FIND: A Simple yet Effective Baseline for Diffusion-Generated Image Detection

Jie Li; Yingying Feng; Chi Xie; Jie Hu; Lei Tan; Jiayi Ji

cs.CVMar 15, 2026

FIND: A Simple yet Effective Baseline for Diffusion-Generated Image Detection

Authors: Jie Li, Yingying Feng, Chi Xie, Jie Hu, Lei Tan, Jiayi Ji

Organizations: Xiamen University · Northeastern University · Tongji University · National University of Singapore

Abstract

The remarkable realism of images generated by diffusion models poses critical detection challenges. Current methods utilize reconstruction error as a discriminative feature, exploiting the observation that real images exhibit higher reconstruction errors when processed through diffusion models. However, these approaches require costly reconstruction computations and depend on specific diffusion models, making their performance highly model-dependent. We identify a fundamental difference: real images are more difficult to fit with Gaussian distributions compared to synthetic ones. In this paper, we propose Forgery Identification via Noise Disturbance (FIND), a novel method that requires only a simple binary classifier. It eliminates reconstruction by directly targeting the core distributional difference between real and synthetic images. Our key operation is to add Gaussian noise to real images during training and label these noisy versions as synthetic. This step allows the classifier to focus on the statistical patterns that distinguish real from synthetic images. We theoretically prove that the noise-augmented real images resemble diffusion-generated images in their ease of Gaussian fitting. Furthermore, simply by adding noise, they still retain visual similarity to the original images, highlighting the most discriminative distribution-related features. The proposed FIND improves performance by 11.7% on the GenImage benchmark while running 126x faster than existing methods. By removing the need for auxiliary diffusion models and reconstruction, it offers a practical, efficient, and generalizable way to detect diffusion-generated content.

Figures & tables

Figure 1: Comparison between FIND and previous noise-based methods. (a) DIRE utilizes complete reconstruction by adding noise and then denoising it with a Diffusion Model (DM) in multiple steps; (b) LaRE 2 compresses the noise addition and denoising steps into a single step within the latent space; (c) Our method only involves adding noise without the denoising process. Compared with previous methods, FIND avoids explicit reconstruction and omits the dependence on DM.

Figure 4: Cross-validation results across different training and testing subsets. We report the accuracy for DIRE, LaRE 2 and Ours on all 8 generators, where each row represents a corresponding training subset. Our method shows consistent and superior performance on different training sets and test sets.

Method	Backbone	Test diffusion generators								Average
Method	Backbone	Midjourney	SD V1.4	SD V1.5	ADM	GLIDE	Wukong	VQDM	BigGAN	Average
CNNSpot ( Wang et al. 2020 )	RN50	58.20	70.30	70.20	57.00	57.10	67.70	56.70	56.60	61.73
Spec ( Zhang et al. 2019 )	RN50	56.70	72.40	72.30	57.90	65.40	70.30	61.70	64.30	65.13
F3Net ( Qian et al. 2020 )	RN50	55.10	73.10	73.10	66.50	57.80	72.30	62.10	56.50	64.56
GramNet ( Liu et al. 2020 )	RN50	58.10	72.80	72.70	58.70	65.30	71.30	57.80	61.20	64.74
DIRE ( Wang et al. 2023 )	RN50	65.00	73.73	73.69	61.85	69.16	74.33	63.43	56.74	67.24

Table 1: Comparison of the accuracy of our method with existing methods. Each row in the table shows the average test accuracy of the corresponding method, calculated when trained on 8 subsets and tested on the respective test set. The last column gives the overall average accuracy. The symbol †indicates our reproduction from its source code on a CLIP-ViT-B/16 version. The proposed FIND outperforms the SOTAs on both RN50 and ViT-B/16 backbones.

Method	Time per image (ms)			FPS
Method	Rec	Cls	Total	FPS
DIRE	151.6	0.3	151.9	6.6
LaRE 2	50.0	0.4	50.4	19.8
Ours	0.0	0.4	0.4	2500.0

Table 2: Average inference time of different methods. Without reconstruction, our method is significantly faster.

