Recent unified models have made unprecedented progress in both understanding and generation. However, while most of them accept multi-modal inputs, they typically produce only single-modality outputs. This challenge of producing interleaved content is mainly due to training data scarcity and the difficulty of modeling long-range cross-modal context. To address this issue, we decompose interleaved generation into textual planning and visual consistency modeling, and introduce a framework consisting of a planner and a visualizer. The planner produces dense textual descriptions for visual content, while the visualizer synthesizes images accordingly. Under this guidance, we construct large-scale textual-proxy interleaved data (where visual content is represented in text) to train the planner, and curate reference-guided image data to train the visualizer. These designs give rise to Wan-Weaver, which exhibits emergent interleaved generation ability with long-range textual coherence and visual consistency. Meanwhile, the integration of diverse understanding and generation data into planner training enables Wan-Weaver to achieve robust task reasoning and generation proficiency. To assess the model's capability in interleaved generation, we further construct a benchmark that spans a wide range of use cases across multiple dimensions. Extensive experiments demonstrate that, even without access to any real interleaved data, Wan-Weaver achieves superior performance over existing methods.
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Overview of the inference process of Wan-Weaver . Given a prompt, the planner expert autoregressively generates plain text and dense prompts as visualization cues. Through causal multi-modal self-attention, the visualizer interacts with the planner, enabling it to synthesize images conditioned on the dense prompt context and visual references. The resulting text–image outputs are appended to the history and fed back into the planner, enabling an iterative interleaved generation process that maintains long-range contextual coherence.
Figure 3: Illustration of our decoupled training strategy.
Method
Completeness
Quality
Richness
Correctness
Human Alignment
IT Coherency
Multi-step Consistency
Overall
NExT-GPT
3.89
4.25
3.35
3.61
5.35
3.32
3.85
3.95
MiniGPT-5
3.91
4.50
3.61
3.63
5.51
3.56
4.10
4.12
Orthus
4.43
4.30
3.71
4.15
4.80
3.51
4.20
4.16
Show-o
4.37
4.79
3.83
3.76
5.78
4.04
4.33
4.41
VILA-U
5.60
5.14
4.68
4.78
5.69
4.74
4.79
5.06
SEED-LLaMA
5.59
5.50
4.61
4.59
6.50
4.43
5.13
5.19
Table 1: Quantitative comparison with existing state-of-the-art methods on interleaved generation benchmark OpenING [ 92 ] .
Figure 4: Statistics of WeaverBench. (a) Topic distribution across 14 everyday categories. (b) Prompt length distribution. (c) Distribution of the number of images requested per prompt.
Figure 5: Qualitative comparison with the state-of-the-art commercial system Nano Banana on interleaved text–image generation.
Table 3: Comparison across single-modality generation tasks (understanding, image generation, and editing). † : Our in-house base model with thinking mode (enabled only for understanding).
Figure 6: Loss curves of different training strategies.
Figure 7: Impact of training on different types of data on our planner. (left) Performance on understanding metrics. (right) Token prediction statistics per task.
Figure 8: Visual comparison of the results generated by different variants of our method.
Appendix figures & tables17 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Category
Encyclopedic Knowledge
News Media
Travel Guide
Daily Life
Food Cooking
#Data Samples
35 (16+19)
35 (16+19)
36 (17+19)
35 (16+19)
35 (16+19)
Category
Education Tutorial
Art Creation
Fashion Beauty
Media Entertainment
Product Marketing
#Data Samples
36 (17+19)
35 (16+19)
36 (17+19)
34 (16+18)
35 (16+19)
Category
Academic Research
Document Guides
Social Community
Reasoning
Multi-language
#Data Samples
35 (17+18)
36 (17+19)
29 (15+14)
32 (16+16)
28 (28+0)
Appendix
Table 4: Distribution of data samples across the 15 categories in the WeaverBench benchmark. ( The number before ‘+’ represents the amount for text-only input, and the number after ‘+’ represents the amount for image-text input.)
