Adversarial attacks against Modern Vision-Language Models
Organizations: Duke University
Abstract
We study adversarial robustness of open-source vision-language model (VLM) agents deployed in a self-contained e-commerce environment built to simulate realistic pre-deployment conditions. We evaluate two agents, LLaVA-v1.5-7B and Qwen2.5-VL-7B, under three gradient-based attacks: the Basic Iterative Method (BIM), Projected Gradient Descent (PGD), and a CLIP-based spectral attack. Against LLaVA, all three attacks achieve substantial attack success rates (52.6%, 53.8%, and 66.9% respectively), demonstrating that simple gradient-based methods pose a practical threat to open-source VLM agents. Qwen2.5-VL proves significantly more robust across all attacks (6.5%, 7.7%, and 15.5%), suggesting meaningful architectural differences in adversarial resilience between open-source VLM families. These findings have direct implications for the security evaluation of VLM agents prior to commercial deployment.
Figures & tables
| Method | LLaVA-v1.5-7B | Qwen2.5-VL-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Clean Baseline | 90.2 2.3 | 98.3 1.0 |
| BIM | 47.4 3.9 (ASR 52.6) | 93.5 1.9 (ASR 6.5) |
| PGD | 46.2 3.9 (ASR 53.8) | 92.3 2.1 (ASR 7.7) |
| CLIP Spectral | 33.1 3.7 (ASR 66.9) | 84.5 2.8 (ASR 15.5) |
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Adversarial Attacks on VLMs
Adversarial attacks on vision-language models exploit images, text, and multimodal interactions to manipulate outputs, bypass safety, or degrade reliability.
See all 179 papers