Organizations: Singapore Management University, Singapore · The University of Warwick, UK · Nanyang Technological University, Singapore · Imperial College London, UK
Recent Deepfake Video Detection (DFD) studies have demonstrated that pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as CLIP exhibit strong generalization capabilities in detecting artifacts across different identities. However, existing approaches focus on leveraging visual features only, overlooking their most distinctive strength -- the rich vision-language semantics embedded in the latent space. We propose VLAForge, a novel DFD framework that unleashes the potential of such cross-modal semantics to enhance model's discriminability in deepfake detection. This work i) enhances the visual perception of VLM through a ForgePerceiver, which acts as an independent learner to capture diverse, subtle forgery cues both granularly and holistically, while preserving the pretrained Vision-Language Alignment (VLA) knowledge, and ii) provides a complementary discriminative cue -- Identity-Aware VLA score, derived by coupling cross-modal semantics with the forgery cues learned by ForgePerceiver. Notably, the VLA score is augmented by an identity prior-informed text prompting to capture authenticity cues tailored to each identity, thereby enabling more discriminative cross-modal semantics. Comprehensive experiments on video DFD benchmarks, including classical face-swapping forgeries and recent full-face generation forgeries, demonstrate that our VLAForge substantially outperforms state-of-the-art methods at both frame and video levels. Code is available at https://github.com/mala-lab/VLAForge.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Visualization of (a) visual attention map of CLIP, (b) forgery localization map of ForgePerceiver, and (c) VLA attention map. Without proper adaptation, CLIP focuses on task-irrelevant visual cues. ForgePerceiver improves this case by highlighting potential forgery areas, but it provides coarse spatial guidance only. Augmented by discriminative identity priors, the VLA attention map offers more fine-grained, stronger forgery indication.
Figure 2: Overview of VLAForge . It exploit the potential of VLMs in deepfake detection by i) ForgePerceiver, which acts as an independent learner to capture diverse, subtle forgery cues granularly and holistically; and ii) Identity-Aware VLA Scoring, which is driven by identity prior-informed text prompting and its enriched cross-modal semantics coupled with the visual forgery cues from ForgePerceiver.
Frame-level AUROC
Video-level AUROC
Method
Venue
CDF-v1
CDF-v2
DFDC
DFD
Method
Venue
CDF-v2
DFDC
DFD
Xception [ 34 ]
ICCV’19
77.9
73.7
70.8
81.6
TALL [ 42 ]
ICCV’23
83.1
69.3
83.3
EfficientB4 [ 27 ]
ICML‘19
79.1
74.9
69.6
81.5
SeeABLE [ 20 ]
ICCV’23
87.3
75.9
-
X-ray [ 21 ]
CVPR’20
70.9
67.9
63.3
76.6
IID [ 18 ]
CVPR’23
83.8
70.0
93.9
FFD [ 10 ]
CVPR’20
78.4
74.4
70.3
80.2
SFDG [ 40 ]
CVPR’23
75.8
73.6
88.0
SPSL [ 26 ]
CVPR’21
81.5
76.5
70.4
81.2
CADDM [ 12 ]
CVPR’23
93.9
73.9
-
Table 1: AUROC results of frame-level and video-level deepfake detection. † indicates results reproduced by us. The best and second-best results are respectively highlighed in blue and yellow .
Setting
Method
VQGAN
StyleGAN
SiT
DiT
PixArt
F-level
RepDFD
80.5
82.2
58.2
58.7
88.5
ForAda
93.9
92.5
69.0
62.0
96.5
Ours
98.4
98.0
77.4
70.7
97.2
V-level
RepDFD
85.0
86.3
69.3
58.9
94.8
ForAda
98.1
97.9
76.0
67.1
98.5
Ours
99.7
99.7
85.9
80.3
99.5
Table 2: AUROC results on frame (F)- and video (V)-level detection of GAN- and diffusion-generated full-face forgeries.
