Double Coupling Architecture and Training Method for Optimization Problems of Differential Algebraic Equations with Parameters
Organizations: Chongqing Key Laboratory of Automated Reasoning and Cognition, Chongqing Institute of Green and Intelligent Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266 Fangzheng Avenue, Liangjiang District, 400714, Chongqing, China. · Chongqing School, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 266 Fangzheng Avenue, Liangjiang District, 400714, Chongqing, China.
Abstract
Simulation and modeling are essential in product development, integrated into the design and manufacturing process to enhance efficiency and quality. They are typically represented as complex nonlinear differential algebraic equations. The growing diversity of product requirements demands multi-task optimization, a key challenge in simulation modeling research. A dual physics-informed neural network architecture has been proposed to decouple constraints and objective functions in parametric differential algebraic equation optimization problems. Theoretical analysis shows that introducing a relaxation variable with a global error bound ensures solution equivalence between the network and optimization problem. A genetic algorithm-enhanced training framework for physics-informed neural networks improves training precision and efficiency, avoiding redundant solving of differential algebraic equations. This approach enables generalization for multi-task objectives with a single, training maintaining real-time responsiveness to product requirements.
Figures & tables
| Method | Minimum Objective Value | Iteration Count |
|---|---|---|
| New OB relaxation Song and Khan (2022) | 23 | |
| SBM relaxation Scott and Barton (2012) | 33 | |
| Our method | 6 |
| Method | Parameters | |
|---|---|---|
| -global method Scott and Barton (2015) | ||
| Method in Kremling et al. (2004) | ||
| Our method (predicted) | ||
| Our method (corrected) |
| Training Cost (s) | Prediction Cost (s) | Correction Cost (s) | B B Cost (s) Bajaj and Hasan (2020) | Predicted | Predicted | Optimal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| \begin{array}[]{c}[0.5714,\\ 0.4541]\end{array} | \begin{array}[]{c}[0.5721,\\ 0.4544\end{array} | ||||||
| \begin{array}[]{c}[0.6325,\\ 0.5137,\\ 0.4474]\end{array} | \begin{array}[]{c}[0.6330,\\ 0.5141,\\ 0.4481]\end{array} | ||||||
| \begin{array}[]{c}[0.6751,\\ 0.5564,\\ 0.4902,\\ 0.4437]\end{array} | \begin{array}[]{c}[0.6771,\\ 0.5572,\\ 0.4904,\\ 0.4444]\end{array} | ||||||
| \begin{array}[]{c}[0.7396,\\ 0.6170,\\ 0.5484,\\ 0.5014,\\ 0.4667,\\ 0.4392]\end{array} | \begin{array}[]{c}[0.7404,\\ 0.6187,\\ 0.5506,\\ 0.5038,\\ 0.4685,\\ 0.4403]\end{array} | ||||||
| \begin{array}[]{c}[0.7852,\\ 0.6633,\\ 0.5949,\\ 0.5473,\\ 0.5109,\\ 0.4823,\\ 0.4578,\\ 0.4372]\end{array} | \begin{array}[]{c}[0.7859,\\ 0.6636,\\ 0.5949,\\ 0.5474,\\ 0.5113,\\ 0.4825,\\ 0.4582,\\ 0.4377]\end{array} | ||||||
| \begin{array}[]{c}[0.8241,\\ 0.6981,\\ 0.6285,\\ 0.5809,\\ 0.5443,\\ 0.5148,\\ 0.4902,\\ 0.4692,\\ 0.4513,\\ 0.4348]\end{array} | \begin{array}[]{c}[0.8241,\\ 0.6984,\\ 0.6287,\\ 0.5811,\\ 0.5445,\\ 0.5150,\\ 0.4904,\\ 0.4694,\\ 0.4515,\\ 0.4350]\end{array} |
Constrained Optimization
Constrained optimization finds the best decisions while satisfying equality, inequality, resource, safety, or fairness requirements.
See all 335 papers