	N	R w/ N	S w/ N	Midjourney	SD V1.4	SD V1.5	ADM	GLIDE	Wukong	VQDM	BigGAN	Average
1				73.97	83.59	83.54	76.35	91.45	80.78	83.62	71.30	80.58
2	$\checkmark$			66.66	78.74	79.00	73.59	79.83	75.82	82.43	71.66	75.97
3	$\checkmark$	$\checkmark$		76.03	87.62	87.70	86.11	95.03	83.96	89.58	79.75	85.72
4			$\checkmark$	64.23	79.29	79.40	71.18	76.98	76.09	82.12	70.45	74.97
5		$\checkmark$	$\checkmark$	75.23	86.10	86.31	85.48	96.74	82.99	87.52	75.61	84.50
6		$\checkmark$		82.89	89.69	89.77	87.42	97.82	87.04	89.25	82.96	88.35

Table 3: Impact of different kinds of noise. N: using Gaussian noise as images; R w/ N: adding Gaussian noise to real images; S w/ N: adding Gaussian noise to synthetic images. The R w/ N plays a dominant role, consistent with our hypothesis.

Panel of Figure 5 — Figure 5: The impact of $\epsilon$ . The accuracy surges as $\epsilon$ rises initially and starts fluctuating when $\epsilon$ exceeds 20. The quality of the images deteriorates rapidly as $\epsilon$ increases. We pick a balanced value of $\epsilon=50$ .

Explore similar work

Feb 27, 2026

A Difference-in-Difference Approach to Detecting AI-Generated Images

Diffusion models are able to produce AI-generated images that are almost indistinguishable from real ones. This raises concerns about their potential misuse and poses substantial challenges for detecting them. Many existing detectors rely on reconstruction error -- the difference between the input image and its reconstructed version -- as the basis for distinguishing real from fake images. However, these detectors become less effective as modern AI-generated images become increasingly similar to real ones. To address this challenge, we propose a novel difference-in-difference method. Instead of directly using the reconstruction error (a first-order difference), we compute the difference in reconstruction error -- a second-order difference -- for variance reduction and improving detection accuracy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves strong generalization performance, enabling reliable detection of AI-generated images in the era of generative AI.

Xinyi Qi, Kai Ye, Chengchun Shi +3

The London School of Economics and Political Science · University of Birmingham

AI-Generated Image Detection Reconstruction-Based Anomaly Detection

Ask PDF

Apr 10, 2026

Detecting Diffusion-generated Images via Dynamic Assembly Forests

Diffusion models are known for generating high-quality images, causing serious security concerns. To combat this, most efforts rely on deep neural networks (e.g., CNNs and Transformers), while largely overlooking the potential of traditional machine learning models. In this paper, we freshly investigate such alternatives and proposes a novel Dynamic Assembly Forest model (DAF) to detect diffusion-generated images. Built upon the deep forest paradigm, DAF addresses the inherent limitations in feature learning and scalable training, making it an effective diffusion-generated image detector. Compared to existing DNN-based methods, DAF has significantly fewer parameters, much lower computational cost, and can be deployed without GPUs, while achieving competitive performance under standard evaluation protocols. These results highlight the strong potential of the proposed method as a practical substitute for heavyweight DNN models in resource-constrained scenarios. Our code and models are available at https://github.com/OUC-VAS/DAF.

Mengxin Fu, Yuezun Li

School of Computer Science and Technology, Ocean University of China

AI-Generated Image Detection Diffusion Models

Ask PDF

Sep 24, 2026

EIB-Net: Entropy-Guided Information Bottleneck for Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection

The proliferation of photorealistic AI-generated images demands robust detection methods that generalize across diverse generative models. While existing approaches target manipulation-based forgeries with local artifacts, generation-based images (e.g., from diffusion models) lack such traces, posing a fundamental challenge. We observe that generative models prioritize global semantics at the expense of local texture fidelity, making low-texture regions key indicators of synthetic origin. To exploit this, we propose EIB-Net, an Entropy-guided Information Bottleneck Network. EIB-Net introduces a novel Image Entropy (IE) metric to automatically select the most informative (lowest-entropy) patch, then processes it with a Variational Information Bottleneck (VIB) to learn compact, generalizable features. Extensive experiments on DIFF, DiffusionForensics, and GenImage benchmarks demonstrate state-of-the-art performance: EIB-Net achieves 85.7% accuracy using only 2% of training data, outperforming full-image baselines by over 15%, and maintains robust cross-generator generalization (83.5% average accuracy on GenImage). Furthermore, our entropy-guided patch selection (EGPL) consistently enhances diverse backbones (CNNs and Transformers), proving its practical value for data-efficient detection.

Zhida Zhang, Xinlei Ma, Jie Cao

School of Artificial Intelligence, UCAS & NLPR, CASIA Beijing, China · School of Advanced Interdisciplinary Sciences, UCAS & NLPR, CASIA Beijing, China · NLPR, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing, China

AI-Generated Image Detection Variational Information Bottleneck

Ask PDF