StreamReady: Learning What to Answer and When in Long Streaming Videos

Streaming video models should respond the moment an event unfolds, not after the moment has passed. Yet existing online VideoQA benchmarks remain largely retrospective. They pause the video at fixed timestamps, pose questions about current or past events, and score models only at those moments. This protocol leaves streaming predictions untested. To close this gap, we introduce SPOT-Bench, featuring multi-turn proactive queries that evaluate general streaming perception and assistive capabilities required by an always-on, real-time assistant. SPOT-Bench comes with Timeliness-F1, a consolidated metric that measures streaming predictions by their temporal precision and balanced coverage across the entire video. Our benchmark reveals: (i) offline models detect events reliably but spam predictions unprompted; (ii) post-training for silence reduces spamming but induces unresponsiveness; (iii) half of the streaming video expects no response, which we term dead-time - compute spent here does not affect response latency. These findings motivate AsynKV, a training-free streaming adaptation of offline models, that retains their event perception while improving their streaming behavior. AsynKV features a long-short term memory, utilized efficiently by scaling compute during dead-time. It serves as a strong baseline on SPOT-Bench, outperforming existing streaming models, and achieves state-of-the-art on retrospective benchmarks.

Streaming video assistance requires models to answer asynchronous questions from an observed prefix under a fixed context budget. Existing approaches model response timing or compress history, but an online state formed before future questions are known can omit visual details before later questions reveal their relevance; the retained state alone cannot recover them. We introduce Watch-Think-Interact (WTI), a closed-loop framework for multi-question streaming video reasoning. WTI maintains compact natural-language memory entries tagged with source-video time ranges; these entries support direct reasoning when sufficient and otherwise anchor selective recall of finer visual evidence. For each question, WTI answers when current context and memory suffice, continues watching when required evidence has not appeared, or recalls a relevant past interval and decides again after incorporating the returned chunks, without replaying the full observed history. To train this behavior, we construct WTI-82K, comprising 82,335 timed questions across 4,812 causally aligned trajectories, and develop Stream-GDPO to optimize complete multi-question streaming rollouts using trajectory-level feedback for response timing, source-video recall, and memory updates. WTI achieves state-of-the-art aggregate performance among the compared open-source streaming baselines, reaching 83.3% on StreamingBench and 73.6% weighted overall accuracy on OVO-Bench.

Streaming video-language models must decide not only what to answer, but whether the evidence needed for the current question has arrived. Existing systems learn that decision as a separate trigger; we ask whether an unmodified model already computes it. We show that frozen VideoLLMs carry a linearly readable evidence-readiness signal, labelled from timestamped evidence rather than from model output. It decodes in all seven models of a shared byte-identical evaluation (AUROC 0.733-0.905 under the strictest not-ready sampling, where a fitted clock is near chance), and a probe fitted without any of a benchmark family's footage still reads that family. It is question-conditioned: on byte-identical windows, changing only the question reverses the readout on 66.1% of pairs, while every question-blind control is at chance by construction. The model can answer incorrectly and still encode readiness: AUROC remains 0.722 among wrong answers. Readiness also beats uncertainty estimators and their supervised combination on latency-matched answer selection, and tracks independent human judgments more closely than confidence. Released streaming triggers are also linear readouts, yet a trained trigger read on its own base model's activations is approximately orthogonal to readiness and decodes it far less accurately than a probe. We turn the readout into Readiness Gating, an answer-timing policy that improves accuracy by up to +9.75 pp at matched video duration with negligible computational overhead. How much it gains varies with the accuracy headroom the task makes available: across 26 configurations the gain tracks that headroom, and an intervention that moves it over identical pixels moves the gain with it.