Variational Garrote for Sparse Inverse Problems

We study the recovery of sparse functions from finite, noisy, and indirect observations in the framework of statistical inverse learning. The unknown is modeled as an element of $\ell^1$, and observations are generated through a possibly nonlinear forward operator $A:\ell^1\to H$, where $H$ is a vector-valued reproducing kernel Hilbert space. We propose an $\ell^1$-regularized empirical risk minimizer and develop a theoretical analysis of its statistical properties. Under mild assumptions, we establish almost-sure consistency and derive non-asymptotic high-probability convergence rates in both the prediction and $\ell^1$ reconstruction norms. The rates depend on the source smoothness parameter $r$, characterized by a variational source condition, and the effective dimension exponent $b$, describing the polynomial spectral decay of the covariance operator. We further prove matching minimax lower bounds, showing that the obtained convergence rates are optimal. To relate the theory to practical sparsity models, we consider finitely smoothing operators of the form $A=G\circ S$, where $S$ is a synthesis operator, and show that approximation-space assumptions imply the required variational source conditions. In particular, we prove that membership in the approximation space $k_t$ is equivalent to polynomial decay of the best $n$-term approximation error. Finally, we verify the assumptions for two representative inverse problems: reaction coefficient identification in elliptic PDEs and sparse computed tomography. For filtered Radon transforms, we derive explicit effective-dimension asymptotics, yielding concrete convergence rates for standard image models and sparsifying systems.

Generative (diffusion) priors demonstrate remarkable performance in addressing inverse problems in imaging. Yet, for scientific and medical imaging, it is crucial that reconstruction techniques remain stable and reliable under imperfect settings. Typical definitions of stability encompass the notion of ''convergent regularization'', robustness to out-of-distribution data, and to inaccuracies in the forward operator or noise model. We evaluate these properties numerically. Furthermore, we benchmark generative approaches against modern optimization-based methods inspired by the widely used variational techniques. Our results give insights for which settings and applications generative priors can deliver state-of-the-art reconstructions, and on those in which they fall short or may even be problematic.

Gaussian processes (GPs) offer appealing properties but are costly to train at scale. Sparse variational GP (SVGP) approximations reduce cost yet still rely on Cholesky decompositions of kernel matrices, ill-suited to low-precision, massively parallel hardware. While one can construct valid variational bounds that rely only on matrix multiplications (matmuls) via an auxiliary matrix parameter, optimising them with off-the-shelf first-order methods is challenging. We make the inverse-free approach practical by proposing a better-conditioned bound and deriving a matmul-only natural-gradient update for the auxiliary parameter, markedly improving stability and convergence. We further provide simple heuristics, such as step-size schedules and stopping criteria, that make the overall optimisation routine fit seamlessly into existing workflows. Across regression and classification benchmarks, we demonstrate that our method 1) serves as a drop-in replacement in SVGP-based models (e.g., deep GPs), 2) recovers similar performance to traditional methods, and 3) can be faster than baselines when well tuned.