Exhaustive Circuit Mapping of a Single-Cell Foundation Model Reveals Massive Redundancy, Heavy-Tailed Hub Architecture, and Layer-Dependent Differentiation Control

Motivation: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) decompose foundation model activations into interpretable features, but causal feature-to-feature interactions across network depth remain unknown for biological foundation models. Results: We introduce causal circuit tracing by ablating SAE features and measuring downstream responses, and apply it to Geneformer V2-316M and scGPT whole-human across four conditions (96,892 edges, 80,191 forward passes). Both models show approximately 53 percent biological coherence and 65 to 89 percent inhibitory dominance, invariant to architecture and cell type. scGPT produces stronger effects (mean absolute d = 1.40 vs. 1.05) with more balanced dynamics. Cross-model consensus yields 1,142 conserved domain pairs (10.6x enrichment, p < 0.001). Disease-associated domains are 3.59x more likely to be consensus. Gene-level CRISPRi validation shows 56.4 percent directional accuracy, confirming co-expression rather than causal encoding.

Background: Single-cell foundation models such as Geneformer and scGPT encode rich biological information, but whether this includes causal regulatory logic rather than statistical co-expression remains unclear. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) can resolve superposition in neural networks by decomposing dense activations into interpretable features, yet they have not been systematically applied to biological foundation models. Results: We trained TopK SAEs on residual stream activations from all layers of Geneformer V2-316M (18 layers, d=1152) and scGPT whole-human (12 layers, d=512), producing atlases of 82525 and 24527 features, respectively. Both atlases confirm massive superposition, with 99.8 percent of features invisible to SVD. Systematic characterization reveals rich biological organization: 29 to 59 percent of features annotate to Gene Ontology, KEGG, Reactome, STRING, or TRRUST, with U-shaped layer profiles reflecting hierarchical abstraction. Features organize into co-activation modules (141 in Geneformer, 76 in scGPT), exhibit causal specificity (median 2.36x), and form cross-layer information highways (63 to 99.8 percent). When tested against genome-scale CRISPRi perturbation data, only 3 of 48 transcription factors (6.2 percent) show regulatory-target-specific feature responses. A multi-tissue control yields marginal improvement (10.4 percent, 5 of 48 TFs), establishing model representations as the bottleneck. Conclusions: These models have internalized organized biological knowledge, including pathway membership, protein interactions, functional modules, and hierarchical abstraction, yet they encode minimal causal regulatory logic. We release both feature atlases as interactive web platforms enabling exploration of more than 107000 features across 30 layers of two leading single-cell foundation models.

Current single-cell foundation model benchmarks universally extract final layer embeddings, assuming these represent optimal feature spaces. We systematically evaluate layer-wise representations from scFoundation (100M parameters) and Tahoe-X1 (1.3B parameters) across trajectory inference and perturbation response prediction. Our analysis reveals that optimal layers are task-dependent (trajectory peaks at 60% depth, 31% above final layers) and context-dependent (perturbation optima shift 0-96% across T cell activation states). Notably, first-layer embeddings outperform all deeper layers in quiescent cells, challenging assumptions about hierarchical feature abstraction. These findings demonstrate that "where" to extract features matters as much as "what" the model learns, necessitating systematic layer evaluation tailored to biological task and cellular context rather than defaulting to final-layer embeddings.