How Vulnerable Are Edge LLMs?

Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly moving from research settings into the wild, deployed on enterprise infrastructure, personal devices, and edge platforms. While cloud deployments offer scalable compute, concerns over data sovereignty, compliance, latency, and third-party dependence are driving organizations toward edge and on-premise LLMs. This shift introduces new security and privacy challenges: limited compute and memory force aggressive optimizations, including quantization, pruning, model partitioning, and parameter-efficient adaptation, each of which can introduce vulnerabilities and reshape the threat landscape. We describe this tension as the Security-Efficiency Paradox, mechanisms that improve efficiency may weaken robustness, expose new attack surfaces, or increase privacy risks. We examine how compression can degrade safety alignment, how partitioned inference enables reconstruction attacks, and how continuous local adaptation may cause privacy leakage and model drift. To analyze these risks, we introduce a deployment-centric taxonomy organized around three architectural constraints: the Memory Wall, the Quadratic Wall, and the Compute Wall. We derive a unified constraint model that quantifies when unsafe optimizations become unavoidable, linking each wall to specific attack surfaces. Building on this model, we propose the Secure Operational Efficiency Score (SOES), a holistic metric balancing task accuracy, jailbreak resistance, and privacy against energy, memory, and latency, enabling practitioners to configure edge LLMs under real-world hardware limits. We further present a practical decision procedure and targeted mitigations for each optimization-induced vulnerability. Together, these contributions provide a co-designed framework for jointly evaluating security, privacy, and efficiency, laying a foundation for securing edge-native intelligent systems.

Quantized large language models are increasingly deployed on edge devices for their low latency and energy efficiency. However, model quantization weakens alignment safeguards, leaving qLLMs (quantized large language models) highly vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. To address this challenge, we present MOMAT (Mixture of Multiple Atlases), a hardware-enhanced safety framework that combines structured knowledge retrieval with low-power defense acceleration. Each atlas represents a semantic cluster of harmful or benign sample sets and policy templates, enabling domain-localized Retrieval-Augmented Generation guarding that mitigates the curse of dimensionality and the resulting semantic sparsity problem in large, heterogeneous safety databases. MOMAT retrieves top-$k$ similarity features from all atlases for each prompt and evaluates them using a lightweight MoE (Mixture of Experts) detector, while a CiM (Compute-in-Memory)-accelerated similarity engine performs fast, low-power atlas-local retrieval. MOMAT's CiM-based retrieval accelerates a 100-query batch from 15,052.44 ms to 3,207.21 ns (a $4.69 \times 10^6\times$ speedup) and reduces energy from $8.1 \times 10^7$ $μ$J to 3.32 $μ$J, yielding an approximately $2.5 \times 10^5\times$ energy reduction over DRAM-based (Raspberry Pi) baselines. Red-team evaluations across standard benchmarks show that MOMAT matches the defense performance of state-of-the-art methods while avoiding benign overkill and providing substantial efficiency gains, demonstrating that CiM-based modular defenses can make edge-deployed qLLMs both safer and more energy-efficient. We will release the full 223.2k-sample dataset to foster future research.

LLM quantization has become essential for memory-efficient deployment. Recent work has shown that quantization schemes can pose critical security risks: an adversary may release a model that appears benign in full precision but exhibits malicious behavior once quantized by users. However, existing quantization-conditioned attacks have been limited to relatively simple quantization methods, where the attacker can estimate weight regions that remain invariant under the target quantization. Notably, prior attacks have consistently failed to compromise more popular and sophisticated schemes, limiting their practical impact. In this work, we introduce the first quantization-conditioned attack that consistently induces malicious behavior that can be triggered by a broad range of advanced quantization techniques, including AWQ, GPTQ, and GGUF I-quants. Our attack exploits a simple property shared by many modern quantization methods: large outliers can cause other weights to be rounded to zero. Consequently, by injecting outliers into specific weight blocks, an adversary can induce a targeted, predictable weight collapse in the model. This effect can be used to craft seemingly benign full-precision models that exhibit a wide range of malicious behaviors after quantization. Through extensive evaluation across three attack scenarios and LLMs, we show that our attack achieves high success rates against a broad range of quantization methods on which prior attacks fail. Our results demonstrate, for the first time, that the security risks of quantization are not restricted to simpler schemes but are broadly relevant across complex, widely-used quantization methods.