Organizations: School of Information Science and Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China · Institute of Advanced Technology, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China · CHN Energy Digital Intelligence Technology Development (Beijing) Co., LTD., Beijing, China
Most sRGB-based LLIE methods suffer from entangled luminance and color, while the HSV color space offers insufficient decoupling at the cost of introducing significant red and black noise artifacts. Recently, the HVI color space has been proposed to address these limitations by enhancing color fidelity through chrominance polarization and intensity compression. However, existing methods could suffer from channel-level inconsistency between luminance and chrominance, and misaligned color distribution may lead to unnatural enhancement results. To address these challenges, we propose the Variance-Driven Channel Recalibration for Robust Low-Light Enhancement (VCR), a novel framework for low-light image enhancement. VCR consists of two main components, including the Channel Adaptive Adjustment (CAA) module, which employs variance-guided feature filtering to enhance the model's focus on regions with high intensity and color distribution. And the Color Distribution Alignment (CDA) module, which enforces distribution alignment in the color feature space. These designs enhance perceptual quality under low-light conditions. Experimental results on several benchmark datasets demonstrate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance compared with existing methods.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: (a) Different feature channels focus on different regions. By selectively filtering channels, regions with consistent brightness and color distributions are enhanced, leading to improved overall enhancement performance. (b) Consistency in color space distribution helps the image achieve a more natural appearance, leading to more realistic and visually pleasing enhancement results.
Fig. 2: The overall pipeline of the VCR process begins by transforming the input into the HVI space. Next, it is processed by the Channel Adaptive Adjustment module, which includes Variance-aware Channel Filtering and Triplet Channel Enhancement stage. These techniques aim to emphasize regions with a high consistency of luminance and chromaticity by filtering and enhancing the channels. After this recalibration, the features are refined, and the HV components are aligned with ground-truth statistics via the Color Distribution Alignment (CDA) module to mitigate color shifts. Finally, the enhanced output is reconstructed in the sRGB color space.
Fig. 3: Visual results of various methods on the LOL dataset. Regions highlighted by green and yellow boxes indicate differences in local details.
Fig. 4: Qualitative comparison of enhancement results on the unpaired dataset in difficult condition, generated by various methods.
Fig. 5: Qualitative comparison of enhancement results on the unpaired dataset in one difficult condition.
Fig. 6: (a) Qualitative comparison of TCE module. (b) Ablation visualization results of different space. (c)Visual comparison between prior methods and ours. The top row presents the RGB images, while the bottom row shows the corresponding discrete color histograms.
Fig. 7: (a) shows ablation results for varying quantities of CAA modules, while (b) presents results from experiments using different module types on the LOLv2-REAL dataset.
Fig. 8: Qualitative comparison of VCF module.
Fig. 9: More visual results of various methods on the LOLv1 dataset.
Methods
Complexity
LOLv1
LOLv2-Real
LOLv2-Synthetic
Params/M
FLOPs/G
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
RetinexNet [ 22 ]
0.84
584.47
18.915
0.427
0.470
16.097
0.401
0.543
17.137
0.762
0.255
KinD [ 43 ]
8.02
34.99
23.018
0.843
0.156
17.544
0.669
0.375
18.320
0.796
0.252
ZeroDCE [ 44 ]
0.075
4.83
21.880
0.640
0.335
16.059
0.580
0.313
17.712
0.815
0.169
RUAS [ 45 ]
0.003
0.83
18.654
0.518
0.270
15.326
0.488
0.176
13.765
0.638
0.305
LLFlow [ 46 ]
17.42
358.4
24.998
0.871
0.117
17.433
0.831
0.315
24.870
0.919
0.067
TABLE I: Quantitative results of PSNR ↑ /SSIM ↑ and LPIPS ↓ on the LOL (v1 and v2) datasets. The best performance is in red , and the second best is in blue .
Fig. 10: More visual results of various methods on the LOLv2 and SICE dataset.
Methods
SICE
SID
Unpaired
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
BRISQUE ↓
NIQE ↓
RetinexNet
12.424
0.613
15.695
0.395
23.286
4.558
ZeroDCE
12.452
0.639
14.087
0.090
26.343
4.763
RUAS
8.656
0.494
12.622
0.081
26.372
4.800
LLFlow
12.737
0.617
16.226
0.367
26.087
4.221
CIDNet
13.435
0.642
22.904
0.676
23.521
3.523
TABLE II: Quantitative result on SID, SICE and the five unpaired datasets (DICM, LIME, MEF, NPE, and VV). The top-ranking score is in red .
Exp.
CAA
TCE
VCF(λVCF)
CDA(λCDA)
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
1
23.972
0.817
0.135
2
✓
24.158
0.825
0.129
3
✓
✓
24.364
0.839
0.116
4
✓
✓
✓
24.519
0.873
0.112
5
✓
✓
✓
✓
24.758
0.893
0.105
TABLE III: Ablation studies of modules.
Method
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
w/o TCE
24.683
0.874
TCE-Vanilla Conv
24.702
0.889
Ours
24.758
0.893
TABLE IV: Ablation of TCE module.