Setting
Model
CDF-v2
DFDC
DFD
VQGAN
SiT
F-level
Base
58.3
64.0
77.5
74.8
52.9
+ T1
76.3
76.0
74.6
89.7
69.3
+ T2
82.3
80.9
87.4
95.1
74.6
+ T3
90.8
86.5
92.8
97.6
76.8
+ T4
91.2
87.0
93.6
98.4
77.4
V-level
Base
60.3
64.6
83.9
79.4
59.2
Table 3: Frame (F)- and video (V)-level module ablation results.
Setting
LVLA
Lorth
CDF-v2
DFDC
DFD
VQGAN
SiT
F-level
×
×
88.4
84.0
91.0
96.2
74.8
×
✓
89.1
84.7
92.1
97.2
75.0
✓
×
91.0
86.9
92.8
97.3
76.4
✓
✓
91.2
87.0
93.6
98.4
77.4
V-level
×
×
93.6
86.6
95.1
97.8
85.0
×
✓
93.9
87.3
96.1
99.2
85.1
Table 4: Frame (F)- and video (V)-level loss ablation results.
Figure 3: Attention visualization of forgery faces produced by different models: (a) Attention from original CLIP; (b) Attention of forgery-aware masks from ForgePrecever.
Figure 4: Visualization of VLA attention maps with (w.) and without (w/o.) injecting identity prior into text prompts.
Figure 5: Frame-level and Video-level AUROC based on different value of q ( Left ) and α ( Right ).
Appendix figures & tables7 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Dataset
Sythesis Methods
Real
Fake
Total
FaceForensics++
4
1000
4000
5000
CelebDF v1
1
408
795
1203
CelebDF v2
1
590
5634
6229
DFDC
8
23654
104500
128154
DFD
5
363
3000
3363
Appendix
Table 5: Data statistics of face-swapping forgery datasets.
Dataset
Synthesis Type
Real
Fake
Total
VQGAN
GAN based
590
5634
6229
StyleGAN-XL
GAN based
590
5634
6229
SiT-XL/2
Latent Diffusion
590
5634
6229
DiT
Latent Diffusion
590
5634
6229
PixArt
Latent Diffusion
590
5634
6229
Appendix
Table 6: Data statistics of full-face synthesized data generated based on GAN and Diffusion-based methods.
Methods
Param.
Training (ms)
Inference (ms)
CDF-v2
DFDC
AVG
DCL
19.35M
-
-
82.3
76.7
79.5
FTCN
26.6M
-
-
86.9
74.0
80.5
CFM
25.37M
-
-
89.7
80.2
85.0
RepDFD
0.078M
1832.4±7.5
42.3±0.6
89.9
81.0
85.5
ForAda
5.7M
933.3±1.4
21.2±0.2
95.7
87.2
91.5
Ours
3.28 M
1410.0±2.2
41.7±0.9
96.8
89.6
93.2
Appendix
Table 7: Model complexity analysis in Video-level AUROC.
Method
CDF-v2
DFDC
DFD
VQGAN
SiT
F-level
LLaVA
89.8
85.8
92.1
98.1
76.6
LLM-Prompt
89.5
86.3
92.7
97.5
75.1
Arc2Face-ID
90.6
86.4
92.5
98.0
76.9
Learn-Prompt
83.8
82.3
90.1
96.6
76.4
w/o Real/Fake
89.5
86.3
92.7
97.5
75.1
VLAForge
91.2
87.0
93.6
98.4
77.4
Appendix
Table 8: Frame (F)- and video (V)-level AUROC using different prompt variants.
Figure 6: T-sNE visualization comparison of the DFD features between visual-only model (‘ T2 ’ in Table 3) and complete VLAForge (‘ T4 ’ in Table 3).
Figure 7: More visualization of VLA attention maps with (w.) and without (w/o.) injecting identity prior into text prompts.).
SEED
CDF-v2
DFDC
DFD
VQGAN
SiT-XL/2
F-level
1024
91.2
87.0
93.6
98.3
77.4
0000
91.4
87.9
92.8
98.6
76.9
1111
90.7
86.7
93.2
97.9
77.6
AVG
91.1
87.2
93.2
98.3
77.3
V-level
1024
96.8
89.6
97.2
99.7
85.9
0000
97.0
89.9
96.4
99.6
85.4
Appendix
Table 9: Frame (F)- and video (V)-level AUROC using different random seeds.
