cs.LGMar 25, 2026

Flow matching on homogeneous spaces

Authors: Francesco Ruscelli

Abstract

We propose a general framework to extend Flow Matching to homogeneous spaces, i.e. quotients of Lie groups. Our approach reformulates the problem as a flow matching task on the underlying Lie group by lifting the data distributions. This strategy avoids the potentially complicated geometry of homogeneous spaces by working directly on Lie groups, which in turn enables us reduce the problem to a Euclidean flow matching task on Lie algebras. In contrast to Riemannian Flow Matching, our method eliminates the need to define and compute premetrics or geodesics, resulting in a simpler, faster, and fully intrinsic framework.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 5, 2026

Flow Matching on Symmetric Spaces

We introduce a general framework for training flow matching models on Riemannian symmetric spaces, a large class of manifolds that includes the sphere, hyperbolic space and Grassmannians. We exploit their algebraic structure to reformulate flow matching on symmetric spaces as flow matching on a subspace of the Lie algebra of their isometry group, thus linearizing the problem and greatly simplifying the handling of geodesics. As an application, we showcase our framework on the real Grassmannians SO⁡(n)/SO⁡(k)×SO⁡(n−k)\operatorname{SO}(n) / \operatorname{SO}(k) \times \operatorname{SO}(n-k).
Oct 22, 2026

Compatible Likelihoods for Flow Matching on Manifolds

On the simplest non-Euclidean manifold, the 1D flat torus, we exhibit a distribution where a recently proposed extension of Riemannian flow matching is globally optimized by a velocity field that pushes samples away from the data distribution. We trace this failure mode to a property we call compatibility; a likelihood-based flow matching objective is compatible if its population minimizer recovers the marginal velocity field induced by the data and coupling. We give a general condition for compatibility, apply it to existing methods, and bound the worst-case error in terms of a residual component vanishing under compatibility. Next, we note that existing compatible objectives put density on velocities that are infeasible on compact manifolds. We propose an objective built from an exponential family over endpoints, with the conditional velocity as sufficient statistic, which is both compatible and supported only on feasible velocities. This manifests as a reweighting of the flow matching loss which, on constant-curvature manifolds, treats errors in flow speed and direction differently. Empirically, our method recovers the correct velocity field on the test case, outperforms prior methods on high-dimensional product tori, and obtains substantial NLL improvements over prior work on two of four standard geospatial benchmarks on the sphere at moderate runtime overhead. On a large dataset of high-dimensional human poses, our method outperforms prior work according to sample-based metrics.
Sep 28, 2026

Probabilistic Geodesic Flow Matching on Location-Scale Families

Flow matching (FM) has recently emerged as a promising framework for generative modeling due to its conceptual simplicity and strong empirical performance. In FM, samples are transported along a vector field parameterized by a neural network, inducing a probability path that evolves from a simple noise distribution to the target data distribution, governed by an ordinary differential equation (ODE). However, existing FM approaches predominantly rely on probability paths derived from optimal transport (OT) between Gaussian distributions, which may be suboptimal for capturing complex data with inhomogeneous structures such as heavy tail or sharp contrast. In this work, we generalize FM to the broader class of location-scale families for handling data inhomogeneity and introduce a novel class of probability paths defined as geodesics on the manifold of probability distributions. We name this approach probabilistic geodesic flow matching to distinguish it from prior geodesic (Riemannian) FM methods defined in input space. We argue that Euclidean OT-based paths are not necessarily optimal in probability space and may limit modeling flexibility. Through synthetic benchmarks and scientific datasets at different scales, we demonstrate that the proposed method more effectively captures complex distributions, leading to improved or comparable performance compared with SOTA geometry-motivated generative models.