Organizations: School of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wuhan University of Technology, China · School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China
Multimodal Large Language Models often suffer from object hallucination. While existing research utilizes attention enhancement and visual retracing, we find these works lack sufficient interpretability regarding attention drift in final model stages. In this paper, we investigate the layer wise evolution of visual features and discover that hallucination stems from deep layer attention regressing toward initial visual noise from early layers. We observe that output reliability depends on acquiring visual anchors at intermediate layers rather than final layers. Based on these insights, we propose CLVA, which stands for Cross-Layer Visual Anchors, a training free method that reinforces critical mid layer features while suppressing regressive noise. This approach effectively pulls deep layer attention back to correct visual regions by utilizing essential anchors captured from attention dynamics. We evaluate our method across diverse architectures and benchmarks, demonstrating outstanding performance without significant increase in computational time and GPU memory.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Matrix visualization of visual attention intensity across 32 layers and 32 heads in LLaVA. Colors represent the average attention weights to visual tokens Tvis , while numbers denote the average attention weights to system and text prompt tokens.
Figure 2: Attention analysis on LLaVA-1.5-7B. (a) Heatmap visualization of attention patterns across different layers. (b) Statistical metrics where the blue line represents the average attention entropy of vision sensitive heads. The green and red lines denote the Pearson correlation coefficients between the attention distributions of each layer and the mean attention of insensitive heads in initial layers and sensitive heads in intermediate layers, respectively.
Figure 3: Architecture of CLVA. Based on our attention analysis, we propose a two-step process to anchor drifting attention, where positive anchoring anchors core visual semantic features while negative anchoring excludes background noise using insensitive heads.
Evaluation
Methods
Random
Popular
Adversarial
Average
F1-score ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1-score ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1-score ↑
Accuracy ↑
F1-score ↑
Accuracy ↑
LLaVA-1.5
Greedy
87.18
88.26
84.48
85.02
81.24
81.11
84.30
84.79
Beam Search
87.26
88.35
84.50
85.03
81.21
81.09
84.32
84.82
MemVR
87.83
88.40
83.20
84.37
80.61
80.53
83.88
84.43
ClearSight
88.16
88.77
85.13
85.02
81.44
80.39
84.91
84.72
IMCCD
88.22
88.82
85.45
86.00
82.07
81.66
85.24
85.49
Table 1: Results on the POPE benchmark. Results are averaged across the MS-COCO, A-OKVQA, and GQA datasets. The best and second best results are bolded and underlined, respectively. “-” indicates the result is not supported by the released implementation.
Methods
LLaVA-1.5
InstructBLIP
Qwen-VL
CHAIR i ↓
CHAIR s ↓
Recall ↑
CHAIR i ↓
CHAIR s ↓
Recall ↑
CHAIR i ↓
CHAIR s ↓
Recall ↑
Greedy
53.0
15.2
76.7
57.0
16.7
70.4
6.6
7.0
45.5
Beam Search
55.6
16.0
76.7
56.2
14.7
71.4
6.4
5.7
45.7
MemVR
49.2
12.9
78.4
-
-
-
4.7
4.0
45.3
ClearSight
50.0
13.6
78.8
-
-
-
4.2
3.8
44.0
IMCCD
52.2
13.5
76.6
55.3
17.0
73.0
6.6
5.3
41.7
Table 2: CHAIR hallucination evaluation results. The best and second best results are bolded and underlined, respectively.
Model
Decoding
Object-level
Attribute-level
Total ↑
Existence ↑
Count ↑
Position ↑
Color ↑
LLaVA-1.5
Greedy
170.00
130.00
93.33
121.66
514.99
Beam Search
170.00
130.00
93.33
121.66
514.99
MemVR
190.00
155.00
133.33
170.00
648.33
ClearSight
190.00
160.00
133.33
160.00
643.33
IMCCD
195.00
138.33
123.33
155.00
611.66
Table 3: Results on the hallucination subset of MME. The best performances within each setting are bolded.
Figure 4: Results of LLaVA1.5 on MME-Fullset.
POS
NEG
MME
MME
POPE(Random & COCO)
(Hallucination)
(Overall)
F1-score
Accuracy
514.99
1558.76
84.60
86.76
+
654.66
1843.92
85.39
87.00
+
643.66
1819.95
85.50
87.06
+
+
666.66
1851.23
86.99
88.26
-
-
505.00
1531.26
83.73
86.20
Table 4: Ablation study of different components in CLVA for LLaVA-1.5. POS and NEG denote positive and negative anchors, while + and - represent the positive and negative usage of anchors, respectively.