Current Vision-Language Models (VLMs) for deepfake detection excel at identifying spatial artifacts but overlook a critical dimension: temporal inconsistencies in video forgeries. Adapting VLMs to reason about these dynamic cues remains a distinct challenge. To bridge this gap, we propose Forensic Answer-Questioning (FAQ), a large-scale benchmark that formulates temporal deepfake analysis as a multiple-choice task. FAQ introduces a three-level hierarchy to progressively evaluate and equip VLMs with forensic capabilities: (1) Facial Perception, testing the ability to identify static visual artifacts; (2) Temporal Deepfake Grounding, requiring the localization of dynamic forgery artifacts across frames; and (3) Forensic Reasoning, challenging models to synthesize evidence for final authenticity verdicts. We evaluate a range of VLMs on FAQ and generate a corresponding instruction-tuning set, FAQ-IT. Extensive experiments show that models fine-tuned on FAQ-IT achieve advanced performance on both in-domain and cross-dataset detection benchmarks. Ablation studies further validate the impact of our key design choices, confirming that FAQ is the driving force behind the temporal reasoning capabilities of these VLMs.
Zheyuan Gu, Qingsong Zhao, Yusong Wang +6
Institute of Artificial Intelligence, China Telecom (TeleAI) · Peking University · Fudan University
The rapid advancement of deepfake generation techniques poses significant threats to public safety and causes societal harm through the creation of highly realistic synthetic facial media. While existing detection methods demonstrate limitations in generalizing to emerging forgery patterns, this paper presents Deepfake Forensics Adapter (DFA), a novel dual-stream framework that synergizes vision-language foundation models with targeted forensics analysis. Our approach integrates a pre-trained CLIP model with three core components to achieve specialized deepfake detection by leveraging the powerful general capabilities of CLIP without changing CLIP parameters: 1) A Global Feature Adapter is used to identify global inconsistencies in image content that may indicate forgery, 2) A Local Anomaly Stream enhances the model's ability to perceive local facial forgery cues by explicitly leveraging facial structure priors, and 3) An Interactive Fusion Classifier promotes deep interaction and fusion between global and local features using a transformer encoder. Extensive evaluations of frame-level and video-level benchmarks demonstrate the superior generalization capabilities of DFA, particularly achieving state-of-the-art performance in the challenging DFDC dataset with frame-level AUC/EER of 0.816/0.256 and video-level AUC/EER of 0.836/0.251, representing a 4.8% video AUC improvement over previous methods. Our framework not only demonstrates state-of-the-art performance, but also points out a feasible and effective direction for developing a robust deepfake detection system with enhanced generalization capabilities against the evolving deepfake threats. Our code is available at https://github.com/Liao330/DFA.git
Jianfeng Liao, Yichen Wei, Raymond Chan Ching Bon +3
Shenzhen Technology University, Guangdong, China · Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, Singapore · The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China +1
The rapid advancement of Deepfake technologies and video manipulation tools poses a critical challenge to multimedia forensics, judicial evidence integrity, and information authenticity. Current detectors rely on single-modality signals, treating appearance, geometry, and motion independently. However, advanced generators maintain within-modality consistency while producing cross-modal contradictions, which are forensically discriminative but invisible to any single-modal detector. We propose CAM-VFD, a Cross-Attention Multimodal Video Forgery Detection framework that models cross-modal contradiction as a directional forensic signal. The framework uses a cross-attention fusion mechanism in which CLIP-based appearance representations serve as queries against VideoMAE motion features and MiDaS depth features, enabling the identification of contradictions between visual, temporal, and geometric evidence. We examine this design through cross-modal attention discrepancy analysis, observing statistically separable real and fake distributions (p<0.001, Cohen's d=0.68). Experimental results on two generative video benchmarks indicate consistent performance, with 95.31% Top-1 accuracy on GenVidBench and 93.43% accuracy, 90.63% F1-score, and 96.56% AUROC on GenVideo. Moreover, CAM-VFD demonstrates stable performance under compression, noise, blur, and adversarial perturbations, suggesting that cross-modal reasoning may improve robustness in media forensics. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/Hoda-Osama/CAM-VFD/tree/main.