Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models demonstrate impressive zero-shot generalization but frequently suffer from a "Precision-Reasoning Gap" in cluttered environments. This failure is driven by background-induced feature dilution, where high-frequency semantic noise corrupts the geometric grounding required for precise manipulation. To bridge this gap, we propose Concept-Gated Visual Distillation (CGVD), a training-free, model-agnostic inference framework that stabilizes VLA policies. CGVD operates by parsing instructions into safe and distractor sets, utilizing a two-layer target refinement process--combining cross-validation and spatial disambiguation--to explicitly penalize false positives and isolate genuine manipulation targets. We then process the scene via Fourier-based inpainting, generating a clean observation that actively suppresses semantic distractors while preserving critical spatial geometry and visual proprioception. Extensive evaluations in highly cluttered manipulation tasks demonstrate that CGVD prevents performance collapse. In environments with dense semantic distractors, our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, achieving a 77.5% success rate compared to the baseline's 43.0%. By enforcing strict attribute adherence, CGVD establishes inference-time visual distillation as a critical prerequisite for robust robotic manipulation in the clutter.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Comparison of manipulation task execution in cluttered environments. While a standard VLA model (left) struggles with object confusion in a highly cluttered scene, our CGVD approach (right) successfully identifies and places the target object (”spoon”) on the towel.
Fig. 2: Overview of the CGVD pipeline. Stage 1: The language instruction is parsed to extract a safe set tar and a distractor set. Stage 2: SAM3 segments both sets independently, producing a safe-set mask and a distractor mask via dual-channel segmentation. Stage 3: Set-theoretic gating subtracts the safe-set mask from the distractor mask, and LaMa inpaints the resulting regions to produce a distilled observation passed to the VLA policy.
Fig. 3: Success rate vs. number of distractors. Left: semantic distractors. Right: random distractors. Top: spoon on towel. Bottom: carrot on plate. Dashed lines represent the baseline VLA; solid lines represent +CGVD. Colors denote specific model architectures. To ensure statistical significance, each data point represents the average success rate over 200 independent evaluation rollouts (20 episodes × 10 random seeds), totaling 19,200 episodes for the results visualized in this figure.
Fig. 4: Qualitative Analysis of Attention Repair. (Top) The baseline policy suffers from attention dispersion, focusing on the distractors rather than the spoon. (Bottom) Our CGVD method inpaints the distractors, forcing the attention mechanism to collapse onto the true target.
Simple Prompt
Complex Prompt
# Distractors
π0
CGVD
Δ
π0
CGVD
Δ
0
86.0
90.0
+4.0
85.0
87.0
+2.0
1
80.0
78.0
− 2.0
74.0
69.0
− 5.0
2
73.0
87.0
+14.0
69.0
77.0
+8.0
3
68.0
75.0
+7.0
64.0
74.0
+10.0
4
75.0
87.0
+12.0
57.0
73.0
+16.0
TABLE I: Attribute Distractor Sensitivity. Success rates on Put spoon on towel with attribute distractors. Results are averaged over 10 random seeds (20 episodes per seed). CGVD shows stronger average robustness on both simple and complex prompts, though both methods exhibit non-monotonic variance at low distractor counts.
Configuration
SR (%)
Baseline (no CGVD)
43.0
CGVD (full pipeline)
77.5
– Mean-color fill
56.5
– Two-layer target refinement
65.0
– Robot mask protection
73.0
TABLE II: Ablation study on the Spoon on Towel task ( π0 , 18 semantic distractors). Each row removes one component from the full CGVD pipeline. To ensure statistical significance, every configuration was evaluated over 200 episodes (20 episodes across 10 seeds).
Phase
Base π0 (ms)
CGVD (ms)
Initialization ( t=0 )
—
4,914
Execution ( t>0 )
317
421
TABLE III: System Latency. CGVD concentrates segmentation and inpainting at t=0 ; runtime compositing adds moderate overhead at the VLA control frequency.
Vision--Language--Action (VLA) policies have shown strong progress in mapping language instructions and visual observations to robotic actions, yet their reliability degrades in cluttered scenes with distractors. By analyzing failure cases, we find that many errors do not arise from infeasible motions, but from instance-level grounding failures: the policy often produces a plausible grasp trajectory that lands slightly off-target or even on the wrong object instance. To address this issue, we propose TAG (Target-Agnostic Guidance), a simple inference-time guidance mechanism that explicitly reduces distractor- and appearance-induced bias in VLA policies. Inspired by classifier-free guidance (CFG), TAG contrasts policy predictions under the original observation and an object-erased observation, and uses their difference as a residual steering signal that strengthens the influence of object evidence in the decision process. TAG does not require modifying the policy architecture and can be integrated with existing VLA policies with minimal training and inference changes. We evaluate TAG on standard manipulation benchmarks, including LIBERO, LIBERO-Plus, and VLABench, where it consistently improves robustness under clutter and reduces near-miss and wrong-object executions.
Jiaying Zhou, Zhihao Zhan, Ruifeng Zhai +5
Sun Yat-sen University · Guangdong Key Lab of Big Data Analysis & Processing · X-Era AI Lab
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have driven significant progress in robotic manipulation, yet they fundamentally struggle with the vision-override phenomenon. Driven by the severe modality imbalance between dense visual streams and sparse linguistic instructions, VLAs frequently fall prey to causal confusion. Instead of treating language as the primary causal driver, the policy entirely bypasses the original instruction by overfitting to spurious visual confounders, such as prominent objects or familiar layouts. To systematically alleviate this bias, we formalize the process of action generation as a Dual-path Deconfounding Graph (DDG) and propose CofactVLA, a novel causal intervention framework. By dynamically constructing a language-masked counterfactual branch within a single forward pass, CofactVLA isolates and neutralizes visual confounders through two synergistic mechanisms. First, Action-Level Orthogonal Projection Guidance (OPG) geometrically projects the factual velocity field away from the counterfactual visual bias during continuous flow matching, extracting the pure semantic intent. Second, Feature-Level Counterfactual Covariance Reduction (CCR) mathematically deconfounds latent representations by penalizing the positive eigenspace of the covariance difference, explicitly suppressing dominant visual shortcuts while preserving the causal language intent. Extensive experiments demonstrate that CofactVLA establishes a new state-of-the-art across diverse simulation benchmarks. Beyond simulation, real-world robot experiments demonstrate the causal efficacy of our method in bridging the generalization gap, yielding a 52.3% absolute success rate gain under out-of-distribution scenarios.
Current Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models often struggle with high-precision robotic manipulation. We attribute this limitation primarily to their visual attention being dispersed across task-irrelevant regions. To address this issue, we propose ActGaze, a training approach that guides VLA policies to gaze on task-relevant regions, much like humans gaze on critical visual cues while executing precise movements. Unlike prior methods that rely on external labels for gaze supervision, ActGaze derives spatial supervision directly from the VLA's own action objective by using counterfactual visual interventions to identify regions that are critical for action prediction. Extensive real-robot experiments on four high-precision robotic manipulation tasks demonstrate that ActGaze induces more focused visual attention on task-relevant regions and consistently outperforms the base VLA policy and other visual-grounding approaches.
Jinxuan Zhu, Jiaheng Wang, Chao Tang +7
Samsung Robotics eXperience · National University of Singapore