Appendix figures & tables8 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Model
Method
Accuracy
Total Time
GPU-Memory
Latency/Example
LLaVA-1.5
Greedy
84.79
0:7:48
15.7G
0.155s
IMCCD
85.49
0:16:38
18.7G
0.353s
CLVA (ours)
85.98
0:7:54
15.8G
0.157s
InstructBLIP
Greedy
77.02
0:5:07
16.6G
0.102s
IMCCD
81.60
0:10:30
16.7G
0.207s
CLVA (ours)
82.46
0:5:22
16.6G
0.105s
Appendix
Table 5: Comparison of inference speed and GPU memory usage for different models and methods on the POPE dataset
Figure 5: Ablation study of α and β
Method
LLaVA-1.5
InstructBLIP
Qwen-VL
F1
Accuracy
F1
Accuracy
F1
Accuracy
random
sample
81.94
83.76
81.12
81.50
83.72
85.73
ours
82.97
84.33
84.06
84.43
84.87
86.56
popular
sample
80.86
82.56
78.74
78.50
83.03
84.96
ours
83.52
84.96
82.54
81.55
83.54
85.86
adversarial
sample
78.43
79.73
77.91
77.43
81.43
83.13
Appendix
Table 6: Results of different models using nucleus sampling on the POPE dataset
Figure 6: Is there a backpack in the image?
Figure 7: Is there a bicycle in the image?
Figure 8: An example of the LLaVA-1.5 model on LLaVA-Bench; red text indicates incorrect answers.
Figure 9: An example of the InstructBLIP model on LLaVA-Bench; red text indicates incorrect answers.
Figure 10: An example of the Qwen-VL model on LLaVA-Bench; red text indicates incorrect answers.
Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across diverse multimodal tasks, yet they continue to suffer from hallucinations, generating content that is inconsistent with the visual input. Prior work DHCP (Detecting Hallucinations by Cross-modal Attention Pattern) has explored hallucination detection from the perspective of cross-modal attention, but does not address hallucination mitigation. In this paper, we propose MHSA (Mitigating Hallucinations via Steered Attention), a lightweight framework that mitigates hallucinations by learning to correct cross-modal attention patterns in LVLMs. MHSA trains a simple three-layer MLP generator to produce corrected attention, guided by supervisory signals from the DHCP discriminator and the LVLM itself. During inference, MHSA mitigates both discriminative and generative hallucinations across various datasets and LVLMs by simply replacing the original cross-modal attention with the corrected one, without modifying any LVLM parameters. By extending cross-modal attention mechanisms from hallucination detection to hallucination mitigation, MHSA offers a novel perspective on hallucination research in LVLMs and helps enhance their reliability.
Wei Ding, Yilin Li, Yudong Zhang +4
Tsinghua University Beijing, China · Tsinghua University, Tencent Beijing, China · Tencent Beijing, China +2
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have become a key interface for visual reasoning and grounded question answering, yet they remain vulnerable to visual hallucinations, where generated responses contradict image content or mention nonexistent objects. A central challenge is that hallucination is not always caused by a simple lack of visual attention: the model may still assign substantial attention mass to image tokens while internally drifting toward an incorrect answer. In this paper, we show that the high-frequency structure of visual attention, measured by layer-wise Laplacian energy, reveals both the layer where hallucinated preferences emerge and the layer where the ground-truth answer transiently recovers. Building on this finding, we propose LaSCD (Laplacian-Spectral Contrastive Decoding), a training-free decoding strategy that selects informative layers via Laplacian energy and remaps next-token logits in closed form. Experiments on hallucination and general multimodal benchmarks show that LaSCD consistently reduces hallucination while preserving general capabilities, highlighting its potential as a faithful decoding paradigm. The code is available at https://github.com/macovaseas/LaSCD.
Fanpu Cao, Xin Zou, Xuming Hu +1
Thrust of Artificial Intelligence, HKUST (Guangzhou), China · Department of Computer Science and Engineering, HKUST, Hong Kong SAR, China
Despite recent advances in large vision-language models (LVLMs), object hallucination remains a major barrier to their reliable deployment. Existing detection methods often characterize visual grounding using attention from individual layers, leaving its evolution across layers underexplored. We propose CADMP, a lightweight object hallucination detection framework that combines adjacent-layer cross-modal attention drift with prediction sensitivity to targeted visual masking. During decoding, CADMP quantifies distributional changes between consecutive cross-modal attention maps to capture abrupt transitions in visual grounding. It then selects the transition with the largest drift, locates the corresponding visually relevant regions, and measures the change in prediction probability after masking these regions. These two signals provide complementary evidence: attention drift characterizes the stability of internal visual grounding, while probability variation verifies whether a prediction truly depends on the identified visual evidence. A lightweight detector integrates both signals to identify hallucinated predictions. Experiments on multiple benchmarks and representative open-source LVLMs demonstrate that CADMP achieves consistently competitive detection performance. Ablation studies further confirm the complementary contributions of adjacent-layer drift modeling and mask-based grounding verification.
Xuanbing Wen, Boxu Chen, Le Yang +4
Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China · Zhongguancun Laboratory, Beijing 100194, China