The rapid advancement of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) has enabled browsing agents to acquire and reason over multimodal information in the real world. But existing benchmarks suffer from two limitations: insufficient evaluation of visual reasoning ability and the neglect of native visual information of web pages in the reasoning chains. To address these challenges, we introduce a new benchmark for visual-native search, VisBrowse-Bench. It contains 169 VQA instances covering multiple domains and evaluates the models' visual reasoning capabilities during the search process through multimodal evidence cross-validation via text-image retrieval and joint reasoning. These data were constructed by human experts using a multi-stage pipeline and underwent rigorous manual verification. We additionally propose an agent workflow that can effectively drive the browsing agent to actively collect and reason over visual information during the search process. We comprehensively evaluated both open-source and closed-source models in this workflow. Experimental results show that even the best-performing model, Claude-4.6-Opus only achieves an accuracy of 47.6%, while the proprietary Deep Research model, o3-deep-research only achieves an accuracy of 41.1%. The code and data can be accessed at: https://github.com/ZhengboZhang/VisBrowse-Bench
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Existing benchmarks have two limitations in evaluating multimodal browsing agents: 1. the semantic information of visual queries can be easily obtained through image search tools; 2. real-world browsing environments contain a wealth of multimodal information, which most benchmarks overlook. VisBrowse-Bench is designed to fuse multimodal information during the search process and ensure that visual capabilities are essential for completing the task.
Figure 2: (a) Overall performance of MLLMs on VisBrowse-Bench. (b) Performance of four MLLMs on seven categories.
Figure 3: Overview of the VisBrowse-Bench. This figure shows the example questions and answers across seven categories.
Figure 4: (a) Distribution of categories in VisBrowse-Bench. (b) Summary of statistics.
Benchmarks
Multimodal queries
Multi-turn interaction
Public search information
Expert validation
Thinking with image
Visual evidence
Cross-image reasoning
MMSearch [ 7 ]
✓
✗
✓
✓
✗
✗
✗
BrowseComp-VL [ 8 ]
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
✗
✗
MM-BrowseComp [ 20 ]
✓
✓
✗
✗
✓
✓
✗
MMSearch-Plus [ 9 ]
✓
✓
✗
✗
✓
✗
✗
VDR-Bench [ 10 ]
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✗
✗
VisBrowse-Bench (Ours)
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Table 1: Comparison between our benchmark and other multimodal deep search benchmarks.
Model
Method
Overall
Category
Meida
Life
Art
Geography
Techology
Sport
Finance
Closed-source Model
Gemini-3.0-Pro
Direct Answer
23.7
25.9
16.7
28.6
30.4
25.9
16.7
18.8
+ TS
38.5 (+14.8)
44.4
45.8
35.7
39.1
25.9
50.0
25.0
+ IS
40.2 (+1.7)
44.4
45.8
42.9
43.5
48.1
29.2
18.8
Gemini-3.0-Flash
Direct Answer
32.5
29.6
33.3
28.6
34.8
37.0
33.3
31.2
Table 2: Main results of the VisBrowse-Bench across different categories. The evaluation metric is accuracy (%). Each model is evaluated using three methods: Direct answer, + TS and + IS. The green numbers represent performance improvement compared to the previous method, and red numbers represent performance degradation. The bold numbers represent the best accuracy overall or in each category, and underlined numbers represent the second-best accuracy.
Figure 5: The percentage of times each of the five tools was used in four MLLMs: Kimi-K2.5, Gemini-3.0-Pro, Claude-4.6-Opus and GPT-5.2
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in many visual tasks, but they often struggle with factual grounding when confronted with complex, open-world scenarios. While recent multimodal deep search agents attempt to address this issue by utilizing external tools, the visual-native search paradigm remains underexplored. Existing methods primarily rely on simple images with explicit semantics and text-only evidence trajectories, limiting the agent's ability to perform multi-hop, cross-modal reasoning and search. To address these limitations, we propose Visual-Seeker, a visual-native multimodal deep search agent via active visual reasoning. Rather than treating vision as a static input, our agent actively attends to fine-grained visual details, dynamically harvests visual evidence throughout the search process. To unlock its visual-native potential, we design an active visual reasoning data pipeline and synthesize 5K high-quality multimodal trajectories for model training. Extensive experiments demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance across five challenging multimodal search benchmarks, even surpassing several proprietary models, validating robust visual-native reasoning and search in real-world web environments. The code and data can be accessed at: https://github.com/ZhengboZhang/Visual-Seeker.
Zhengbo Zhang, Changtao Miao, Jinbo Su +10
School of Artificial Intelligence, UCAS · Institute of Automation, CAS · Ant Digital Technologies, Ant Group +2
AI agents with advanced reasoning and tool-use capabilities have demonstrated impressive performance in web browsing for deep search. However, existing benchmarks such as BrowseComp primarily focus on textual content, overlooking the prevalence of multimodal content. To bridge this gap, we introduce MM-BrowseComp, a novel benchmark comprising 400 challenging, hand-crafted questions designed to evaluate multimodal retrieval and reasoning capabilities. Unlike prior work, MM-BrowseComp incorporates visual prompts and necessitates the extraction of key evidence from web images and videos to complete questions, rendering text-only approaches insufficient. Additionally, we provide a verified checklist for each question, enabling fine-grained analysis of multimodal dependencies and reasoning paths. Our comprehensive evaluation of 27 state-of-the-art models reveals that even leading models like GPT-5-High with tools achieve only 24.25% accuracy, highlighting the suboptimal multimodal browsing capabilities, establishing MM-BrowseComp as a rigorous new standard for the field.
Shilong Li, Xingyuan Bu, Wenjie Wang +22
1ByteDance · 2Nanjing University · 5Zhejiang University +2
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in visual understanding, yet they remain limited in complex, multi-step reasoning that requires deep searching and integrating visual evidence with external knowledge. In this work, we address this challenge by constructing high-quality, verified multi-hop vision-language training data for multimodal deep-search agents. We propose a Multi-hop Tool-Augmented Agent for Evidence-based QA Synthesis (MTA-Agent), which automatically selects tools and their parameters to retrieve and validate evidence from both visual and textual sources and generates structured multi-hop question-answer trajectories. Starting from diverse VQA seed datasets, our pipeline produces a large-scale training dataset, MTA-Vision-DeepSearch, containing 21K high-quality multi-hop examples. The data is filtered through a multi-stage verification process to ensure factual consistency and answer uniqueness. Using MTA-Vision-DeepSearch, a 32B open-source multimodal search agent achieves state-of-the-art performance, reaching an average of 54.63% across six challenging benchmarks, outperforming GPT-5 (51.86%), Gemini-2.5-Pro (50.98%), and Gemini-3-Pro (54.46%) under the same tool settings. We further show that training on our data improves both reasoning depth and tool-use behavior, increasing the average number of steps from 2.27 to 4.28, and leading to more systematic and persistent search strategies. Additionally, we demonstrate that training can be performed without real-time tool calls by replaying cached interactions, significantly reducing training cost. Importantly, we present MTA-Agent as a fully open recipe for multimodal deep search: we release the entire dataset, training trajectories, and implementation details to enable reproducibility and future research on open multimodal search agents.