Federated Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Distributional Critic Regularization
Authors: David Millard, Cecilia Alm, Rashid Ali, Pengcheng Shi, Ali Baheri
Organizations: Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA · Dept. of Psychology and School of Information, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA · Department of Engineering Science, University West, Trollhättan 461 30, Sweden · Golisano College of Computing and Information Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA
Federated reinforcement learning typically aggregates value functions or policies by parameter averaging, which emphasizes expected return and can obscure statistical multimodality and tail behavior that matter in safety-critical settings. We formalize federated distributional reinforcement learning (FedDistRL), where clients parametrize quantile value function critics and federate these networks only. We also propose TR-FedDistRL, which builds a per client, risk-aware Wasserstein barycenter over a temporal buffer. This local barycenter provides a reference region to constrain the parameter averaged critic, ensuring necessary distributional information is not averaged out during the federation process. The distributional trust region is implemented as a shrink-squash step around this reference. Under fixed-policy evaluation, the feasibility map is nonexpansive and the update is contractive in a probe-set Wasserstein metric under evaluation. Experiments on a bandit, multi-agent gridworld, and continuous highway environment show reduced mean-smearing, improved safety proxies (catastrophe/accident rate), and lower critic/policy drift versus mean-oriented and non-federated baselines.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Each panel shows how aggregation operators combine scalar, multimodal client reward distributions in the bandit setting (i.e., Zπ=rt , γ=0 ). Each client is parameterized with QR-DQN models and averaging is computed via Equation 9 . Left: critic parameter averaging ( FedAvg ) induces an output-space arithmetic averaging effect that can smear modes and attenuate tail mass (mean-smearing). Middle: an unweighted Wasserstein-1 barycenter aggregates in distribution space and better preserves geometric structure (modes/tails) compared with arithmetic averaging. Right: a CVaR-risk-weighted Wasserstein-1 barycenter biases the barycenter toward lower-tail behavior by upweighting clients with larger lower-tail risk (CVaR at level α=0.1 ), helping retain tail-relevant mass while still preserving multimodality.
Fig. 2: Case Study 2 client environments for Clients 1–3. Each panel shows one client’s environment with obstacles, hazard zone, agent start/goal locations, and object start/goal locations. The three client environments are arranged for direct side-by-side comparison of environmental heterogeneity. All instantiations use a 10×10 grid with 3 agents and 3 objects.
Method
Return ↑
Output Drift ↓
Catastrophe ↓
Local
483.09 ± 128.40
113.37 ± 27.94
0.0323 ± 0.0076
FedAvg
554.76 ± 95.51
159.71 ± 18.56
0.0240 ± 0.0054
FedAvg (CVaR)
544.56 ± 74.24
151.51 ± 17.09
0.0203 ± 0.0037
FedAvg (CVaR + TR)
436.21 ± 54.13
98.07 ± 11.77
0.0172 ± 0.0032
TABLE I: Results are mean ± standard deviation over 30 random seeds. Return is the average episodic return (higher is better). Output Drift quantifies across-round instability of the distributional critic outputs on a fixed evaluation/probe set (lower means the critic’s predicted return laws change less from round to round and are less perturbed by federation). Catastrophe is the evaluation catastrophe rate (fraction of episodes ending in a catastrophic event; lower is better).
Fig. 3: Bars report the percent change in catastrophe rate for each heterogeneous client relative to the Local baseline (baseline corresponds to 0% by definition), aggregated over 30 random seeds; negative values indicate fewer catastrophes (safer) than Local . Catastrophe rate is the fraction of evaluation episodes that terminate in a designated catastrophic event (environment-defined unsafe terminal condition). Error bars denote variability across seeds (standard deviation).
Fig. 4: Accident rate across training steps for each heterogeneous client in the highway environment (Case Study 3), comparing Local , FedAvg , FedAvg (CVaR) , and FedAvg (CVaR + TR) over 30 random seeds. Shaded regions denote standard deviation across seeds. Lower accident rate indicates safer behavior. FedAvg (CVaR + TR) consistently achieves the lowest accident rate across clients, demonstrating that the proposed risk-aware trust-region regularization improves safety in a continuous-control setting under environment heterogeneity.
Method
Return ↑
Accident ↓
Local
23.197 ± 4.830
0.811 ± 0.063
FedAvg
27.797 ± 4.219
0.736 ± 0.068
FedAvg (CVaR)
30.168 ± 3.996
0.678 ± 0.066
FedAvg (CVaR + TR)
31.231 ± 3.943
0.653 ± 0.066
TABLE II: Results are mean ± standard deviation over 30 random seeds. Return is the average episodic return (higher is better). Accident is the evaluation accident rate (fraction of episodes with at least one collision/accident event; lower is better). Methods mirror Case Study 2.
Federated Reinforcement Learning (FRL) enables collaborative policy learning across distributed agents with heterogeneous environments. While recent methods based on variance reduction, divergence penalization, and momentum optimization improve FRL under heterogeneous settings, they still primarily synchronize policy or value-network parameters and do not explicitly address distributional mismatch among heterogeneous clients. Therefore, we propose FedGuide, a FRL framework that uses diffusion priors as behavior models to provide personalized data supported distributions for heterogeneous local policy learning. Instead of directly averaging local policies, FedGuide aggregates those diffusion priors through Optimal-Transport Mixture-of-Experts (OT-MoE), preserving heterogeneous behavior modes in distribution space. It further develops a Distribution Correction Estimation (DICE) value baseline to provide low-variance, return-aware guidance for local policy improvement. Experiments across heterogeneous environments show that FedGuide outperforms representative FRL methods in client-average returns, final-round performance, and worst-round robustness, while maintaining stable learning under stronger heterogeneity.
Federated Reinforcement Learning (FedRL) enables coordination of distributed energy resources without sharing raw local data, but standard aggregation methods such as FedAvg do not account for system-level constraints, often leading to unsafe global behavior. In this work, we study constraint-aware aggregation for federated reinforcement learning in distributed energy coordination. We propose aggregation rules that incorporate both local performance and estimated constraint violation into the server-side update. Among these, a simple penalty-based rule, wi∝Ri−αVi, consistently provides the most reliable trade-off between reward and safety, without requiring dual optimization or modifications to local training. \textcolor{black}{We evaluate our approach on DairyGridEnv, a benchmark modeling multiple farms coordinating battery storage under stochastic demand and a shared grid capacity constraint, and further assess robustness using real load-driven demand profiles from Finland and the German FIELD dataset. Across multiple seeds, penalty-based aggregation substantially reduces violations while improving reward relative to FedAvg in both synthetic and real load-driven settings.} A combined reward-violation scheme exposes a tunable trade-off via λ, but is less stable. These results demonstrate that lightweight aggregation strategies can substantially improve empirical safety in federated reinforcement learning while preserving standard communication protocols.
Usman Haider, Karl Mason
School of Computer Science, University of Galway, Ireland.
We study federated reinforcement learning in which multiple agents interact with a common Markov decision process and communicate through a central server to collaboratively learn the optimal state-action value function. Our goal is to understand whether the sample-efficiency benefits of collaboration can be retained when a fraction of the agents behave adversarially and transmit arbitrarily corrupted information. To address this problem, we introduce Robust Async-Fed-Q, an epoch-based federated learning algorithm that combines variance-reduced estimation of the Bellman optimality operator at the agents with robust aggregation at the server. We establish high-probability finite-time guarantees showing that the proposed method preserves the statistical gains of collaboration among the honest agents while tolerating adversarial corruption. In particular, the effect of the adversarial agents decreases as the amount of data collected by each honest agent grows and eventually vanishes in the infinite-sample limit. We complement these guarantees with information-theoretic lower bounds that characterize the unavoidable statistical cost of adversarial corruption, leading to the first nearly matching upper and lower bounds for adversarially robust federated reinforcement learning. We further extend our framework to accommodate single-trajectory Markovian sampling and heterogeneous partial coverage, where different agents may explore different regions of the state-action space and learning relies on their collective coverage. Finally, our epoch-based design substantially improves the best known communication complexity for federated Q-learning under asynchronous sampling.
Sreejeet Maity, Aritra Mitra
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering North Carolina State University, Raleigh