Methods
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
HVI (CIDNet)
24.111
0.871
HVI (Ours)
24.758
0.893
HSV (CIDNet)
21.349
0.801
HSV (Ours)
22.104
0.853
TABLE V: Comparison between CIDNet and our method in different color spaces on LOLv2-Real.
Method
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
w/o Ft1
24.613
0.881
w/o Ft2
24.562
0.879
w/o Ft3
24.598
0.877
Ours
24.758
0.893
TABLE VI: Ablation of three-branch structure.
Metrics
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
Masking Ratio
Ratio=1/5
23.997
0.853
0.141
Ratio=1/4
24.516
0.872
0.126
Ratio=1/3
24.758
0.893
0.105
Ratio=1/2
22.963
0.804
0.207
TABLE VII: Ablation on the masking ratio of Variance‐aware Channel Filtering (VCF) module.
Setting
Similarity
CIDNet (HVI features vs. GT)
0.8788
C1 (small variance channels vs. GT)
0.8965
C2 (large variance channels vs. GT)
0.8549
Ours (final features vs. GT)
0.9009
TABLE VIII: Similarity comparison under different settings.
Fig. 11: (a) Failure cases of the proposed method under extreme nighttime scenarios. (b) Comparison visualization of SID dataset.
Fig. 12: More visual results of various methods on the unpaired dataset.
Low-light imaging often introduces color bias caused by the low signal-to-noise ratio and the image formation process. Although recent low-light image enhancement methods have achieved strong brightness recovery, faithful color restoration remains challenging, manifesting as overall color bias together with local under- and over-saturation. To address this issue, we propose CAGE, a cylindrical color correction framework with adaptive color debiasing and gamut-harmonized saturation rectification for color-faithful low-light image enhancement. We first introduce AdaLAB, a cylindrical adaptive LAB color space that provides a decoupled and image-specific basis for uniform color correction. Building on this color space, we further develop AdaCCT, an adaptive cylindrical color transform with forward and inverse transforms for the conversion between RGB and AdaLAB color space, as well as necessary color debiasing and saturation rectification. The forward transform suppresses embedded color bias before backbone enhancement by reorganizing the chromatic distribution through chromatic-plane shifting and scaling, while the inverse transform achieves faithful saturation rectification through out-of-gamut lightness compensation. Extensive experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CAGE achieves more faithful color restoration, specifically reduces color bias and saturation abnormality, and delivers better overall visual quality across different low-light enhancement backbones. The code is available at https://yangzhichen763.github.io/CAGE/.
Low-light image enhancement (LLIE) must correct ambiguous exposure without overwriting structure already supported by the input. Generative transport can model exposure ambiguity; however, its flexibility may also alter observable geometry and chromatic content. Moreover, fixed invertible color coordinates are usually treated only as representations, although their inverse mappings reshape the RGB-domain gradients received by the enhancement network. To address these issues, we propose Structure-Anchored Rectified Flow (SA-RF), which maintains correspondence through separate chromaticity/intensity stems, a scale-matched condition pyramid, and HybridAda. HybridAda assigns location-specific retrieval to spatial cross-attention and global exposure modulation to pooled AdaLN. We further introduce BC-IHV, a learnable Box--Cox polar color space whose analytically invertible intensity mapping controls the inverse-gradient dynamic range through a single exponent. This allows the representation to balance dark-range expansion and gradient conditioning instead of adopting a fixed linear or logarithmic law. Experiments on three LOL benchmarks, blind image-quality evaluation, and cross-dataset tests demonstrate consistent reconstruction and perceptual advantages over the sota. Controlled studies further support the effectiveness of both the proposed framework and color representation.
Yi Ai, Zheng Chen, Yuanhao Cai +2
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · Johns Hopkins University
Recent low-light image enhancement (LLIE) methods have driven brightness and structural fidelity close to that of normally-exposed images, yet their outputs still exhibit systematic color shifts such as greenish skies, yellowish faces, and warm-tinted white objects. We attribute this to end-to-end LLIE training coupling brightness, structure, and color within a single network, leaving the color channels weakly supervised. We recast color restoration as an independent sub-problem and decouple it from brightness enhancement, realizing it as a general-purpose post-processing module built on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). Rather than relying solely on parametric color priors learned during training, the module dynamically retrieves a reference image from an external high-quality color knowledge base and injects its color distribution into a color-restoration network to correct residual bias. The design has three components: (i) a dual-index FAISS retriever built on intermediate VGG19 features, capturing textural and structural similarity through global mean and variance statistics; (ii) GlobalSPHistAdaIN, which reduces the reference spatial-preserving color histogram to a global color vector and modulates network features via adaptive instance normalization, removing dependence on pixel-level correspondence; and (iii) a residual formulation that predicts a color correction over the front-end output. Across LOLv1, LOLv2-Real, and LOLv2-Synthetic, the module consistently improves color-specific metrics, and it remains effective when the front end is swapped among CPGA-Net++, LLFormer, FLIGHTNet, and IAT, confirming cross-front-end generality. Ablations show that a VGG19 dual index outperforms CLIP-based retrieval, indicating that color restoration depends on textural and structural similarity rather than high-level semantics.
Li-Wei Lu, Shaou-Gang Miaou
Department of Electronic Engineering, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taoyuan 320, Taiwan