Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) has become a dominant paradigm for deploying LLMs in multi-task scenarios due to its extreme parameter efficiency. While Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) based LoRA variants have achieved promising results by dynamically routing tokens to different low-rank experts, they largely overlook the hierarchical nature of task complexity. Existing methods typically employ experts with uniform architectures, limiting their ability to capture diverse feature granularities required by distinct tasks--where some tasks demand high-level semantic abstraction while others require fine-grained syntactic manipulation. To bridge this gap, we propose Expert Pyramid Tuning (EPT), a novel architecture that integrates the multi-scale feature pyramid concept from computer vision into the realm of PEFT. Unlike standard LoRA, EPT decomposes task adaptation into two stages: (1) A shared meta-knowledge Subspace that encodes universal linguistic patterns in low dimensions; (2) A Pyramid Projection Mechanism that utilizes learnable up-projection operators to reconstruct high-dimensional features at varying scales. A task-aware router then dynamically selects the optimal combination of these multi-scale features. Extensive experiments across multiple multi-task benchmarks demonstrate that EPT significantly outperforms SOTA MoE-LoRA variants. Crucially, thanks to the re-parameterization capability of our design, EPT achieves this performance improvement while simultaneously reducing the number of training parameters.
Figures & tables
Rank
MRPC
RTE
SST-2
CoLA
1
89.7
77.6
94.4
60.9
2
89.2
78.7
94.6
60.0
4
88.7
80.5
94.8
61.9
8
89.2
77.6
94.5
63.3
16
89.2
80.1
94.4
62.3
32
89.5
79.1
94.5
60.5
Table 1: LoRA-based Fine-tuning Performance of T5-base with varying ranks on different tasks.
Figure 1: The overall framework of EPT. The overall architecture of EPT resembles a parameter pyramid, consisting of a shared meta-knowledge subspace and multiple deconvolutional projection layers of varying dimensions.
Methods
params/task
MNLI
QQP
QNLI
SST-2
STS-B
MRPC
RTE
CoLA
AVG
Finetuning
28M
85.7
91.1
92.0
92.5
88.8
90.2
75.4
54.9
83.8
Adapters
1.8M
86.3
90.5
93.2
93.0
89.9
90.2
70.3
61.5
84.4
PT
9.6k
85.6
90.6
93.2
93.9
89.9
86.3
67.6
55.3
82.8
LoRAr=8
0.39M
85.8
89.2
93.1
93.2
90.4
89.9
76.3
62.8
85.1
LoRAr=16
0.78M
84.9
89.6
93.0
93.7
90.4
88.7
80.6
63.9
85.6
HyperFomer
638K
85.7
90.0
93.0
94.0
89.7
87.2
75.4
63.7
84.8
Table 2: Performance on GLUE benchmark. For STS-B, we report Pearson correlation coefficients. For CoLA, we report Matthews correlation. For all other tasks, we report Accuracy. The best score , and second best score are red, and orange, respectively. Subscripts denote the standard deviation of the average score over three runs.
Methods
params/task
BoolQ
OBQA
ARC-E
ARC-C
AVG
LoRA
2.1M
74.0
74.0
80.9
63.5
73.1
MultiLoRA
10M
76.5
68.2
81.2
61.9
72.0
MOELoRA
4.5M
73.3
67.8
71.5
57.5
67.5
MoRE
4.5M
74.7
80.5
80.0
64.5
74.9
EPT
3.3M
76.1
78.4
81.4
66.2
75.5
Table 3: Accuracy of all methods on Commonsense Reasoning tasks. The backbone is Llama2-7B.
Figure 2: We present a visualization of the dataset analysis. Figure (a) shows the activation of each expert during the GLUE benchmark testing. Figure (b) displays the task embeddings from the final layer of the self-attention module.
Methods
MNLI
QQP
QNLI
SST-2
STS-B
MRPC
RTE
CoLA
AVG
EPT-2
86.0
90.4
93.2
94.8
90.2
90.2
83.5
63.7
86.5
EPT-4
86.1
90.4
93.2
94.4
89.8
88.2
82.0
65.7
86.2
EPT-6
85.9
90.3
93.4
93.7
90.3
90.7
74.8
68.0
85.9
EPT-8
86.2
90.4
93.5
94.3
90.4
89.2
79.1
67.6
86.3
EPT-2468
86.4
90.2
93.6
94.5
90.0
90.7
82.0
68.9
87.0
Table 4: Ablation Experiment Results. We conduct ablation experiments on initialization methods (AB init), Top-K, and the Adaptive LoRA Pruner (ALP) modules.
AB init
Top-K
ALP
MNLI
QQP
QNLI
SST-2
STS-B
MRPC
RTE
CoLA
AVG
✗
✗
✗
85.5
90.0
92.7
93.7
89.0
90.2
81.3
65.7
86.0
✗
✗
✓
85.6
90.2
93.1
93.9
89.9
90.7
77.7
68.7
86.2
✓
✗
✓
86.3
90.4
93.2
94.3
90.2
88.7
80.6
68.1
86.5
✓
✓
✗
86.1
90.0
93.5
93.9
90.4
88.7
82.0
65.2
86.2
✗
✓
✓
86.2
90.2
93.4
94.8
90.3
90.2
79.1
69.4
86.7
✓
✓
✓
86.4
90.2
93.6
94.5
90.0
90.7
82.0
68.9
87.0
Table 5: Ablation Experiment Results. We conduct ablation experiments on initialization methods (AB init), Top-K, and the Adaptive LoRA Pruner (ALP) modules.
