58/5.06
0.84
3.22
Mandarin + British
27.38/4.31
13.30/17.77
0.557/0.156
0.445/0.355
13.0/9.57
0.82
3.00
Hindi + British
2.16/3.39
7.11/9.64
0.397/0.057
0.447/0.157
8.24/5.60
0.86
3.32
Spanish + Hindi
14.58/1.05
24.29/10.92
0.412/0.271
0.561/0.508
11.3/7.14
0.88
3.03
Mandarin + Hindi
27.38/0.87
28.84/8.70
0.557/0.316
0.617/0.535
19.1/13.4
0.85
2.79
Table 5: Results of interpolating the Accent Vectors. VoxProfile measures accent characteristics, cosine similarity evaluates speaker similarity, and UTMOS. The order of accent probabilities follows the order of the target accent columns. For example, the probabilities for the first row are for Spanish/British. The LoRA weights for both languages are merged with a coefficient of 0.5 each.
Accent conversion and controllability remain fundamental challenges in cross-lingual text-to-speech (TTS), particularly for low-resource and phonetically diverse Indic languages. While recent large language model (LLM)-based TTS systems exhibit strong cross-lingual generalization, they provide limited explicit control over accent characteristics and intensity. In this paper, we propose CrossAccentTTS, a framework that enables both accent control and conversion while preserving speaker identity. Specifically, we introduce an Accent Intensity Controller (AIC) that injects weighted language embeddings into the accent subspace, allowing smooth interpolation between accents and fine-grained modulation of accent strength at inference time. Experiments on the Indic Multilingual and L2-arctic datasets shows that CrossAccent-TTS achieves precise control of accent intensity, outperforming strong baselines in accent similarity and controllability by maintaining speaker similarity and naturalness.
Ram Annamdevula, Ankit Tatawat, Ashishkumar P. Gudmalwar +2
Accent plays a crucial role in speaker identity and inclusivity in speech technologies. Existing accented text-to-speech (TTS) systems either require large-scale accented datasets or lack fine-grained phoneme-level controllability. We propose a accented TTS framework that combines phonological rules with a multilingual TTS model. The rules are applied to phoneme sequences to transform accent at the phoneme level while preserving intelligibility. The method requires no accented training data and enables explicit phoneme-level accent manipulation. We design rule sets for Spanish- and Indian-accented English, modeling systematic differences in consonants, vowels, and syllable structure arising from phonotactic constraints. We analyze the trade-off between phoneme-level duration alignment and accent as realized in speech timing. Experimental results demonstrate effective accent shift while maintaining speech quality.
Thanathai Lertpetchpun, Yoonjeong Lee, Jihwan Lee +3
Signal Analysis and Interpretation Lab, University of Southern California, USA · Department of Linguistics, University of Southern California
Accent text-to-speech (TTS) aims to synthesize speech with a target accent while preserving speaker identity, but faces two key challenges: disentangling accent from speaker characteristics and effectively conditioning speech generation on the two disentangled factors. In this paper, we propose Joycent, a diffusion-based accent TTS framework that addresses both challenges. Our key idea is to separate accent and speaker information in both representation learning and TTS conditioning. Joycent uses WhisAID, a Whisper-based accent encoder with gradient reversal to learn speaker-disentangled accent representations, and introduces layer-specific conditional layer normalization to inject accent and speaker information at different stages of the text encoder. We evaluate Joycent on the Mandarin Regional Accent Corpus (MRAC) with seen and unseen speakers, including a challenging cross-accent setting where the speaker and accent prompts come from different accents. Experimental results show that Joycent improves accent similarity over existing methods while maintaining strong speaker similarity, with consistent gains under the challenging cross-accent setting. Subjective evaluation further confirms improved naturalness, accent similarity, and speaker preservation. The audio samples are available at https://oshindow.github.io/joycent/.
Xintong Wang, Junchuan Zhao, Ye Wang
School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore