cs.AIMar 18, 2026

Adaptive Domain Models: Bayesian Evolution, Warm Rotation, and Principled Training for Geometric and Neuromorphic AI

Authors: Houston Haynes

Organizations: Braidpoint, Asheville, NC

Abstract

Transformer-based large language models have become a prominent focus of machine learning. We develop adaptive domain models to supply domain-specific predictions and checks within language-model pipelines, as well as to serve direct machine automation efficiently. Their predictions can inform generation, while declared constraints and error bounds support checks on the calculations underlying proposed responses and actions. These feedforward and feedback paths aim to reduce domain errors while supporting use cases such as constraint solving for machine processes as well as preserving accuracy in a language model's conversational setting. Physical dimensions and geometric support restrict admissible computation, while a probability model expresses uncertainty. Our type and program hypergraph work connects these relationships to numerical and deployment obligations. We derive a natural-gradient calculation over forward tangent directions using a declared program metric, with a calibration example and a bound separating metric, derivative and solve errors. Forward differentiation and posit accumulation expose complementary resource and error tradeoffs. Our worked linear-Gaussian update connects posterior computation to error and a distribution-shift decision. Recent results from Urschel bound elimination growth probabilistically under distinct Gaussian-input and random-preconditioning hypotheses. Our unique approach to warm rotation binds candidate parameters to their numerical evidence and destination while each request observes a coherent model and state. We propose Bayesian distillation as a source of prior information. Our architecture offers a route to domain computations with explicit guarantees that can guide automated decisions and model responses. We specify experiments to evaluate prediction quality, domain errors across conversational turns, and total resource cost.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Mar 20, 2026

Thinking in Different Spaces: Domain-Specific Latent Geometry Survives Cross-Architecture Translation

We investigate whether independently trained language models converge to geometrically compatible latent representations, and whether this compatibility can be exploited to correct model behavior at inference time without any weight updates. We learn a linear projection matrix that maps activation vectors from a large teacher model into the coordinate system of a smaller student model, then intervene on the student's residual stream during generation by substituting its internal state with the translated teacher representation. Across a fully crossed experimental matrix of 20 heterogeneous teacher-student pairings spanning mixture-of-experts, dense, code-specialized, and synthetically trained architectures, the Ridge projection consistently achieves R^2 = 0.50 on verbal reasoning and R^2 = 0.40 on mathematical reasoning, collapsing to R^2 = -0.22 under permutation control and R^2 = 0.01 under L_1 regularization. Behavioral correction rates range from 14.0% to 50.0% on TruthfulQA (mean 25.2%) and from 8.5% to 43.3% on GSM8K arithmetic reasoning (mean 25.5%), demonstrating that the method generalizes across fundamentally different reasoning domains. We report a near-zero correlation between geometric alignment quality and behavioral correction rate (r = -0.07), revealing a dissociation between representation space fidelity and output space impact. Intervention strength is architecture-specific: student models exhibit characteristic sensitivity profiles that invert across domains, with the most steerable verbal student becoming the least steerable mathematical student. Finally, a double dissociation experiment conducted across all 20 model pairings confirms without exception that projection matrices collapse catastrophically when transferred across reasoning domains (mean R^2 = -3.83 in both transfer directions), establishing domain-specific subspace geometry as a universal property of LMs.
Oct 7, 2026

AutoAdapt: Automatic Domain Discovery Enables Low-Cost Extensibility

Instruction-tuned models are deployed into environments where domains are heterogeneous and evolve, yet adding new domains or data typically requires costly retraining. We present AutoAdapt, a modular framework that incorporates new domains and data via targeted single-adapter training without modifying other adapters. The framework automatically discovers latent domains, uses them to train per-domain Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapters independently in parallel and performs parameter-free routing. Across 14 domain-specific benchmarks and GPT-4o pairwise judgements, AutoAdapt achieves parity with a LoRA adapter trained on all domains without requiring full-model retraining. We also find evidence of specialisation effect convergence across independent discovery methods. Overall, training each adapter on its own domain prevents domain interference by construction, thus enabling modular, taxonomy-free domain specialisation without aggregate performance loss or full model retraining.
Apr 6, 2026

GAIN: Multiplicative Modulation for Domain Adaptation

Adapting LLMs to new domains causes forgetting because standard methods (e.g., full fine-tuning, LoRA) inject new directions into the weight space. We show that forgetting is governed by one algebraic property: whether the update preserves the column span of the pretrained weight matrix (Proposition 1). We propose GAIN, the simplest multiplicative alternative (W_new = S * W), which satisfies this by construction and can be absorbed into existing weights for zero inference cost. Across five models (774M to 70B) adapted sequentially over eight domains, GAIN improves earlier-domain perplexity by 7-13%, while LoRA degrades it by 18-36%. GAIN matches replay-augmented LoRA without storing prior data and dominates EWC on the forgetting-adaptation Pareto front. While LoRA can only reduce forgetting by sacrificing in-domain adaptation, GAIN achieves both with no domain boundaries and no regularization. The principle generalises: (IA)^3, an independent multiplicative method, also improves earlier domains.