Visual-language models (VLMs) excel at data mappings, but real-world document heterogeneity and unstructuredness disrupt the consistency of cross-modal embeddings. Recent late-interaction methods enhance image-text alignment through multi-vector representations, yet traditional training with limited samples and static strategies cannot adapt to the model's dynamic evolution, causing cross-modal retrieval confusion. To overcome this, we introduce Evo-Retriever, a retrieval framework featuring an LLM-guided curriculum evolution built upon a novel Viewpoint-Pathway collaboration. First, we employ multi-view image alignment to enhance fine-grained matching via multi-scale and multi-directional perspectives. Then, a bidirectional contrastive learning strategy generates "hard queries" and establishes complementary learning paths for visual and textual disambiguation to rebalance supervision. Finally, the model-state summary from the above collaboration is fed into an LLM meta-controller, which adaptively adjusts the training curriculum using expert knowledge to promote the model's evolution. On ViDoRe V2 and MMEB (VisDoc), Evo-Retriever achieves state-of-the-art performance, with nDCG@5 scores of 65.2% and 77.1%.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Challenges in complex visual document retrieval: (a) Insufficient Spatial Awareness : Models must extract and integrate dispersed information (e.g., combining "Plastic 12%" and "Metal 8%") from dynamic layouts. (b) Intrinsic Vulnerability to Textual Confusion : Models must identify differentiated needs in obfuscated queries (e.g., franchisee info and corporate chart). (c) Stagnation from a Static Curriculum : The learning effectiveness of the initial negative sample set (e.g., containing only "salary") gradually diminishes under a fixed curriculum.
Figure 2: The motivation behind LLM-guided evolutionary curriculum. (a) A static threshold is effective in the early training stage, providing informative gradient signals. (b) As the model converges, the same threshold captures only trivial negative samples, leading to diminished gradients. (c) Our LLM-guided evolutionary curriculum adjusts the mining interval to continually discover challenging negatives, ensuring sustained optimization.
Figure 3: Evo-Retriever enhances representation via multi-view (Evo. 1) and bidirectional contrast (Evo. 2). Guided by expert knowledge, this Viewpoint-Pathway collaboration dynamically mines hard samples (Evo. 3), enabling continual evolution of the model.
Figure 4: Overview of the proposed LLM-EC.
Model
Size (B)
Avg.
MIT
Economics
ESG Restaurant
ESG Restaurant
Biomedical
Macro
Human
Synthetic
Multilingual
Multilingual
English
Multilingual
llama-nemoretriever-3b-v1
4.4
63.5
64.3
55.9
75.4
58.6
llama-nemoretriever-1b-v1
2.4
62.1
62.9
53.2
76.4
55.9
colnomic-embed-multimodal-7b
7.0
60.8
63.4
56.2
68.7
54.8
colqwen2.5-v0.2
3.0
59.3
59.2
53.3
66.4
58.3
Table 1: Performance comparison on the ViDoRe V2 benchmark. All scores are nDCG@5 (%). Bold and underlined numbers denote the 1st and 2nd scores, respectively. Our models achieve SOTA performance, especially on challenging multilingual subsets.
Model
Size (B)
Avg.
ViDoRe V1
ViDoRe V2
VisRAG
VisDoc-OOD
gme-Qwen2-VL-7B-Instruct
8.3
75.18
89.44
55.61
84.99
44.40
Seed-1.6-embedding
-
73.44
85.53
56.57
84.74
43.14
gme-Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct
2.2
72.71
86.15
53.96
82.52
43.12
colpali-v1.3
2.9
70.97
83.60
51.98
81.13
43.12
Ops-MM-embedding-v1-7B
8.3
70.34
80.05
59.59
79.32
43.34
Ops-MM-embedding-v1-2B
2.2
66.96
76.39
53.18
77.64
41.17
Table 2: Performance comparison on the MMEB (VisDoc) benchmark. All scores are nDCG@linear 5 (%). Bold and underlined numbers denote the 1st and 2nd scores, respectively. Our models demonstrate superior generalization and robustness across a wide range of document understanding tasks.
ID
Configuration
nDCG@5
(a)
Baseline ( Net0 )
61.17
— Multi-view Alignment —
(b)
Downsample-only
59.75
(c)
Stitched-only
58.59
(d)
+ MVA ( Net1 )
62.25
— Bidirectional Learning —
Table 3: Ablation study on ViDoRe V2 (3B model). Bold numbers denote the best scores.
Factor
Setting
nDCG@5
1. Exploration Phase
Enabled (default, 60 steps)
63.05
Disabled
61.86
2. Difficulty Granularity
10 Intervals (Coarse)
62.89
16 Intervals (Default)
63.05
Table 4: Analysis of key design choices for LLM-EC, showing deviations from the default setting. Bold numbers denote the best scores.
Figure 5: Impact of Temperature τ on the Normalized Gradient Profile. The plot shows the normalized gradient, σ(Δs/τ) , as a function of the similarity gap Δs . A lower τ (e.g., our setting of 0.02, red line) creates a much steeper and narrower transition zone where gradients become substantial. This highlights the need for a curriculum that can precisely target negatives within this narrow “sweet spot” to ensure efficient learning.
Action ID
Difficulty Range
Low-Signal Zone
A
[0.70,0.85]
B
[0.70,0.90]
C
[0.70,0.92]
D
[0.75,0.90]
Effective-Learning Zone
Table 5: The action space of M=16 overlapping sampling policies.
τ
nDCG@5
1.0
57.37
0.02 (Ours)
63.05
Table 6: Ablation on the temperature τ in the margin loss on ViDoRe V2 (3B model). All scores are nDCG@5 (%). Bold numbers denote the best score.