Appendix figures & tables3 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Dataset
Metric
#Train
#Valid
#Test
#Label
CoLA
Mcc
8.5k
1,043
1,063
2
SST-2
Acc
67k
872
1.8k
2
MRPC
Acc
3.7k
408
1.7k
2
QQP
Acc/F1
364k
40.4k
391k
2
STS-B
Corr
5.7k
1.5k
1.4k
1
MNLI
Acc(m/mm)
393k
20k
20k
3
Appendix
Table 6: Dataset Sizes and Evaluation Metrics in the GLUE Benchmark. "Mcc," "Acc," "F1," and "Corr" denote the Matthews correlation coefficient, accuracy, F1 score, and Pearson correlation coefficient, respectively. "Acc(m/mm)" indicates accuracy results for matched and mismatched datasets within MNLI.
Dataset
Metric
#Train
#Valid
#Test
#Label
BoolQ
Acc
9.4k
3.3k
3.2k
2
OBQA
Acc
4.9k
500
500
4
ARC-E
Acc
2.2k
570
2.4k
4
ARC-C
Acc
1.1k
299
1.2k
4
Appendix
Table 7: Dataset Sizes and Evaluation Metrics in the commonsense question-answering datasets, where BoolQ is a binary classification (yes/no) task, while OBQA and ARC are multiple-choice questions. ARC is divided into two subsets: Easy (ARC-E) and Challenge (ARC-C).
Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) under constrained computational budgets. However, standard PEFT methods often struggle in multi-task fine-tuning settings, where diverse optimization objectives induce task interference and limited parameter budgets lead to representational deficiency. While recent approaches incorporate mixture-of-experts (MoE) to alleviate these issues, they predominantly operate in the spatial domain, which may introduce structural redundancy and parameter overhead. To overcome these limitations, we reformulate adaptation in the spectral domain. Our spectral analysis reveals that different tasks exhibit distinct frequency energy distributions, and that LLM layers display heterogeneous frequency sensitivities. Motivated by these insights, we propose FourierMoE, which integrates the MoE architecture with the inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) for frequency-aware adaptation. Specifically, FourierMoE employs a frequency-adaptive router to dispatch tokens to experts specialized in distinct frequency bands. Each expert learns a set of conjugate-symmetric complex coefficients, preserving complete phase and amplitude information while theoretically guaranteeing lossless IDFT reconstruction into real-valued spatial weights. Extensive evaluations across 28 benchmarks, multiple model architectures, and scales demonstrate that FourierMoE consistently outperforms competitive baselines in both single-task and multi-task settings while using significantly fewer trainable parameters. These results highlight the promise of spectral-domain expert adaptation as an effective and parameter-efficient paradigm for LLM fine-tuning.
Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Hong Qi +2
The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) has become a prominent paradigm for scaling Large Language Models (LLMs). Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, such as LoRA, are widely adopted to adapt pretrained MoE LLMs to downstream tasks. However, existing approaches typically assign identical LoRA ranks to all expert modules, ignoring the heterogeneous specialization of pretrained experts. This uniform allocation leads to a resource mismatch: task-relevant experts are under-provisioned, while less relevant ones receive redundant parameters. To address this, we propose DR-LoRA, a Dynamic Rank LoRA framework for fine-tuning pretrained MoE models. Specifically, DR-LoRA initializes all expert LoRA modules with a small active rank and uses an expert saliency score, which combines routing frequency and gradient-based rank importance, to identify which experts would benefit most from additional capacity. It then periodically expands the active ranks of the task-critical expert LoRA, progressively constructing a heterogeneous rank distribution tailored to the target task. Experiments on three MoE models across six tasks show that DR-LoRA consistently outperforms LoRA and other strong baselines, demonstrating that task-adaptive heterogeneous rank allocation is an effective strategy to improve active capacity utilization in MoE fine-tuning.
Guanzhi Deng, Bo Li, Ronghao Chen +5
City University of Hong Kong · Tsinghua University · Peking University +2
Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) is essential for adapting Large Language Models (LLMs) to multi-task scenarios. A prevailing trend in this field involves complex LoRA variants with multiple adapters or heads, which rely on the premise that architectural isolation of task-specific knowledge is necessary. However, this design often introduces dynamic routing, preventing weight merging and causing significant inference latency. In this work, we present a direct challenge to this paradigm. We first reveal a paradox where a simplified, router-free multi-head model with high inter-head redundancy outperforms complex, diversity-driven baselines. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a unified, single-adapter LoRA with increased rank achieves highly competitive performance, questioning the necessity of multi-component structures. Based on these findings, we propose Align-LoRA, a unified and efficient framework that shifts the focus from architectural isolation to representation alignment. Align-LoRA incorporates an explicit alignment loss to encourage the learning of task-shared representations within a shared latent space. Crucially, our method maintains the standard LoRA architecture, ensuring zero inference latency via weight merging. Theoretical analysis and extensive experiments confirm that Align-LoRA significantly surpasses prevailing approaches, establishing a simpler, more effective, and production-friendly paradigm for multi-task PEFT. The code is available at https://github.com/jinda-liu/Align-LoRA.
Jinda Liu, Yi Chang, Yuan Wu
School of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University · 2Southern University of Science and Technology · 3International Center of Future Science, Jilin University +1