Method
PA
NC
CC
IC
CP
Overall
Acc
Intra-output
Input-to-image
Input-to-text
Entity
Style
Orthus
2.47
1.88
1.42
1.30
2.35
1.19
1.82
1.91
1.89
3.28%
Anole
4.14
3.76
3.56
3.31
4.44
3.00
3.83
3.64
3.74
6.56%
Emu3.5
7.65
7.55
7.42
7.41
7.86
7.22
7.78
7.41
7.53
48.36%
Nano Banana
8.53
8.19
8.31
8.57
8.70
8.09
8.67
8.29
8.38
66.39 %
Wan-Weaver (Ours)
8.71
8.33
8.26
8.41
8.83
7.85
8.41
8.46
8.43
93.44 %
Appendix
Table 5: Quantitative comparison on WeaverBench. PA: Prompt Adherence, NC: Narrative Coordination, CC: Content Consistency, IC: Image Consistency, CP: Completeness, Acc: Accuracy of the number of the generated images.
Model
Understanding
Image Generation
Image Editing
MMMU
MathVista
GenEval
DPG
ImgEdit
GEdit–EN
Visual Understanding Models
LLaVA-1.5 [ 44 ]
67.8
–
–
–
–
–
LLaVA-NeXT [ 43 ]
51.1
39.6
–
–
–
–
InternVL3-38B [ 93 ]
69.7
76.3
–
–
–
–
Ovis2-34B [ 47 ]
66.7
76.1
–
–
–
–
Appendix
Table 6: Comparison across single-modality generation tasks (understanding, image generation, and editing). † : Our in-house base model with thinking mode (enabled only for understanding). ‡ : Methods are using LLM rewriter.
Figure 9: Impact of training on different types of data on our planner. (left) Performance on understanding metrics. (right) Token prediction statistics per task.
Figure 10: Visual examples of failure cases.
Figure 11: Showcase of Wan-Weaver in general text-to-image generation.
Figure 12: Showcase of Wan-Weaver in general image-to-image generation, including object addition, removal, replacement, element extraction, pose manipulation, text editing, style/texture transfer, novel view synthesis, object detection/segmentation, and more.
Figure 13: Showcase of Wan-Weaver in interleaved text-image generation.
Figure 14: Examples of test samples from WeaverBench. For each category, we show one text-only user prompt and one mixed text–image user prompt (Part I).
Figure 15: Examples of test samples from WeaverBench. For each category, we show one text-only user prompt and one mixed text–image user prompt (Part II).
Figure 16: Examples of test samples from WeaverBench. For each category, we show one text-only user prompt and one mixed text–image user prompt (Part III).
Method
GPT Evaluation
IntJudge Evaluation
FDT
w/o Tie
w/ Tie (0)
w/ Tie (.5)
FDT
w/o Tie
w/ Tie (0)
w/ Tie (.5)
NExT-GPT
15.70%
15.60%
15.36%
16.13%
44.86%
32.61%
2.57%
48.63%
GILL
28.27%
28.29%
27.75%
28.71%
34.73%
6.52%
0.52%
46.51%
MiniGPT-5
30.20%
29.60%
28.84%
30.12%
31.97%
9.52%
1.03%
45.64%
Show-o
32.55%
32.10%
31.46%
32.46%
39.42%
13.16%
0.90%
47.47%
Orthus
34.63%
34.20%
33.45%
34.54%
43.05%
17.50%
1.19%
47.80%
Appendix
Table 7: Quantitative comparison of model win rates evaluated by GPT-4o and IntJudge. FDT: Force Dividing Tie metric. w/o Tie: Non-Tie case. w/ Tie (0) and w/ Tie Tie(.5): Count a tie as 0 and 0.5 wins for a model in a battle, respectively.
Figure 17: Examples of short, medium, and long user prompts in WeaverBench.
Table 8: The system prompts for obtaining detailed scores from GPT-based evaluators (Part I).
Table 9: The system prompts for obtaining detailed scores from GPT-based evaluators (Part II).