Partitioning Strategy
nDCG@5
Uniform + Overlap
61.89
Non-uniform + Overlap (Ours)
63.05
Table 7: Effect of interval density on ViDoRe V2 (3B model). All scores are nDCG@5 (%). Bold marks the best result.
Transition steps
Lock-in steps
nDCG@5
50
50
62.18
200 (Ours)
200 (Ours)
63.05
Table 8: Ablation on Transition and Lock-in phase lengths for LLM-EC (3B, ViDoRe V2). All scores are nDCG@5 (%). Bold numbers denote the best score.
Configuration
nDCG@5
baseline (Net0)
64.03
Fixed Window 80–98%
64.32
Linear Curriculum
64.29
Rule-based Oracle
64.36
LLM-EC (Ours)
65.20
Table 9: Curriculum ablation on Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct. All scores are nDCG@5 (%). Bold numbers denote the best score.
Scheduler
Default
Perturbed
Drop
Rule-based Oracle
62.81
61.75
−1.06
LLM-EC (Ours)
63.05
62.40
−0.65
Table 10: Robustness to threshold perturbations on ViDoRe V2 (Evo-Retriever-3B). In the Lock-in phase, thresholds in the Upgrade and Downgrade Conditions are perturbed: Lend<0.3→0.36 , relative loss reduction for upgrade 50%→60% , and relative loss increase for downgrade 30%→25.5% . Drop = Default − Perturbed. All scores are nDCG@5 (%).
Figure 6: Curriculum trajectories during training for Evo-Retriever-3B. Thick lines indicate the selected difficulty interval, while thin lines show the hard-negative loss. The rule-based oracle follows monotonic threshold-triggered jumps, whereas LLM-EC adapts difficulty according to training dynamics and performs rollback when instability is detected.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently been applied to universal multimodal retrieval, where Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning improves candidate reranking. However, existing approaches remain largely language-driven, relying on static visual encodings and lacking the ability to actively verify fine-grained visual evidence, which often leads to speculative reasoning in visually ambiguous cases. We propose V-Retrver, an evidence-driven retrieval framework that reformulates multimodal retrieval as an agentic reasoning process grounded in visual inspection. V-Retrver enables an MLLM to selectively acquire visual evidence during reasoning via external visual tools, performing a multimodal interleaved reasoning process that alternates between hypothesis generation and targeted visual verification.To train such an evidence-gathering retrieval agent, we adopt a curriculum-based learning strategy combining supervised reasoning activation, rejection-based refinement, and reinforcement learning with an evidence-aligned objective. Experiments across multiple multimodal retrieval benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements in retrieval accuracy (with 23.0% improvements on average), perception-driven reasoning reliability, and generalization.
Dongyang Chen, Chaoyang Wang, Dezhao Su +6
Tsinghua University · University of Central Florida · Fudan University +4
With the rapid proliferation of multimodal information, Visual Document Retrieval (VDR) has emerged as a critical frontier in bridging the gap between unstructured visually rich data and precise information acquisition. Unlike traditional natural image retrieval, visual documents exhibit unique characteristics defined by dense textual content, intricate layouts, and fine-grained semantic dependencies. This paper surveys the VDR landscape as a retrieval problem in its own right, rather than as the front end of a generation pipeline, and does so specifically through the lens of the Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) era. We begin by examining the benchmark landscape, including the recent turn toward reasoning-intensive evaluation, and then dive into the methodological evolution along two orthogonal axes: what a retriever is, spanning multimodal embedding models and reranker models, and how it is deployed, from single-stage retrieval through Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to Agentic systems. Cutting across both, we analyse the representation--efficiency trade-off that late interaction imposes. We ground these categories in leaderboard evidence on where the empirical frontier actually lies, and close by identifying persistent challenges and outlining promising future directions for multimodal document intelligence.
Yibo Yan, Jiahao Huo, Guanbo Feng +12
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Alibaba Cloud Computing · Hong Kong University of Science and Technology +1
Visual document retrieval is a critical component of multimodal retrieval-augmented generation, aiming to identify query-relevant pages from document collections where evidence is distributed across text, layout, charts, and visual structures. Recent efforts toward finer-grained supervision primarily rely on textual descriptions or localized visual regions as evidence proxies. However, such supervision signals may either overlook complex visual structures or provide incomplete and inaccurate representations of the underlying evidence. To address these limitations, we propose ConceptFormer, a latent concept representation learning framework for visual document retrieval. ConceptFormer models query-relevant evidence as continuous, query-conditioned latent concepts that explicitly bridge localized visual evidence and semantic relevance, without requiring either textual intermediate representations or direct reliance on raw visual annotations. During training, ConceptFormer employs a strong vision-language model to dynamically determine the number of latent concept tokens and uses these concepts as an intermediate representation to bridge the semantic gap between queries and documents, thereby guiding the learning of the embedding space. Experiments on diverse visual document retrieval benchmarks demonstrate that ConceptFormer achieves 16.7% and 22.1% relative improvements in average NDCG@10 over the strongest visual retrieval baseline and the strongest OCR-based text retrieval baseline, respectively. Further analysis reveals that latent concepts effectively connect localized visual evidence with semantic relevance, enabling the retriever to capture both fine-grained textual cues and complex document-level visual structures while preserving strong retrieval alignment. Codes and data are available at https://github.com/Neuir/ConceptFormer.
Chunyi Peng, Zhipeng Xu, Yukun Yan +9
Northeastern University Shenyang, China · Tsinghua University Beijing, China · Peking University Beijing, China