Table 10: The system prompts for obtaining detailed scores from GPT-based evaluators (Part III).
Table 11: The system prompts for obtaining detailed scores from GPT-based evaluators (Part IV).
Unified vision-language models have made significant progress in multimodal understanding and generation, yet they largely fall short in producing multimodal interleaved outputs, which is a crucial capability for tasks like visual storytelling and step-by-step visual reasoning. In this work, we propose a reinforcement learning-based post-training strategy to unlock this capability in existing unified models, without relying on large-scale multimodal interleaved datasets. We begin with a warm-up stage using a hybrid dataset comprising curated interleaved sequences and limited data for multimodal understanding and text-to-image generation, which exposes the model to interleaved generation patterns while preserving its pretrained capabilities. To further refine interleaved generation, we propose a unified policy optimization framework that extends Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) to the multimodal setting. Our approach jointly models text and image generation within a single decoding trajectory and optimizes it with our novel hybrid rewards covering textual relevance, visual-text alignment, and structural fidelity. Additionally, we incorporate process-level rewards to provide step-wise guidance, enhancing training efficiency in complex multimodal tasks. Experiments on MMIE and InterleavedBench demonstrate that our approach significantly enhances the quality and coherence of multimodal interleaved generation.
Ming Nie, Chunwei Wang, Jianhua Han +2
School of Data Science, Fudan University · Noah’s Ark Lab, Huawei · Yinwang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd.
Recent image generators have demonstrated impressive photorealism and instruction-following capabilities in single-image generation and editing. However, constrained by their architectures, they cannot achieve interleaved generation (text-image sequence), which has crucial applications in visual narratives, guidance, and embodied manipulation. Even the latest open-source Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) exhibit limited performance in this regard. In this paper, we introduce InterleaveThinker, the first multi-agent pipeline designed to endow any existing image generator with interleaved generation capabilities. Specifically, we employ a planner agent to organize the image-text input sequence, instructing the image generator on the required execution at each step. Subsequently, we introduce a critic agent to evaluate the generator's outputs, identify samples that deviate from the planned instructions, and refine the instructions for regeneration. To implement this pipeline, we construct the Interleave-Planner-SFT-80k and Interleave-Critic-SFT-112k to perform a format cold-start. Then we develop Interleave-Critic-RL-13k to reinforce the step-wise instruction correction capability within a generation trajectory using GRPO. Since a single interleaved generation trajectory may involve over 25 generator calls, optimizing the entire trajectory is computationally impractical. Therefore, we propose accuracy reward and step-wise reward, allowing single-step RL to effectively guide the entire generation trajectory. The results show that InterleaveThinker improves performance across various image generators. On interleaved generation benchmarks, it achieves performance comparable to Nano Banana and GPT-5. Surprisingly, it also significantly enhances the base model on reasoning-based benchmarks; for example, on 4-step FLUX.2-klein, we observe substantial gains on WISE and RISE.
The advancement of generative AI models capable of producing text and image marks a critical step forward in the realm of multimodal intelligence, particularly for tasks involving the interleaving of both modalities. To advance this intelligence to the next stage, it is crucial for models to autonomously generate free-form interleaved text-image sequences. In this paper, we introduce ILLUME-X, an advanced unified multimodal paradigm that enables high-quality, free-form interleaved text-image generation by improving multimodal data efficiency and stabilizing the multimodal training process. ILLUME-X comprises three key components: (i) an expanded training data pipeline optimized for interleaved text-image generation, (ii) a progressive training strategy with self-adaptive objectives for free-length multimodal token sequences, and (iii) an objective and comprehensive evaluation method ILScore for interleaved text-image sequences. Notably, our ILLUME-X outperforms previous unified models across multiple interleaved text-image generation tasks like style transfer, image decomposition and storytelling.
Chonghuinan Wang, Zhikai Chen, Chunwei Wang +9
Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China · Huawei Noah’s Ark Lab, Shenzhen, China · Zhengzhou Advanced Research Institute of Harbin Institute of Technology, Zhengzhou, China +1